Bull
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2006
- Messages
- 6,850
- Reaction score
- 0
Mate, what happened in 1947 was the result of Hari Singh's unwillingness to provide just to the people and let them decide their fate. Lucky for Kashmir that is shares border with us otherwise it would have met same fate as Hyderabad Deccan or Goa.
There's still hope for the people of Kashmir and we intend to reach out to them till they get what they want.:
Thats where i have a problem, in a pricely state its the prince which decides what do with it. but then again you wont agree and i wont agree, so lets leave that and fodcus on mushraff ji.
Kargill was just a message to your armed forces and it was well understood. :
I dont believe it was just a message. What message? What kargil has done is helped IA push for modernisation and babus had to budge. Much tainted Bofors proved it worth. IA understood it lacked WLR, had to modernise artilerry, needed more precision guided munitions.
And moreover it was a failed attempt by PA to block the leh highway.
We don't believe in forceful solution, Kashmir insurgency is an old tactic which served well till 9/11 but we've moved on to diplomatic measures and come up with zillion new proposals, heck Musharraf even offered to demiliterise the zone. How long before you bow to international pressure to do so when WoT is over?
Time will tell...
Who is speaking about KAshmir. Which nation has put pressure or either parties for solving Kashmir? Nobody.