RuheTag
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2012
- Messages
- 422
- Reaction score
- 0
I say again, he is not convicted of any crime, not even of abrogating the constitution. he is accused of it. The judge is saying his opinion out of the pile shyt of bias he has in his mind. Where was the trial of this judgement?
If this is how courts are to work, why we need lawyers and all the judicial apparatus? Just have some one of these moroons who can pass on their opinions as judgments and the sheeple will take it as law.
If tomorrow, a similar baboon says Imran khan has committed adultery and the proof is his illegitimate daughter, he should be stoned,,, No trial needed because 'he knows' it was done, Should I accept that?