Muslims should relocate to countries where Sharia laws are in force:BJP MP Yogi Adiyanath

[xyxmt]

What's wrong with Sharia law ?

it scares the shit out of non-muslims

Yes I will call them up tomorrow and schedule a meeting for Sunday.

On a serious note do you really think these dirt poor 180 million Muslims of India can dis integrate India? Common man you North western Muslims are supposed to be smarter than lower caste Muslims of India.

very well said, any Indian want to argue the state of Indian muslims now?
remember those were the richest and more educated of muslims in subcontinent before partition...it does prove something

 

[Moon]

Yes I will call them up tomorrow and schedule a meeting for Sunday.

On a serious note do you really think these dirt poor 180 million Muslims of India can dis integrate India? Common man you North western Muslims are supposed to be smarter than lower caste Muslims of India.

Tsk Tsk tsk, before partition we were the "dirty, poor and weak" Muslims, you know what happened then. History has a cruel nature of repeating itself, especially from those who failed to learn from her. I'll stick with what I've said earlier, instead of snazzy comments, do try and understand what I've written.

 

[B+ Dracula]

What's wrong with Sharia law ?

That the question i wanna ask from you...?
a) What is your definition of Sharia law?
b) How it's hazardous to the national integrity?
c) How much damaged it has caused you in the past?
.
But i know i'll get some Bollywood type of answer, there is a hell of a difference b/t Screen play and reality

 

[Moon]

No actually Muslims of North West were wealthy. And the rich ones from here migrated to Pakistan. Almost every family in Pak owns a firearm. What will Muslims in here fight with? Kitchen knives. Unless your planning to send 180 million Ak47s to India. @xyxmt
It's not only Hindus but every other religious community who dislikes Muslims. True story.

Do you know, how the natives of the sub continent who rebelled against the British found their arms? Especially in the later years of the British Raj?. Forget violence, that's too far away, even a boycott can devastate India, or non- cooperation. Or civil disobedience.
As for what you stated to xymt, isn't there a Hindu Christian rift going on?.

 

[ranjeet]

Or take their lands, and implement Sharia there.

Considering how former Indian Muslims who took their lands for a separate country failed to implement Sharia, I doubt this lot would be any different.

 

[Moon]

Considering how former Indian Muslims who took their lands for a separate country failed to implement Sharia, I doubt this lot would be any different.

But they live in a far better state than Indian Muslims, and even most Indians. No?.

 

[ranjeet]

But they live in a far better state than Indian Muslims, and even most Indians. No?.

Highly debatable but that's not the topic at hand.

 

[Moon]

Civil obedience or non-cooperation did not work against British. Why would u think it will work now? Muslims quitting their jobs. Their loss. Muslims not paying taxes. Well their contribution is insignificant. If jain community which is less than 0.5% wouldnt pay taxes then it would make a difference but Muslims just live off welfare they dont contribute towards the economy.

Christians rather live in Hindu country than a Muslim country. Christians of Kerala fed up with Muslim appeasement are joining BJP.


Yes they do. But they were supposed open their borders for Indian Muslims too.☺

Non-cooperation led to much larger representation of the natives of the sub-continent. It even led to the reverse of the partition of Bengal, it also lead to more native workers gaining administrative jobs. And reserved seats in election (this although did not come from non-cooperation, but from say "knocking harder on the door") so all in all non-cooperation led to the independence of the sub-continent.
Last time I remember, many were stopped from exiting India, and massacres of Muslims coming to Pakistan in trains, intimidated many as India was not protecting the migrants, and in some cases joined in their massacre.

@AkshayS and about the Christians, they are supposed to be supporting BJP, but I see something else here:
http://m.timesofindia.com/city/mumb...on-churches-in-Delhi/articleshow/46177776.cms
http://earthdispatch.com/church-burned-delhi-india-christians-protest.html
http://www1.cbn.com/churchandministry/christians-protest-anti-conversion-bill-in-gujarat-india

 

[pak-marine]

Fair enough those who want
Sharia airdrop them in baghdadis land

 

[Kompromat]

Indian Muslims are not going anywhere, they will outnumber Hindus eventually. That is why we left them there to begin with.

 

[ifesvr]

@AkshayS and about the Christians, they are supposed to be supporting BJP, but I see something else here:

Why are you posting news from last year, Feb 2015? its actually interesting that the attacks and protests took place just before the local elections and stopped after AAP won.

 

[AugenBlick]

Hindus are going to pay one day... I just hope I will be long dead.

 

[halupridol]

Hindu dharma khatre mein

 

[Soulspeek]

I dont usually subscribe to his POV but this time, he is right. The Constitution of India supercedes any other laws or customs.

• Home
• >
• INDIA
• >
• Muslims should relocate to countries where Sharia laws are in force: Yogi Adiyanath

Muslims should relocate to countries where Sharia laws are in force: Yogi Adiyanath
By:PTI|Last Updated:Monday, 18 April 2016 7:48 AM

0

TOTAL SHARES

Ballia: Controversial BJP MP Yogi Adiyanath on Sunday said Muslims should “relocate” to the countries where the Shariat law is in force as he asserted that India will not be run according to that system, comments that came in wake of the AIMPLB claiming that attempts are being made to “interfere” in Shariat law through courts.

“Muslims should relocate to the countries where Shariat laws are in force.

“The country will be run according to the Constitution and the legal system and not according to Shariat law,” the Gorakhpur MP told reporters here.

The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) has alleged that attempts are being made to “interfere” in Shariat laws through courts and appealed to the Centre to maintain its earlier stand on the matter.

AIMPLB member Zafar Jinali alleged courts’ “interference” in Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act.

His remarks came weeks after the Supreme Court sought the Centre’s response to a plea challenging the constitutionality of Muslim practices of polygamy, triple talaq (talaq-e-bidat) and nikah halala.


http://www.abplive.in/india-news/mu...re-sharia-laws-in-force-yogi-adiyanath-324255

If they are so adamant on implementation of Shariah laws. Dont prosecute muslims under IPC. Cut their hands for theft. Beheading for murder! No need to give them jail sentences like civilized world.