What's new

Musharaf idealogy about Human Right

.
oh well actually I agree with Musharraf :agree:

Thats how it is supposed to be :smitten:

Sorry Yahya you perhaps created this video to criticize Musharraf where in my eyes he has given a very bold statement that must be admired by the Pakistanis. The whole world does not function the same way, different nations has different cultures, ideologies and way to deal with its peoples.

In West not even 10 people may posses illegal gun or arm in one city so the rule will be different.

Here in Pakistan I heard there are roughly about 12-13 million guns possessed by the peoples of Karachi only (both legal and illegal). Different way to handle both issues

My opinion only
 
Last edited:
. .
Ahaaaa! Great! So can we apply the same logic to kashmir and india?

Kashmiris' human rights serve India. India doesn't serve Kashmiris' human rights.

or

Western or Pakistani standards of human rights cannot apply to Kashmir.

P.S. I do not think so.
 
.
It is said "Laton ke bhoot baton se nahi maante"

In West, peoples are educated, very versed and mature enough to understand the critical issues.

In Pakistan, explain them... if they understand thats good.. otherwise you have to use "force" to make them understood :rofl:
 
.
It is said "Laton ke bhoot baton se nahi maante"

In West, peoples are educated, very versed and mature enough to understand the critical issues.

In Pakistan, explain them... if they understand thats good.. otherwise you have to use "force" to make them understood :rofl:

It is said "Laton ke bhoot baton se nahi maante"

In West, peoples are educated, very versed and mature enough to understand the critical issues.

In Kashmir, explain them... if they understand thats good.. otherwise you have to use "force" to make them understood :rofl:

:)
 
.
Ahaaaa! Great! So can we apply the same logic to kashmir and india?

Kashmiris' human rights serve India. India doesn't serve Kashmiris' human rights.

or

Western or Pakistani standards of human rights cannot apply to Kashmir.

P.S. I do not think so.
Kashmir = disputed territory. Pakistan. Not. India is the one without any rights to apply any standards on Kashmir.
 
.
Ahaaaa! Great! So can we apply the same logic to kashmir and india?

Kashmiris' human rights serve India. India doesn't serve Kashmiris' human rights.

or

Western or Pakistani standards of human rights cannot apply to Kashmir.

P.S. I do not think so.

again you are dragging Kashmir where it doesn't fit
Its not a Kashmir thread :angry:

and Kashmir is a disputed territory for both Pakistan and India... so different rules apply there... these rules are made for international borders only :D
 
.
Mushy at his best lol.this video is another feather in his cap like the statement he made to tape to Washington post regarding Mukhtaran Mai case that in pakistan women get gang raped in order to secure visa to western countries.
 
. .
Well he is just trying to justify his actions as the President, nothing else.

I somewhat agree to his point that when the nation is at risk, human rights come second. But again to determine situations that call for such an action is entirely upon the leadership and should also be in the general consensus of the society.
 
.
oh well actually I agree with Musharraf :agree:

Thats how it is supposed to be :smitten:

Sorry Yahya you perhaps created this video to criticize Musharraf where in my eyes he has given a very bold statement that must be admired by the Pakistanis. The whole world does not function the same way, different nations has different cultures, ideologies and way to deal with its peoples.

In West not even 10 people may posses illegal gun or arm in one city so the rule will be different.

Here in Pakistan there are roughly about 13 million guns possessed by the peoples of Karachi only (both legal and illegal). Different way to handle both issues

Basic Human Rights are same all over the world.
 
. .
Kashmir = disputed territory. Pakistan. Not. India is the one without any rights to apply any standards on Kashmir.

India does not consider Indian Kashmir as disputed so your argument does not hold good in this case.
 
.
Is this thread about Kashmir?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom