Myanmar receives Thunders !

[HalfMoon]

only differences will be
capability of RAAD cruse missile
capability of DURANDAL anti runway missile launching
capability of MAR-1 missiles launching
capability of MAA misisle launching
capability of PIRANAH-2 missile launching
capability of TAKBIR JDAM style bombs launching
in case PAF worked then H-4 standoff launching capability too
in case PAF worked then HAFR RPB launching capability too
but no major changes its my guess sir . all these systems must needed software and hardware changes in thunder to be capable to use these weapons .

Wow. Seems like JF-17 is far superior to FC1.

 

[LKJ86]

only differences will be
capability of RAAD cruse missile
capability of DURANDAL anti runway missile launching
capability of MAR-1 missiles launching
capability of MAA misisle launching
capability of PIRANAH-2 missile launching
capability of TAKBIR JDAM style bombs launching
in case PAF worked then H-4 standoff launching capability too
in case PAF worked then HAFR RPB launching capability too
but no major changes its my guess sir . all these systems must needed software and hardware changes in thunder to be capable to use these weapons .

They are the some one.
There are no needs to develop two different ones at the same time, as PLAAF won't buy it.
If other countries want it, it will be changed on the JF-17B(i.e. FC-1B).

 

[Dazzler]

Where are the FC-1s, if you insist that they are different?

Notice comm antennae and ejection seat on ruby's. Compare them with jf17s.

 

[LKJ86]

Notice comm antennae and ejection seat on ruby's. Compare them with jf17s.

Answer my question: Where are the FC-1s?

 

[Dazzler]

Answer my question: Where are the FC-1s?

Reading issues?

 

[LKJ86]

Reading issues?

You say FC-1 and JF-17 are two different ones, so where are the FC-1s that have been developed?

 

[Tps43]

You say FC-1 and JF-17 are two different ones, so where are the FC-1s that have been developed?

Both are same just there sub system are diff .
One is in complete Chinese confg and other one is a mixture

 

[Dazzler]

You say FC-1 and JF-17 are two different ones, so where are the FC-1s that have been developed?

I clearly mentioned "specs", "subsystems." the one with purely Chinese systems is fc1. The aircraft is same, some systems r different.

 

[Imran Khan]

You say FC-1 and JF-17 are two different ones, so where are the FC-1s that have been developed?

They are in myanmar now a days

 

[HalfMoon]

You say FC-1 and JF-17 are two different ones, so where are the FC-1s that have been developed?

Why are you going in circles?

Countries which have good relations with the US & Europe like Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Srilanka, Malaysia etc. would opt for JF-17s while countries which are closer to China like Myanmar and North Korea would opt for FC-1

 

[Goku-kun]

You say FC-1 and JF-17 are two different ones, so where are the FC-1s that have been developed?

there aren't any fc-1s but countries which purchase directly from China gets fc-1 while which deal with Pakistan gets jf-17 which is more advanced and comes with local built electronics and avionics while buying from China means no Pakistani electronics/avionics.

 

[Imran Khan]

Wow. Seems like JF-17 is far superior to FC1.

also JF-17 use British made martin baker ejection seat cost 140.000$ per unit .

 

[LKJ86]

I clearly mentioned "specs", "subsystems." the one with purely Chinese systems is fc1. The aircraft is same, some systems r different.

So, which one is the fighter prototype of so-called JF-17, and which one is the fighter prototype of so-called FC-1?

 

[HalfMoon]

also JF-17 use British made martin baker ejection seat cost 140.000$ per unit .

Martin-Baker ejection seat is one of the best in the Business. India's Tejas too uses it.

 

[HalfMoon]

So, which one is the fighter prototype of so-called JF-17, and which one is the fighter prototype of so-called FC-1?

Fuselage is just a part of the fighter. There are many other sub-systems which differentiate the final fighter's capabilities.