What's new

Muslims masquerade as Hindus for India jobs

Nobody asked for concession. The topic is hatred and bigotry among the masses about muslims.

Cant you understand? buddy ,pathetic..In India even hindus face discrimination in some parts of India and also from muslims.But it is end at that way.It is not a big problem like you exaggerating.In some cases if muslims experiences more hatred it is because of some lunatics graduated from madrassahs of our western neighbour carries attack in India in the name of religion calling themselves are real muslims.
Do you know muslims ,Hindus ,christains etc from "Bhatkal' experience a problem ?If any person from Bhatkal whether it is muslim.hindus or christians experienced a discrimination in other parts of India.Persons from Bhatkal irrespective their religion dont get houses at rent ,apartment other opportunities etc.Do you know why?Some self proclaimed pure muslims like Riyaz Bhatkal,Yasin Bhatkal and Iqbal bhatkal
is come from these town called 'Bhatkal' and graduated from madrassahs in land of pure at western side and carries attack India.They are muslims ,so muslims expereinced more problem.But all person from Bhatkal town expereince this problem more less irrespective of their religion.
 
From 27% Hindus to literally <1% hindus in your country.

your a fucking joke :lol:

This is not a thread about ISLAMIC republic of Pakistan. Of course, Indians might attempt to save their face by derailing it...




I donno about your "claims" from what I know, WEST Pakistan has always been a majority Muslim state. I donno where delusional Indians pull these figures from.
 
A bengali can tell the difference, other Indians(non bengali) not so much. So they stereotype for most parts, Bengali Muslim= Bangladeshi, Bengali Hindu= Indian.

What about if a Bangladeshi was speaking Hindi? Can you tell the difference?

Like a Westerner can't tell the difference if a Cantonese/Hokkien/Mandarin speaker was speaking English, they all sound "East Asian" to them. But for us, it is very easy to tell (basically Cantonese speak English like Jackie Chan, and Mandarin speakers speak English like Yao Ming).
 
I don't see anywhere in the article that these guys were denied job because they hated hindus. It is because of their religion. Their name. Like that lady who is working in the hospital.

I know muslims who doesnt allow Hindu workers.... Does that means all muslims in india are like that? Do not generalise indian population based on few people/incidents.... It would be as stupid as some one generalising entire population of pakistan based on few terrorist activities.
 
It just goes to show how much of a fraud secularism in India is.


The only thing it shows is your ignorance. As pointed out by @acid rain, the laws protect Muslims(or anyone else) from being discriminated by the state or in the organised sector. Really stupid to assume that individuals operating in the unorganised sector will necessarily follow every practice. You need to have an understanding of what secularism is before mouthing off on fraud & the like. Secularism is a state attribute, not that of individuals. How can a Hindu or Muslim be secular, i.e. treat all religions equally? Tolerance is not to be confused with secularism.
 
I know muslims who doesnt allow Hindu workers.... Does that means all muslims in india are like that? Do not generalise indian population based on few people/incidents.... It would be as stupid as some one generalising entire population of pakistan based on few terrorist activities.

Can we judge secular India by the man who committed genocide of Muslims in Gujarat and is now running for the PM of India and this guy has the support of Indian vote bank?


Americans wont even want get caught dead near such a "secular" personality.....lololoolol
 
Its the Bangladeshi Muslim who have this issue, I have hardly seen ANY Indian muslim working with a fake name or have worked as servant anywhere, not at least in a Hindu familiy, so there is no discrimination.
 
The only thing it shows is your ignorance. As pointed out by @acid rain, the laws protect Muslims(or anyone else) from being discriminated by the state or in the organised sector. Really stupid to assume that individuals operating in the unorganised sector will necessarily follow every practice. You need to have an understanding of what secularism is before mouthing off on fraud & the like. Secularism is a state attribute, not that of individuals. How can a Hindu or Muslim be secular, i.e. treat all religions equally? Tolerance is not to be confused with secularism.



Has your effective judiciary caught the man behind gujjerat genocide of Muslims for the last 17 years?

The last time I checked that man was running for the PM of India...

Secular much? Lololoolol

Indians are delusional and expect others to get fooled by their delusions.
 
Can we judge secular India by the man who committed genocide of Muslims in Gujarat and is now running for the PM of India and this guy has the support of Indian vote bank?

Commited genocide? No proof required eh? We are a nation of laws and he has not been found guilty. In any case, he is not running for the PM's post on an anti-Muslim ideology but on a developmental one. India is not America though quite a lot of people who do get elected in the U.S. would be laughed off in so many places.
 
Has your effective judiciary caught the man behind gujjerat genocide of Muslims for the last 17 years?

The last time I checked that man was running for the PM of India...

Secular much? Lololoolol

Indians are delusional and expect others to get fooled by their delusions.


If You haven't been arrested for murder, would it be fair to suggest that it is because you have not been caught. He has never been accused of "commiting" any genocide, the maximum accusation is of ommission, a failure of duties & maybe looking the other way. It remains an accusation, not proven. He cannot be " caught" to please you.
 
If You haven't been arrested for murder, would it be fair to suggest that it is because you have not been caught. He has never been accused of "commiting" any genocide, the maximum accusation is of ommission, a failure of duties & maybe looking the other way. It remains an accusation, not proven. He cannot be " caught" to please you.




The Americans would disagree with you.
 
Awwww. And finally you managed to justify once again this 'TWO NATION THEORY'. Congrats. :tup:

Such desperate bunch of people you guyz are who seek solace by showing everyone how suppressed muslims in India are and how right were we by seperating against them.

By the way its part of a social evil and not limited to Muslims per se. Every sect, religion, caste face some injustice or the other but you only care bout Muslims. Right. as I say congrats for once again showing your insecurity of 2 nation theory. By the way that theory has proved flawed 4 decades back and rejected thruout the world. You can stay with it for another 4 decades but then too you will be confused about your identity as now. :)
 
A random Hindu speaking for the Muslims in his country. More "secularism" from Indians. Indian like to live in their delusions so they make stuff up, like habitual liars.



So India is more terrible than we thought, Thank you correcting the OP then..

Yes,,,ur right,,,,,we r terrible,,,,,we are not as advanced,,,coz we r missing the DRONES,,BLASTS,,etc etc ,,,so Yes,,,,ur Right !:enjoy:
 
The Americans would disagree with you.

The Americans probably won't. In any case, it doesn't matter. The PM of India cannot be denied a visa, I don't give a damn what happens to Modi if he isn't the PM. The Americans, unlike you, understand the concept of the due process of law. You still don't understand the basis of secularism. We may be guilty of poor judiciary, poor many things but that is hardly something that is connected to secularism. Even Mr.Modi, when & if elected, will have to follow the constitution. That remains secular whether or not Mr. Modi has those inclinations.
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom