What's new

Myanmar soldiers jailed for Rohingya killings freed after less than a year

Black_cats

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 31, 2010
Messages
10,031
Reaction score
-5
Myanmar soldiers jailed for Rohingya killings freed after less than a year
Reuters | Published: May 27, 2019 10:24:12

1558931052.JPG
Ten Rohingya Muslim men with their hands bound kneel in Inn Din village, Myanmar on September 1, 2017 — Handout via Reuters

Myanmar has granted early release to seven soldiers jailed for the killing of 10 Rohingya Muslim men and boys during a 2017 military crackdown in the western state of Rakhine, two prison officials, two former fellow inmates, and one of the soldiers told Reuters news agency.

The soldiers were freed in November last year, the two inmates said, meaning they served less than one year of their 10-year prison terms for the killings at Inn Din village.

They also served less jail time than two Reuters reporters who uncovered the killings. The journalists, Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo, spent more than 16 months behind bars on charges of obtaining state secrets. The two were released in an amnesty on May 6.

Win Naing, the chief warden at Rakhine’s Sittwe Prison, and a senior prison official in the capital, Naypyitaw, confirmed that the convicted soldiers had not been in prison for some months.

“Their punishment was reduced by the military,” said the senior Naypyitaw official, who declined to be named.

Both prison officials declined to provide further details and said they did not know the exact date of the release, which was not announced publicly.

Military spokesmen Zaw Min Tun and Tun Tun Nyi declined to comment.

The seven soldiers were the only security personnel the military has said it has punished over the 2017 operation in Rakhine, which drove more than 0.73 million (730,000) Rohingya Muslims to flee to Bangladesh. UN investigators said the crackdown was executed with “genocidal intent” and included mass killings, gang rapes, and widespread arson.

Myanmar denies widespread wrongdoing and officials have pointed to the jailing of the seven soldiers in the Inn Din case as evidence Myanmar security forces do not enjoy impunity.

“I would say that we took action against every case we could investigate,” the military’s commander in chief, Senior General Min Aung Hlaing, told officials from the UN Security Council in April last year, according to an account posted on his personal website.

The army chief cited the Inn Din case specifically. “The latest crime we punished was a killing, and ten years’ imprisonment was given to seven perpetrators,” he said. “We will not forgive anyone if they commit (a) crime.”

Reached by phone on Thursday, a man named Zin Paing Soe confirmed that he was one of the seven soldiers and that he was now free, but declined to comment further. “We were told to shut up,” he said.

‘First Step’
The 2017 campaign was launched across hundreds of villages in northern Rakhine in response to attacks by Rohingya insurgents. Reuters exposed the killings in a report published in February 2018.

Troops from the 33rd Light Infantry Division, a mobile force known for its brutal counter-insurgency campaigns, worked with members of a paramilitary police force and Buddhist vigilantes to drive out the entire Muslim population of Inn Din, burning and looting Rohingya homes and property, according to Buddhist and Muslim villagers and members of the security forces.

On September 1, 2017, soldiers and some villagers detained a group of 10 Rohingya. The military said the men were “terrorists”; their family members said they were farmers, high school students, and an Islamic teacher.

The next morning, witnesses said, Buddhist villagers hacked some of the Rohingya men with swords. The rest were shot by Myanmar troops and buried in a shallow grave.

The two Reuters reporters, Wa Lone, 33, and Kyaw Soe Oo, 29, discovered the grave and obtained pictures of the 10 men before and after they were killed. The journalists were arrested in December 2017 while investigating the killings and later sentenced to seven years in prison under the Official Secrets Act.

Defence lawyers argued their arrest and prosecution were aimed at blocking their reporting, and one police officer testified that a senior police official had ordered that the reporters be set up and arrested.

In April 2018, after launching an investigation into the killings, the military announced that four officers and three soldiers of other ranks had been dismissed from the military and sentenced to 10 years with hard labour for “contributing and participating in murder”. Neither their names nor details of their roles in the killing were disclosed.

Civilian leader Aung San Suu Kyi welcomed the convictions, telling reporters at the time the sentencing was Myanmar’s “first step on the road of taking responsibility”.

Suu Kyi’s spokesman, Zaw Htay, did not pick up a call seeking comment on the release of the seven soldiers.

https://thefinancialexpress.com.bd/...lings-freed-after-less-than-a-year-1558931052
 
. . . .
Nothing less can be expected from savages.

Surprised the savages even bothered with a "trial".
Myanmar is a mixture of Pakistan and North Korea tbh.

It is like Pakistan because the military uses religious sentiments and wants to turn Myanmar into some sort of religious entity like Pakistan army is trying hard to maintain the Islamic identity of Pakistan by funding mullahs.

It is like North Korea because of it's isolationist policy, it's desire to maintain a secretive regime and pro commie policy.

It is an open secret that most of the allies of China are either extremist states, communist states, dictator states and rogue military states
 
.
Myanmar is a mixture of Pakistan and North Korea tbh.

