Contrarian
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2006
- Messages
- 11,571
- Reaction score
- 4
I do know that. The longest monorail route is the Osaka route IIRC.I'd agree with you if the alignment of the new monorail service were along a more densely populated route, but this is an excellent option for the city's eastern fringes based on its urban morphology. This system is more energy-efficient, much better at making tight turns, a lot more manoeuvrable than a standard/broad gauge metro coach, is devoid of overhead cables, and above all, is cheaper and quicker to build. Low to medium-density corridors in high density cities (like Osaka, Tokyo, KL) already have successful monorail systems supplementing mass transit systems. Some of the stations on the route are linked by walkway to their corresponding suburban railway stations, and to the citybus network (making it multi-modal).
I also know the advantages that monorail has.
But despite having a population density that is less than half of Bombay, Delhi is still building Metro over almost the entire city.
There is a reason for that.
Bombay should not have gone for monorail even if its cheaper, its just not enough to transport the mass of people who live there. Give it a couple of years and you will see this yourself when the Monorail will become as congested as the Local Trains. And then Metro wont be able to run on the same route as the Right of Way would have been occupied by the Monorail.