Muslim women praise ‘Imam-e-Hind’ Shri Ram

[friendly_troll96]

Correction: Indian Muslim women. They say you are what you eat.

 

[kaku1]

I always try to learn and try to talk straight and never have any intention to hurt anyone.

 

[Hindustani78]

The Raja Shahi never invaded India. What sorcery is this! @Joe Shearer

I am talking about the wars between the Afghan tribes.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Their "history" is completely different. In their history, Kings followed "Dharma", never looted or pillaged enemy kingdoms, never killed the innocents etc. It was a big happy family and all the ills that ever existed then and now are gifted by invaders...

History is history. The history taught in Saraswati Vidya Mandirs for example teach the same CBSE curriculum. The differences between Islamic and (say) Portuguese invasion and the infighting among Indian states are recorded and accepted. Even by what you may call 'Leftist' historians. That is why the Islamic invasions are considered part of a different era. Same with the Inquisition for example. You can blame the Sangh for allegedly overplaying the foreign invasion. But an outright denial and even drawing an equivalence? No historian will do that.

I am talking about the wars between the Afghan tribes.

Ok.

But it was taken by our resident here as proof of how vile Indians were to each other. Never mind.

 

[kaku1]

History is history. The history taught in Saraswati Vidya Mandirs for example teach the same CBSE curriculum. The differences between Islamic and (say) Portuguese invasion and the infighting among Indian states are recorded and accepted. Even by what you may call 'Leftist' historians. That is why the Islamic invasions are considered part of a different era. Same with the Inquisition for example. You can blame the Sangh for allegedly overplaying the foreign invasion. But an outright denial and even drawing an equivalence? No historian will do that.


.

Yes.because there are POVs even in histories.

 

[jaatram]

Here is the last secular citadel of Right wing India under Modi talking about Temples in one of the secular state of India.

208 temples damaged in Kashmir in last two decades: Kashmir govt

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Yes.because there are POVs even in histories.

Yeah and trust me, I had no clue about it. It's something called historiography. Thanks to Joe saab here.

 

[The_Showstopper]

History is history. The history taught in Saraswati Vidya Mandirs for example teach the same CBSE curriculum. The differences between Islamic and (say) Portuguese invasion and the infighting among Indian states are recorded and accepted. Even by what you may call 'Leftist' historians. That is why the Islamic invasions are considered part of a different era. Same with the Inquisition for example. You can blame the Sangh for allegedly overplaying the foreign invasion. But an outright denial and even drawing an equivalence? No historian will do that.

Not denial but yes to some degree equivalence... India has seen hostility between religions, people being killed in its name, enemy civilians looted and killed etc. All of this has happened long before any Islamic or Christian invader set his foot in here...

 

[jaatram]

I am talking about the wars between the Afghan tribes.

What you are talking about is comfortable half truths. Why should Hindus allow a mosque on the ruins of ancient temples? Why should only we carry the burden of secularism?

 

[SarthakGanguly]

India has seen hostility between religions, people being killed in its name, enemy civilians looted and killed etc. All of this has happened long before any Islamic or Christian invader set his foot in here

There were NO organized religion itself before the coming of Islam and Christianity.

 

[jaatram]

Not denial but yes to some degree equivalence... India has seen hostility between religions, people being killed in its name, enemy civilians looted and killed etc. All of this has happened long before any Islamic or Christian invader set his foot in here...

None of those hostility resulted in demolition of temples on a large scale or burning of libraries at places of teaching.

 

[kaku1]

Yeah and trust me, I had no clue about it. It's something called historiography. Thanks to Joe saab here.

Take an example of Constantine the great,, he was biggest crook for Christians.

But for romans he was saving its nation.

I don't like Indian history too,, they are borings,, always lost the wars on a winning moment. its much better to watch india pak match.

 

[jaatram]

There were NO organized religion itself before the coming of Islam and Christianity.

Plus the soul harvesting.. the only reason Jews weren't persecuted here was they didn't seek any new converts.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

None of those hostility resulted in demolition of temples on a large scale or burning of libraries at places of teaching.

There is a huge difference. The Islamic invasion was for example the onset of what is called in history as 'Clash of Civilizations'. Nobody denies this.

Plus the soul harvesting.. the only reason Jews weren't persecuted here was they didn't seek any new converts.

Judaism by itself is a non-proselytizing faith.

 

[The_Showstopper]

None of those hostility resulted in demolition of temples on a large scale or burning of libraries at places of teaching.

Yes it did and has been discussed right here on PDF... Will post them when I get time..