What's new

Myanmar army chief says Rohingya Muslims 'not natives,' numbers fleeing exaggerated

Homo Sapiens

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
9,641
Reaction score
-1
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Bangladesh
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...umbers-fleeing-exaggerated-idUSKBN1CH0I6?il=0
#World News
October 12, 2017 / 2:22 PM / Updated 13 minutes ago
Myanmar army chief says Rohingya Muslims 'not natives,' numbers fleeing exaggerated
Robert Birsel, Wa Lone

YANGON (Reuters) - Rohingya Muslims are not native to Myanmar, the army chief told the U.S. ambassador in a meeting in which he apparently did not address accusations of abuses by his men and said media was complicit in exaggerating the number of refugees fleeing.

FILE PHOTO: Myanmar's General Min Aung Hlaing takes part during a parade to mark the 72nd Armed Forces Day in the capital Naypyitaw, Myanmar March 27, 2017. REUTERS/Soe Zeya Tun
The U.N. human rights office said on Wednesday Myanmar forces had brutally driven out half a million Rohingya from northern Rakhine state to Bangladesh in recent weeks, torching homes, crops and villages to prevent them from returning.

Thousands of Rohingya were leaving the state on Thursday, aiming to reach Bangladesh by boat, citing a shortage of food and fear of repression, residents said. A Myanmar official said people were leaving but he dismissed the suggestion hunger and intimidation were factors.

The army chief, Senior General Min Aung Hlaing, gave his most extensive account of the Rohingya refugee crisis aimed at an international audience in the meeting with Ambassador Scot Marciel, according to a report posted on his Facebook page.

The general is the most powerful person in Buddhist-majority Myanmar and his apparently uncompromising stance would indicate little sensitivity about the military’s image over a crisis that has drawn international condemnation and raised questions about a transition to democracy under Nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi.

The military campaign is popular in Myanmar, where there is little sympathy for the mostly stateless Rohingya, and where Buddhist nationalism has surged.

Min Aung Hlaing, referring to Rohingya by the term “Bengali”, which they regard as derogatory, said British colonialists were responsible for the problem.

“The Bengalis were not taken into the country by Myanmar, but by the colonialists,” he told Marciel, according to the account of the meeting posted on Thursday.

“They are not the natives.”


Coordinated Rohingya insurgent attacks on some 30 security posts on Aug. 25 sparked a ferocious military response.

The U.N. rights office said in its report, based on 65 interviews with Rohingya who had arrived in Bangladesh, that abuses had begun before the Aug. 25 attacks and included killings, torture and rape of children.

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley last month denounced a “brutal, sustained campaign to cleanse the country of an ethnic minority” and called on countries to suspend providing weapons to Myanmar until its military put sufficient accountability measures in place.

The European Union and the United States are considering targeted sanctions against Myanmar’s military leaders, officials familiar with the discussions said this week.

Suu Kyi was swept into office last year after winning an election, but the military holds immense power, including exclusive say over security.

‘FEEL INSECURE’

U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra‘ad al-Hussein has described the government operations as “a textbook example of ethnic cleansing” and said the action appeared to be “a cynical ploy to forcibly transfer large numbers of people without possibility of return”.

Min Aung Hlaing did not refer to such accusations, according to the published account, but said the insurgents had killed 90 Hindus and 30 Rohingya linked to the government.

Insurgent opposition to a citizenship verification campaign, which used the term Bengali, was behind the Aug. 25 attacks that sparked the violence, he said.

“Local Bengalis were involved in the attacks under the leadership of ARSA. That is why they might have fled as they feel insecure,” he said, referring to the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army insurgents.

“The native place of Bengalis is really Bengal,” he said.


He said it was an exaggeration to say a “very large” number were fleeing to Bangladesh and there had been “instigation and propaganda by using the media from behind the scene”.

He did not elaborate but said the “real situation” had to be relayed to the international community. U.N. political affairs chief Jeffrey Feltman is due to visit on Friday.

Rohingya residents of Rakhine said up to 10,000 people had left on Wednesday and Thursday.

One resident, a teacher, said there had been no military offensive recently but people were going.

“There’s no work, nowhere to get food and the government isn’t helping,” said the teacher, who, like the first resident, declined to be identified.

Rakhine state’s secretary, Tin Maung Swe, said people were leaving “every day” to join relatives already in Bangladesh.

”Nobody is starving in death in Myanmar. The government is trying to support those in need,“ he said. ”They can fish or catch shrimps in the creeks near their villages.

“No one’s killing them or intimidating them.”

Suu Kyi, in a televised address, spoke about the importance of humanitarian assistance for all people in Rakhine and said the government would accept refugees back.

She said aid groups, international organizations and Myanmar expatriates would help with the long-term development of the state. She did not refer to accusations of rights abuses by the army.
 
.
The military campaign is popular in Myanmar, where there is little sympathy for the mostly stateless Rohingya, and where Buddhist nationalism has surged.

Min Aung Hlaing, referring to Rohingya by the term “Bengali”, which they regard as derogatory, said British colonialists were responsible for the problem.

“The Bengalis were not taken into the country by Myanmar, but by the colonialists,” he told Marciel, according to the account of the meeting posted on Thursday.

“They are not the natives.”
Even if we accept the burmese army chief's allegation of Rohingya being British import in Arakan, my question to Indian and Chinese cheerleader of burmese position, if Rohingya had to leave their home for the crime of their forefather migrated to their present location, are they also willing to accept the large Indian and Chinese community living in Malaysia,Singapore, South Africa and other countries whom British took during their colonial rule? if those country decide to kick away them to China and India despite living there for several generation?Will they think, it is perfectly normal thing to do?
 
Last edited:
.
Even if we accept the burmese army chief's allegation of Rohingya being British import in Arakan, my question to Indian and Chinese cheerleader of burmese position, if Rohingya had to leave their home for the crime of their forefather migrated to their present location, are they also willing to accept the large Indian and Chinese community living in Malaysia,Singapore, Indonesia and other countries whom British took during their colonial rule, if those country decide to kick away them to China and India despite living there for several generation?Will they think, it is perfectly normal thing to do?


Please do not encourage trolls.
They would say yes just to score a point!

This vile man needs to be captured and put on trial asap.
 
.
UNHCR and other global organization observed and recorded how many Rohingya were there and how many moved to Bangladesh. This was and is done hour by hour if not in shorter duration. Genocidal regime claim has NO credibility or value.

Rohingya has more than 1000 years history living in Arakan much longer than buddhist living there. Myanmar genocidal regime has nothing to stand on.
 
. . .
if Rohingya had to leave their home for the crime of their forefather migrated to their present location, are they also willing to accept the large Indian and Chinese community living in Malaysia,Singapore, South Africa and other countries whom British took during their colonial rule? if those country decide to kick away them to China and India despite living there for several generation?Will they think, it is perfectly normal thing to do?
Yes, we will receive them if they are kicked out by the government. We will accept them, we had done that in the past. We will do that in the future. As long as they don't create trouble in India we are ok with them.

We accepted many refugees and still takes many.

India previously took in Myanmari Indians when similar ethnic cleansing was done by Military junta.

Its time to file complaint in ICC.
ICJ
 
. .
Even if we accept the burmese army chief's allegation of Rohingya being British import in Arakan, my question to Indian and Chinese cheerleader of burmese position, if Rohingya had to leave their home for the crime of their forefather migrated to their present location, are they also willing to accept the large Indian and Chinese community living in Malaysia,Singapore, South Africa and other countries whom British took during their colonial rule? if those country decide to kick away them to China and India despite living there for several generation?Will they think, it is perfectly normal thing to do?

a lot of countries have kicked out Indians and Chinese. a lot of countries discriminate against Indian and Chinese

FYI Chinese are majority in Singapore. I do not think anyone is kicking them out

Welcome to the real world
 
.
Myanmar does have a point. The Rohingya people look more like Bangladeshis than Myanmarese but they don't have any right to oppress them.

Anyway, I think the Bangladeshis are learning a harsh lesson being Indian Poodles for 46-years and getting zero support in return.
 
.
Myanmar does have a point. The Rohingya people look more like Bangladeshis than Myanmarese but they don't have any right to oppress them.
many Afghans look like Pakistanis. I suppose, on that ground Afghanistan can disown their citizens and let Pakistan give them citizenship.
 
.
are they also willing to accept the large Indian and Chinese community living in Malaysia,Singapore, South Africa and other countries whom British took during their colonial rule?

They should consider themselves lucky their mother-country isn't puny benglardesh who can't even must the slightest strength to punish MM. Hell you couldn't even stop importing rice and steel from them.
 
Last edited:
. .
Myanmar does have a point. The Rohingya people look more like Bangladeshis than Myanmarese but they don't have any right to oppress them.

Anyway, I think the Bangladeshis are learning a harsh lesson being Indian Poodles for 46-years and getting zero support in return.

If Bangladesh was East Pakistan there is nothing Pakistan could have done either

Awami cheer leaders @BDforever @Homo Sapiens @Russell @UKBengali should answer that.

you should answer - what is more important ?? 1 million Rohingyas or 160 million Bangladeshis
 
.
you should answer - what is more important ?? 1 million Rohingyas or 160 million Bangladeshis

nice try BUT choice is not between "1 million Rohingyas or 160 million Bangladeshis" as indian genocidal mentality would stage it. Real choice is importing from Myanmar vs importing from 10s of different other countries.

I don't represent indian stooge awami regime. indian al cowda brigade can reveal its secret advice to awami regime. OR Awami cheer leaders @BDforever @Homo Sapiens @Russell @UKBengali @mohammed Khaled@bluesky can answer that.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom