Imran Khan
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2007
- Messages
- 68,815
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
we will never allow indian muslims to come here
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We promise no Altaf Hussian in the new lot.we will never allow indian muslims to come here
and we know most of them are more altaf then real altafWe promise no Altaf Hussian in the new lot.
and we know most of them are more altaf then real altaf
New Delhi:Slamming Jains for their insistence on banning sale of meat during their festival 'Paryushan', the Shiv Sena on Thursday said the community's stance on practicing "non-violence" comes as a surprise now as they purportedly supported violence during the 1993 riots in the city.
The party accused the Jains of doing a volte-face for altering their position on "non-violence".
"Until now, only fanatic Muslims used to bully people in the name of religion. If the Jains too are going on the path of Muslims, then God save them. During the 1992-93 Mumbai riots, Marathis had protected Jains, who were saved because violence had been answered by violence. At that time too 'Paryushan' was on. But Jains were at the forefront of supporting violence then," the Sena said in an edit in its mouthpiece 'Saamana'.
FILE PIC: AFP
"Scores of Jains used to come to Matoshree then and thank (late Sena Supremo) Balasahab then for helping them. Today these people talking about non-violence...It’s surprising. What caused this sudden change of heart?" the Sena questioned.
The party said that it needs to be made clear what does violence exactly mean.
"Does only banning slaughter of animals mean non-violence? Violence is in the mind and in the action. Are Jain brothers free from this kind of violence? Many builders in the city are Jains where the game of black and white money is being played. Accepting black money too is a sin. Will Jains stop taking black money in this festival?" the Sena said.
Image courtesy: Facebook
A line in thecontroversial articlesaid that "Muslims at least have the land of Pakistan to go to but if such rituals of Jains keep continuing then which land would they take shelter in?"
A still from the Saamana article: Jainon, Musalmaano Ki Raah Mat Jao (Jains, do not follow the path of Muslims)
It said that to think that only Jains are vegetarians was wrong.
In Maharashtra Brahmins, in Gujarat Patels and Maheshwaris, in Haryana Vaishnavas, at Karnataka and Maharashtra border Lingayats and a large section of people in MP and Rajasthan are vegetarians but nobody has ever demanded a ban on meat sale, the Sena said.
"Do not provoke Maharashtra in the name of Paryushan. Believe in the mantra of live and let live and let people eat what they want to," the Sena said.
ABP Live - English News, Today’s Latest Breaking News in English, Online English News
I never said anything about Parsis.
And since you bring them up, we are definitely a whole lot more "son of the soil" when it comes specifically to Mumbai, which let's face it, was built by us (as was Karachi), compared to the much more recent Jain community.
The message is different though, and it would be great if everyone understands it.
There is only one power center in Mumbai, and you buck it at your peril.
Look beyond the stupid current fracas to really get to the meat of the issue (pun coincidental).
we will never allow indian muslims to come here
and also you keep them there please sir jee . take altaf back and we will give you AJK in bonusImran bhai, it makes me feel nice and proud to hear that.
Saare jahan se accha
Hindustan hamara ........
You, me, guru and altaf bhai should have a nice whisky session one day.
then what did you mean by son of the soil?
you are endorsing such a waste human being likes of uddhav thakre who says he will decide who will live in India and who not and someone who does not go by his thinking will have to leave India.
and you are glorifying his statement tells me what kind of person you are.
tell me one more thing shiv sena is in mejority in BMC and they are the one who has the power to implement such ban then why did they let it pass in the first place?
I am a Sainik.
Maybe that should answer you best.
So it means you endorse whatever comes out of his backside without using a bit of your brain?
I endorse what he said.
And I can assure you, and it will be backed by other seniors here, that I have adequate brains.
like who?
I endorse what he said.
And I can assure you, and it will be backed by other seniors here, that I have adequate brains.
I'm sorry, is this discussion going somewhere?
You seem hurt about something.
just conduct a poll here and ask those members who other endorses following statement of his.
"Muslims at least have Pakistan, where will you take shelter?"