What's new

Myanmar Defence Forum

Yak 130 of MAF.
FB_IMG_1510809137399.jpg

FB_IMG_1510809134079.jpg
 
. . .
According to Commander in chief FB ,today he met the vice president of Myanmar - Belarus Military Cooperation committee and Maj. Gen. Demidenko , first deputy chairman of state military industrial committee. the bold part is very new to me. it's also said they have many ongoing projects and discussed to improve its military relationship.
FB_IMG_1511891115368.jpg

Belarus is famous for its land system and AD system. so we can also hope for Belarus design Myanmar made land system for army in coming future. @tarpitz what do u think ?

how about this ?
Polonez 300mm MLRS
IMG_20171129_004542.jpg


this one was unveiled at 2015 and tested fire in at 2016. it can carry up to 8 guided rockets which can fire upto max range of 200km using GPS guidance system.

Myanmar wanted more advanced medium range MLRS system for long. if we can get even downgraded Myanmar version. not bad at all. we already got SY-400 for long range.
 
.
According to Commander in chief FB ,today he met the vice president of Myanmar - Belarus Military Cooperation committee and Maj. Gen. Demidenko , first deputy chairman of state military industrial committee. the bold part is very new to me. it's also said they have many ongoing projects and discussed to improve its military relationship.
View attachment 439603
Belarus is famous for its land system and AD system. so we can also hope for Belarus design Myanmar made land system for army in coming future. @tarpitz what do u think ?

how about this ?
Polonez 300mm MLRS
View attachment 439605


this one was unveiled at 2015 and tested fire in at 2016. it can carry up to 8 guided rockets which can fire upto max range of 200km using GPS guidance system.

Myanmar wanted more advanced medium range MLRS system for long. if we can get even downgraded Myanmar version. not bad at all. we already got SY-400 for long range.



Polonez 300mm MLRS = A200 MLRS Belarus Version, TOT from China but with better vehicle.


Good decision!

:tup:




 
Last edited:
.
Polonez 300mm MLRS = A200 MLRS Belarus Version, TOT from China but with better vehicle.


Good decision!

:tup:

yes.bro i forget to mention Polonez also used the same missiles of A-200. if so , buying directly from China would be better and cheaper option. :P

last day , Commander in chief met with Myanmar trainees in military special operation acadamy of China , under Southern Command.
FB_IMG_1511922614154.jpg

FB_IMG_1511922614154.jpg

IMG_20171129_090120.jpg

FB_IMG_1511922640068.jpg
 
.
According to Commander in chief FB ,today he met the vice president of Myanmar - Belarus Military Cooperation committee and Maj. Gen. Demidenko , first deputy chairman of state military industrial committee. the bold part is very new to me. it's also said they have many ongoing projects and discussed to improve its military relationship.
View attachment 439603
Belarus is famous for its land system and AD system. so we can also hope for Belarus design Myanmar made land system for army in coming future. @tarpitz what do u think ?

how about this ?
Polonez 300mm MLRS
View attachment 439605

this one was unveiled at 2015 and tested fire in at 2016. it can carry up to 8 guided rockets which can fire upto max range of 200km using GPS guidance system.

Myanmar wanted more advanced medium range MLRS system for long. if we can get even downgraded Myanmar version. not bad at all. we already got SY-400 for long range.


Myanmar Army is in the process of acquiring ToT to produce NVD night vision devices from Belarus.

One interesting point to notice here is that the general sitting in the centre is the Deputy Chief of Defence Industries (Heavy Industries). (DG Procurement wasn't there.)

It indicates that this meeting is rather more focusing on ToT production of something than the buying weapons.

Deputy chief is responsible for the production of heavy equipments like vehicles, APC, artillery and MLRS. He is also incharge for the production of optical devices & sights.

So my guess is NVD.

IMG_20171129_064636.png
 
.
Myanmar Army is in the process of acquiring ToT to produce NVD night vision devices from Belarus.

One interesting point to notice here is that the general sitting in the centre is the Deputy Chief of Defence Industries (Heavy Industries). (DG Procurement wasn't there.)

It indicates that this meeting is rather more focusing on ToT production of something than the buying weapons.

Deputy chief is responsible for the production of heavy equipments like vehicles, APC, artillery and MLRS. He is also incharge for the production of optical devices & sights.

So my guess is NVD.

View attachment 439727
yes. i see. that's why i said we may see Belarus designed Myanmar made Land systems in future. may be getting ToT for NVD. but my guess is more than that. lets list the things which can appear from Myanmar - Belarus Joint Military Cooperation.
1) Upgrading S-125s
there are huge amount of S-125 MRSAM in our inventory. but someof them are old and not reliable. if we can upgrade , it can turn into deadly AD system for our neighbour's tiny AF. :P Vietnam is recently upgraded their S-125 pechora to S-125 2TM standard with the help of Belarus.
2) Production raders
in here we can follow Vietnam way. even though it is not big like Vietnam's RV 01 and RV 02. as u know , the rader system of S-125 and some of other area are also outdated. raders from Belarus would be the answer.
that's what i think. plz add your opinions bro @tarpitz
bro @Nilgiri bro i also want yours too.
 
.
yes. i see. that's why i said we may see Belarus designed Myanmar made Land systems in future. may be getting ToT for NVD. but my guess is more than that. lets list the things which can appear from Myanmar - Belarus Joint Military Cooperation.
1) Upgrading S-125s
there are huge amount of S-125 MRSAM in our inventory. but someof them are old and not reliable. if we can upgrade , it can turn into deadly AD system for our neighbour's tiny AF. [emoji14] Vietnam is recently upgraded their S-125 pechora to S-125 2TM standard with the help of Belarus.
2) Production raders
in here we can follow Vietnam way. even though it is not big like Vietnam's RV 01 and RV 02. as u know , the rader system of S-125 and some of other area are also outdated. raders from Belarus would be the answer.
that's what i think. plz add your opinions bro @tarpitz
bro @Nilgiri bro i also want yours too.
Pechora 2M is S 125 2M. It is the upgraded version of S 125.

The only difference is that Vietnamese Pechora 2TM are ground based version and Myanmar Pechora 2M are mobile system. The rest of the system are almost the same. So Myn Pechora 2M have better survivablity.
 
.
yes. i see. that's why i said we may see Belarus designed Myanmar made Land systems in future. may be getting ToT for NVD. but my guess is more than that. lets list the things which can appear from Myanmar - Belarus Joint Military Cooperation.
1) Upgrading S-125s
there are huge amount of S-125 MRSAM in our inventory. but someof them are old and not reliable. if we can upgrade , it can turn into deadly AD system for our neighbour's tiny AF. [emoji14] Vietnam is recently upgraded their S-125 pechora to S-125 2TM standard with the help of Belarus.
2) Production raders
in here we can follow Vietnam way. even though it is not big like Vietnam's RV 01 and RV 02. as u know , the rader system of S-125 and some of other area are also outdated. raders from Belarus would be the answer.
that's what i think. plz add your opinions bro @tarpitz
bro @Nilgiri bro i also want yours too.
Pechora 2TM of Vietnam
IMG_20171129_225807.png



Pechora 2M of Mryanmar.
duyetbinh_kienthuc%20(5)_awct.jpg

mmmilitary%2B2013%2B(1).jpg

PechoraMissile-Radar.jpg
 
.
yes. i see. that's why i said we may see Belarus designed Myanmar made Land systems in future. may be getting ToT for NVD. but my guess is more than that. lets list the things which can appear from Myanmar - Belarus Joint Military Cooperation.
1) Upgrading S-125s
there are huge amount of S-125 MRSAM in our inventory. but someof them are old and not reliable. if we can upgrade , it can turn into deadly AD system for our neighbour's tiny AF. :P Vietnam is recently upgraded their S-125 pechora to S-125 2TM standard with the help of Belarus.
2) Production raders
in here we can follow Vietnam way. even though it is not big like Vietnam's RV 01 and RV 02. as u know , the rader system of S-125 and some of other area are also outdated. raders from Belarus would be the answer.
that's what i think. plz add your opinions bro @tarpitz
bro @Nilgiri bro i also want yours too.

Nowadays Russians always want to push their new product instead and Israelis are way too pricey on upgrades they offer. Poland is also headed that way, seeing how they got the pricey euro exchange rate as well.

So I like this idea of upgrade using other Eastern Europe options esp if you already have cooperation/collaboration going (yay for discounts). I think Ukraine, Serbia and couple others have modules on offer along with Belarus. MM definitely approach and negotiate for best one...definitely extend use of every asset you have. Use the savings to improve your C4I network, that backbone will always be the most important thing long term compared to the end-module assets.

If you have a good stockpile of the missiles themselves (I believe their shelf life certification is quite long), you can approach Indian/Russian/Ukraine navy etc to see if its feasible to integrate them on future warships MM decides upon (Volna system I believe)....it will save money if the stockpile is large and you see little reason for premium AA on ships....especially if the command and control is of newer generation.
 
.
Nowadays Russians always want to push their new product instead and Israelis are way too pricey on upgrades they offer. Poland is also headed that way, seeing how they got the pricey euro exchange rate as well.

So I like this idea of upgrade using other Eastern Europe options esp if you already have cooperation/collaboration going (yay for discounts). I think Ukraine, Serbia and couple others have modules on offer along with Belarus. MM definitely approach and negotiate for best one...definitely extend use of every asset you have. Use the savings to improve your C4I network, that backbone will always be the most important thing long term compared to the end-module assets.

If you have a good stockpile of the missiles themselves (I believe their shelf life certification is quite long), you can approach Indian/Russian/Ukraine navy etc to see if its feasible to integrate them on future warships MM decides upon (Volna system I believe)....it will save money if the stockpile is large and you see little reason for premium AA on ships....especially if the command and control is of newer generation.

Well no need for MM to go down other ASEAN routes, who opt for premium western system. Their economy cant sustain that kind of spending yet.
 
. . . .
Back
Top Bottom