Muslim and Hindu leaders who were loyalists of British Empire

[Multani]

You don`t know a lot of things my friend ... No need to put too much stress on your tiny brain ... things like "thinking" and "knowing" are not for Madrassah bred morons like you .. spam ??? ... There is something called "reliable source" ... but you wont understand ... British failed miserably ?? Who told you that ?? .... And it is not your religious obligation to reply to every post with stupid rants of yours ...... Ahmedis are as much Muslim as You are ..


And Here is something for cretins like you . Go and share your "information" with other cretins and leave this thread plz :




DEOBANDI/WAHABI ARE THE TRUE BRITISH AGENTS A BUNCH OF PROOFS

Deobandi/Wahabi Are the True British Agents - Bunch of Proof from their Own Books

Book Who is British Agent ? - Angraiz ka Agent Koun ? - Deobandi Wahabi British Agent - Deobandi Wahabi Angraiz ky Agent

Wahabi Deobandi Angraizon/British k Khair Khawa

ہمفرے کے اعترافات وہابی انگریز نواز

Article انگریز کے وفادار کون ... وہابی British Wafadar Koun?... Wahabi

Ashraf Ali Thanvi Deobandi ko Angraiz (British Government) ki Taraf sy Monthly 600 Rupees Milty Mukalma Tus Sadrain Scanned Proof

Deobandi/Wahabi Angraiz (British) Agent Proof from Their Own Books

Confessions Of A British Spy & British Enmity Against Islam (English Islamic Book)

British/Angraiz ky Agent Ala Hazrat NAHI balky DeoGandi/Deobandi Hein

Article Deobandi Angraiz/British Agent Forever (Proof from Pandat Ashraf Ali Thanvi's Book)

please no personal attacks

 

[INDIC]

Services provided

medal received.

Case closed.

Can't you understand the words Ambulance Service.

 

[scorpionx]

Nehru was a Hindu leader who was in the pocket of the wife of the British Viceroy , can you deny it ?!!

Dear member, please do not come up with gossips that school boys use to discuss in the intermediate hours between classes.She was not here to honey trap Nehru. Edwina Mountbatten was an unusually independent character. Unusually distinct and easily noticeable in the orthodox enclaves of British royal houses. She spent days and nights in the relief centers, meeting delegates from all over India, arranging for charity funds and foods,shelters for riot victims,riots that immediately broke out after the arrival of the Mountbattens. There is no denial of a relationship that was platonic in all sense but the way you have interpreted on the lines of Ian Flemming's scripts is not only ridiculous but inappropriate in a thread which demands academic interventions only.

And as for the remark 'good for him' by Nehru's sister , it obviously shows that this topic brings a sense of shame to her otherwise she would not have retorted as such.

"Nan" Pandit was Lady Mountbatten's first personal friend in India,friendship which grew stronger and stronger with passage of time. You believe she should have been more detailed than she was? How silly!!

 

[mujhaidind]

All popular leaders of both Pakistan and India were on the payroll of British.

British only wanted to divide Muslims and make India weaker. The wahhabi and 1857 revolts by Muslims made British piss their pants. So they decide to divide India cuz they had seen the power of united Muslims.

I am not posting names of Pakistani leaders who I think were on British payroll cuz you might get offended and ban me.

Indian leaders like Nehru, Gandhi, Savarkar, Tilak etc were on the payroll of UK and that's the reason british were soft on them.

 

[Indrani]

Dear member, please do not come up with gossips that school boys use to discuss in the intermediate hours between classes.She was not here to honey trap Nehru. Edwina Mountbatten was an unusually independent character. Unusually distinct and easily noticeable in the orthodox enclaves of British royal houses. She spent days and nights in the relief centers, meeting delegates from all over India, arranging for charity funds and foods,shelters for riot victims,riots that immediately broke out after the arrival of the Mountbattens. There is no denial of a relationship that was platonic in all sense but the way you have interpreted on the lines of Ian Flemming's scripts is not only ridiculous but inappropriate in a thread which demands academic interventions only.


"Nan" Pandit was Lady Mountbatten's first personal friend in India,friendship which grew stronger and stronger with passage of time. You believe she should have been more detailed than she was? How silly!!

I cannot believe that Edwina was not a honey trap for Nehru. How idealistic the Bengali world view is and how much of a fool they take the rest of Indians to be. Edwina Mountbatten was a very very promiscuous lady with far too numerous affairs to her name for her to even consider things like platonic relationship. This kind of a cock and bull story was only wrapped and sold to the simpleton Indians to cover up for Nehru's betrayal of India.

White worship and slavery is down to the bone in Bengali people.

How the wild promiscuity of Edwina Mountbatten - wife of Prince Charles' mentor - took a heartbreaking toll on her children | Mail Online

Pardon moi, I am neither lower middle class nor conservative in the traditional sense in the least.

 

[mujhaidind]

White worship and slavery is down to the bone in Bengali people.

Infact everyone on the Sub-continent.

Partition was a British ploy to weaken India. An Undivided India would easily challenge western supremacy. Unfortunately fools on both sides played into the hands of British.

I would Muslims lost the most due to partition.

 

[Indrani]

You are a silly fellow assuming that we share your "outrage". When Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit, Nehru' sister and the first woman to be President of the UN's general assembly was asked about the possible "affair", she replied with "good for him". It was Nehru's private business & had no bearing on his contribution to India.

Btw, I find it funny that you would think this is worthy of outrage but Jinnah betraying a friend by marrying his teenage daughter (who was 16 years old when Jinnah first brought up the topic of marriage) isn't.

Actually, we do share his outrage. Nehru is a much despised political figure in India as of today. That is India of the 21st century. In fact the whole family is considered to be nothing better than vermin feeding off the blood of poor Indians. That Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit found Jinnah to be promoter of Hindu-Muslim unity does not speak much about her intelligence.

If Nehru sent an indian navy ship to lay wreath on her grave, then it is even more of a shame for India that he was allowed to get away with use of state resources for his "platonic" love affairs.

Too much of platonic affairs also gave Nehru his syphilis.

Infact everyone on the Sub-continent.

Partition was a British ploy to weaken India. An Undivided India would easily challenge western supremacy. Unfortunately fools on both sides played into the hands of British.

I would Muslims lost the most due to partition.

You better not quote me. I am glad partition happened. I will be even more glad when India is a Hindu state. I do not care much for the Muslim desire to turn India into a caliphate or use it as a tool towards furthering Islam's goals.

 

[Joe Shearer]

All popular leaders of both Pakistan and India were on the payroll of British.

British only wanted to divide Muslims and make India weaker. The wahhabi and 1857 revolts by Muslims made British piss their pants. So they decide to divide India cuz they had seen the power of united Muslims.

I am not posting names of Pakistani leaders who I think were on British payroll cuz you might get offended and ban me.

Indian leaders like Nehru, Gandhi, Savarkar, Tilak etc were on the payroll of UK and that's the reason british were soft on them.

Perhaps you and @Indrani should ban others from your mutual admiration society.

 

[Indrani]

Perhaps you and @Indrani should ban others from your mutual admiration society.

Oh please did I rain misery on your suck-up parade? Unlike you, I do not belong to any clubs and associations of any mutual admiration society.

 

[mujhaidind]

I will be even more glad when India is a Hindu state. I do not care much for the Muslim desire to turn India into a caliphate or use it as a tool towards furthering Islam's goals.

Are you a girl? I had a Hindu gf. Why do you hate Muslims? Muslims were the ones who fought most fiercesly for Indian independence. Look up Wahabi and 1857 revolts. Why do you hinduvatis ignore that Christians and Anglo-Indians supported the Europeans. Why do you paint Christians as peace-loving and patriotic while Muslim as traitors. Why do you ignore Christian Missionary threat?

 

[INDIC]

@Azlan Haider by reading your comments I only get an impression that you are trying to portray those Muslims against partition of India as some kind of traitor to Muslims. Pakistan movement wasn't anything divine it was just a political movement, so its not good you go around abusing them if they stayed out of Pakistan movement. Anyway, partition was very suitable since Congress and Muslim League were agreed on almost nothing, most idiot was expecting Hindus to give up their political representation to appease Muslim League. It would had been a disaster for India, we would never going to get a constitution and independent India was going to face lot many hurdles in framing constitution and other key issues like feudalism, princely state/reorganization of provinces, power to centre, languages and many other things.

 

[wolfschanzze]

Are you a girl? I had a Hindu gf. Why do you hate Muslims? Muslims were the ones who fought most fiercesly for Indian independence. Look up Wahabi and 1857 revolts. Why do you hinduvatis ignore that Christians and Anglo-Indians supported the Europeans. Why do you paint Christians as peace-loving and patriotic while Muslim as traitors. Why do you ignore Christian Missionary threat?

@Aeronaut @Chak Bamu @Oscar @Manticore @jaibi please check this false flagger

 

[Indrani]

Are you a girl? I had a Hindu gf. Why do you hate Muslims? Muslims were the ones who fought most fiercesly for Indian independence. Look up Wahabi and 1857 revolts. Why do you hinduvatis ignore that Christians and Anglo-Indians supported the Europeans. Why do you paint Christians as peace-loving and patriotic while Muslim as traitors. Why do you ignore Christian Missionary threat?

I am. I do not hate Muslims. It is their ideology that I hate. No Muslims were not the most fierce fighters for Indian Independence. They fought for their Islamic empire. Later on they actually supported the British against Indian independence. Europeans have a 300 year old history of bringing misery to India. Muslims had triple the time to do so. Go to Hampi and see what the Muslims have done. Read the correct history of Tipu Sultan. That politically correct India does not talk of Muslim atrocities in the open does not mean Indians do not remember what the Muslims did.

No we Hindutvavadis do not ignore Christian Missionary threat.

@Aeronaut @Chak Bamu @Oscar @Manticore @jaibi please check this false flagger

Unfortunately, he is an Indian.

 

[wolfschanzze]

I am. I do not hate Muslims. It is their ideology that I hate. No Muslims were not the most fierce fighters for Indian Independence. They fought for their Islamic empire. Later on they actually supported the British against Indian independence. Europeans have a 300 year old history of bringing misery to India. Muslims had triple the time to do so. Go to Hampi and see what the Muslims have done. Read the correct history of Tipu Sultan. That politically correct India does not talk of Muslim atrocities in the open does not mean Indians do not remember what the Muslims did.

No we Hindutvavadis do not ignore Christian Missionary threat.



Unfortunately, he is an Indian.

Are you sure?Well Guess another Illegal Bangladeshi who will be shot and thrown into river.

 

[Indrani]

Are you sure?Well Guess another Illegal Bangladeshi who will be shot and thrown into river.

Yeah, I am sure. Have met these kind in person too.