Stumper
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 1,226
- Reaction score
- 0
Mate: Are you doing this deliberately? ... I explained to you that being a acting CM he cant be impeached by the central government. And that Presidential orders are needed. I also explained that he cant be impeached because you dont have one to testify.Why do you put Clinton in the same category as Modi? Clinton didn't aid or abet the killings of American citizens, but Modi aided & abetted the killings of Indian citizens.
Oh, we went one step ahead. the SIT asked for people (read Government officials who can testify that Modi asked them to go slow) to come forward and testify. We had none. Had anyone claimed before the SIT that he received orders from Modi, that would have been end of Mr.Modi rule. At best, we can only accuse that Mr.Modi took the riots less seriously.No one is ready to testify yet because there hasn't been a trial in court against Modi. You shall see a lot of people testify against him once you start a trial.
Nonsense. If anything, the people and activists have been more vocal about it then muslims themselves.The problem with India is, they want to put the Gujarat massacres under the carpet, as they believe it is a sensitive issue; they don't even want to talk about it publicly, forget a trial.
Please share it with us. I will be more than happy to share that with SIT.There has been plenty of video evidence that Modi aided & abetted the Hindutva groups that massacred the Muslims. There is much more than a shred of evidence.