Sinnerman108
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
- Messages
- 8,994
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
removing the unrelated parts. they moved on the name of religon and religon did not had enough force to keep them together. they again got separated in 71 and continue to kill one another.
Its not some muslims cannot live with hindus those kinda muslims cannot live even with muslims.
Again, incorrect.
Bangladesh is a Muslims country as is Pakistan.
The two nation theory still holds true, There is a Hindu nation and a Muslims nation.
so why dont you migrate to saudi and live by shariah and stop going to other countries to spread this rabid disease
Can't you see my flags ?
and be careful when you reply too fast.
you are referring to a religion as rabid disease ... is that what people who call them selves muslims told you ? or is your own discovery ?
Slight correction here. Hindus dont believe Idols are Gods. On the contrary, Hindus believe that idols are a manifestation of the ONE supreme being - Brahman. Idols are simply a way to represent that ONE Brahman in a way that different people with different cultures and traditions etc can relate and pray to.
Why should the religious law supersede the common law? Religious laws have been rigid and havent changed through time. So why should anyone follow those obsolete laws in a time when the world is changing rapidly?
What "Migration" you be talking about? Do you even know what migration means?
With all the "Good Muslims" having left India for Pakistan, why is Pakistan's condition so bad today? And why Indian Muslims are better off than Pakistanis? Says a lot about your ideologies and priorities, no?
This is precisely the point that started the debate.
For a muslims establishment of shariah ( religious law) is supreme to any thing else.
all laws pertaining to economy, civil affairs etc etc etc have to be made subject to the supreme religious law.