It is like Pakistan because the military uses religious sentiments and wants to turn Myanmar into some sort of religious entity like Pakistan army is trying hard to maintain the Islamic identity of Pakistan by funding mullahs.

It is like North Korea because of it's isolationist policy, it's desire to maintain a secretive regime and pro commie policy.

It is an open secret that most of the allies of China are either extremist states, communist states, dictator states and rogue military states

Still Pakistan is a lot better than Myanmar.

The state does not preach hatred of a minority and then kill, rape and expel them.
 
.
What should we expect in a world like this? No one punish their own soldiers for committing crimes on others. Trump considering to pardon US soldiers convicted of war crimes. Pakistan did not punish anyone for 71. Neither India punish anyone in their army for crimes in Kashmir.
 
.
What should we expect in a world like this? No one punish their own soldiers for committing crimes on others. Trump considering to pardon US soldiers convicted of war crimes. Pakistan did not punish anyone for 71. Neither India punish anyone in their army for crimes in Kashmir.
Still when the evidence is overwhelming and widely covered by media, civilized countries take action against their army. US prosecuted the army men who took part in Abu Gharib prison torture. Pakistan and India have no courage to do that, because these countries are not democratic in nature.
 
.
https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/myanmar-pariah-status-no-bar-defence-modernisation

Myanmar: pariah
status no bar to
defence modernisation

ANDREW SELTH
Despite criticisms, sanctions and embargoes, Myanmar
is strengthening military ties with neighbours and friends.

GettyImages-1133078067.jpg


Myanmar's fighter jets marking 74th Armed Forces Day in Naypyidaw on 27 March (Photo: Thet Aung via Getty)
Published 7 May 2019 15:00  

It has been more than two years since military “clearance operations” against Myanmar’s Rohingyas began in October 2016. Since then, the international community has relied on public criticism, unilateral sanctions and a range of measures in the United Nations and International Criminal Court to hold Myanmar’s government and armed forces (known as the Tatmadaw) accountable for their actions.

Myanmar’s political and military leaders have refused to acknowledge the crimes committed in Rakhine State, described by UN officials as ethnic cleansing, if not genocide. As it has done so often in the past, Naypyidaw seems to be relying on the weakness of the international system and the passage of time to escape any serious consequences.

From the lack of effective measures taken against Myanmar to date, this strategy seems to be working.

Indeed, a survey of recent security developments reveals that, despite all the criticisms levelled against it, the sanctions introduced and the embargoes imposed, Myanmar is still strengthening its defence relations with neighbours and friends, and the Tatmadaw is continuing to acquire modern arms.

pHXmHH2pCnZJ83DcZqiJeKR8BYmZJ5OC_0.jpg

Aung San Suu Kyi and Vladimir Putin during talks in Beijing last month (Photo: Kremlin.ru)
Since the advent of a “disciplined democracy” in Myanmar in 2011, China has sold it two Jianghu-2 class frigates, 76 Type-92 armoured vehicles, 12 CASC CH-4 unmanned aerial vehicles and up to 16 CAC/PAC JF-17 fighters, at an estimated cost of almost US$1 billion. Most of these arms have already been delivered. The first four JF-17s were commissioned by the Myanmar Air Force in December 2018.

The JF-17 was jointly developed with Pakistan, which has joined in criticism of Myanmar over its treatment of the Muslim Rohingyas. However, this does not appear to have affected the current contract. Two two-seater JF-17B training variants were delivered to Myanmar this year in March.

Since 2016, the Myanmar Air Force has also received 12 Yakovlev Yak-130 jet trainers from Russia, with a reported four more due for delivery. In October 2017, four of the Myanmar Air Force’s Mil Mi-24P helicopter gunships were serviced in Russia. In January 2018, Myanmar and Russia agreed on the sale of six Sukhoi Su-30 multi-role fighters. The contract is reportedly worth about $204 million.

37040659190_ae5fe1d783_kmini.jpg

SU-30SM (Photo: Alan Wilson/Flickr)
In December 2018, it was announced that India would donate six HAL HJT-16 Kiran jet trainers to the Myanmar Air Force, and station a team in Myanmar to help train their pilots and ground crew. India has also agreed to help Myanmar’s army and navy upgrade their arms and equipment as part of an expanding defence partnership. It is currently considering the sale of offshore patrol boats for the Myanmar Navy.

Last year, the Myanmar Air Force commissioned two French/Italian ATR 72-500 transport aircraft and an Airbus AS365 Eurocopter. They were purchased despite European Union arms embargoes, suggesting that the sale involved a third party. While both types are designated as civilian aircraft, the Tatmadaw has stated that they will be used to upgrade Myanmar’s defence capabilities.

Shortly before the Rohingya crisis began, Israel agreed to provide the Myanmar Navy with four or more Super-Dvora Mk III gunboats. Despite an international outcry against the sale, it went ahead, with the first two boats being delivered in April 2017. According to media reports, the contract is part of a broader defence relationship.

In some cases with foreign help, Myanmar’s defence industries are continuing to produce a wide range of arms and equipment, including armoured vehicles, missiles and naval vessels.

In March this year, it was announced that Ukrspecexport, Ukraine’s military import/export agency, had signed a joint venture agreement with Myanmar to build a plant capable of manufacturing BTR-4U wheeled armoured personnel carriers and 2S1U Gvozdika self-propelled howitzers. The new facility is due to start production in late 2020.

Myanmar has also been engaged in an active program of defence diplomacy. Senior Tatmadaw officers have made visits overseasand several high-ranking foreign officials have visited Myanmar.

Myanmar has participated in several naval exercises, including one with China in 2017, another with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (and 10 other invitees) the same year, and two more with India in 2018 and 2019. Warships from China, India and Russia have made port calls. Earlier this year, frigates from Vietnam and Brunei both made their first “friendship visits” to Myanmar. In March, a Myanmar Navy vessel attended the 70th anniversary celebrations for China’s PLA Navy.

All these developments underscore three enduring characteristics of Myanmar’s foreign relations and defence policies.

First, geostrategic and commercial considerations on the part of Myanmar’s neighbours and friends trump any concerns expressed over its violations of international law and universal human rights. China and India appear untroubled by the widespread condemnation of the Tatmadaw for its harsh treatment of the Rohingyas. Russia, the Ukraine and Israel are still prepared to sell arms to Myanmar if there is a profit to be made.

Second, even under Nobel Peace Prize laureate Aung San Suu Kyi, Myanmar is determined to decide its own policies and set its own priorities, regardless of international opinion. In these circumstances, and bearing in mind the support Myanmar receives in the UN and elsewhere from China and Russia, the international community is quite restricted in what it can do to hold Naypyidaw to account for its appalling treatment of the Rohingyas.

Third, regardless of the widespread condemnation of its military operations in Rakhine State, not to mention atrocities perpetrated in other parts of the country, the Tatmadaw is still able to secure funds for its ambitious arms acquisition program and the expansion of its military support facilities. Myanmar’s defence budget increased dramatically just before power was transferred to a quasi-civilian government in 2011, and has remained high ever since.

This is not to argue against continued efforts by governments and multilateral organisations to hold Myanmar to account for its actions. Even symbolic gestures are important to uphold the laws and principles of conduct that have been endorsed by the international community. Also, there is still much to be done in practical terms to assist the million or more Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh and elsewhere.

However, expectations regarding the outcomes of such measures must be tempered by an understanding of Myanmar’s intense nationalism and determination to conduct its own affairs, a position made easier by the readiness of some countries to help pariah states strengthen their coercive capabilities and escape retribution for unacceptable behaviour.
 
.
Myanmar is a mixture of Pakistan and North Korea tbh.

It is like Pakistan because the military uses religious sentiments and wants to turn Myanmar into some sort of religious entity like Pakistan army is trying hard to maintain the Islamic identity of Pakistan by funding mullahs.

It is like North Korea because of it's isolationist policy, it's desire to maintain a secretive regime and pro commie policy.

It is an open secret that most of the allies of China are either extremist states, communist states, dictator states and rogue military states
Let me tell you another secret. Most authoritarian states and terrorist organizations are supported or controlled by the US.

Need a list of links?

Of course, about China's foreign policy. we don't think it's necessary to explain to Uganda, Somalia, Congo, Sierra Leone, Zimbabwe, Bangladesh etc.



 
.
Let me tell you another secret. Most authoritarian states and terrorist organizations are supported or controlled by the US.

Need a list of links?

Of course, about China's foreign policy. we don't think it's necessary to explain to Uganda, Somalia, Congo, Sierra Leone, Zimbabwe, Bangladesh etc.


দেখেন এই বেটা কি বলে.

@UKBengali @bluesky @Doctor Strange
 
. .
Be brave. what do you want to say?
I was said 'look at what this man is telling'.

Most are, but not this one, your china support myanmar to excess the bay of bengal. How pathetic, sea is worth more than human life for china
I don't think so. China supported Myanmar since the 1950s. In fact Myanmar, Pakistan and North Korea are hardcore pro Chinese states.
 
.
Most are, but not this one, your china support myanmar to excess the bay of bengal. How pathetic, sea is worth more than human life for china

To this idiot that’s their priority. What you can expect from dirt poor people has become a developing country working in sweatshop by exploiting west, doing currency manipulation, stealing foreign tech, Intellectual property, persecuting minorities, controlling its people, supplying and supporting pariah state.

This two cent idiot is jobless. He can spend day and night here for posting one or two line comment as he gets 2 cent from communist party for each post.
 
.
Still when the evidence is overwhelming and widely covered by media, civilized countries take action against their army. US prosecuted the army men who took part in Abu Gharib prison torture. Pakistan and India have no courage to do that, because these countries are not democratic in nature.

India has prosecuted it's SFs and Police personnel hundreds of times, convicted and punished with life imprisonment and even capital punishment.
Google a little and you will find many of them.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom