Then what is point of you even expressing your opinions if you are not going to consider the possibility that you are wrong when others presented their opinions and sources to back them up? Do you even know how to debate? So now you admitted that you do not consider others' opinions and their sources, but you have the gall to accuse me of this...
You need to make up your mind. Either be reasonable enough to at the very least read others' arguments, and no one demands that you believe them. Or do not enter any debate AT ALL if you refuse to perform this courtesy.
I never said I do not read your answers or arguments. I believe my answers show this.
I did say I am not going to read your previous posts about RCS etc. And I said I am not interested in sources especially because of the inherent bias risk and how they can be taken out of context.
The way you and I use the same ref. (i.e. the lightweight fighter mafia), we do it in very different ways. I was merely trying to tell you that these guys don't use sources for their critic the way you think necessary either. And they are of some stature in the aviation industry.
And ..well ofcourse I accused you of sounding like a spokesperson because.. well you do ...
I have sat through a couple of LM presentations and .. some of their key presenters were ..less enthusiastic than you are..
One of them was fairly recently actually.. can't tell you where, but I can tell you when .. let's say last december, you can figure out the rest.
Also I can tell you that the listeners where not that keen on the F-35 either...
To be honest.. although it was pushed forward as the only logical option, the audience was more than interested in getting key information on the F-22. Despite the clear statement that the F-22 is not up for export, a great number of questions was clearly aimed at the F-22 and hypothetical scenarios of acquisition FMS, and funding...