Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pakistan has nothing to Do With Non-state Extremists..pakistan Too Suffring frm them..let pakistan Handle those Non-state(indian backed) terrorist , Later InshaALLAH , WE WILL FIX INDIA.
If I have the License to call both the Oppositions fighting Over this Issue "FOOLS" then This Is What I am Addressing You all..... This is Published By a So called "reputed Washington-based research group" ..... Who are More interested In a War between the two Asian Neighbors, and The same Is happening In this forum.... War Of Words..... Congratz, We dont need a War for the Collapse of Asia, You people are more than Enough to destabilize the sub continent....
India is already working on'cold-start'. We are slowly but surely taking action to put things in place for that.
In case there is an attack and India decides to retaliate militarily, IA could launch a few shock attacks by brahmos missiles/commando units etc., quickly inflict casualties and declare ceasefire. This will never give Pakistan the excuse to go full-fledged/nuclear. Like I said, it's a calculated risk.
My friend, don't think that just because nations have nukes will wars be abolished.
!
And what do you think India would do in case of Mumbai 2?
Or rather lemme put it this way,
What do you think India would be forced to do in case of Mumbai 2?
Diplomatic Standoff Is the maximum Limit in todays World.... You Will Be Only a Fool to put Others Life In Risk for the sake of those who got killed , Diplomacy as always
Very fine. But unfortunately, in fits of anger, people tend to not see the obvious.
let me to refresh your mind.look what musharraf is saying that we trained terrorist and we handled them for 10 yrs and u r saying that pak has nothing to do with terror.
General Pervaiz Musharraf was no doubt Better than ZARDARI!
Firstly, I think we have better options than war. A little sabre rattling on Indus Waters Treaty won't harm India. We have better options than open full-fledged war.
Second, even if ,god forbid, there is a war, it will only be limited war and not full scale/nuclear.
Let me elaborate.
India is already working on'cold-start'. We are slowly but surely taking action to put things in place for that.
In case there is an attack and India decides to retaliate militarily, IA could launch a few shock attacks by brahmos missiles/commando units etc., quickly inflict casualties and declare ceasefire. This will never give Pakistan the excuse to go full-fledged/nuclear. Like I said, it's a calculated risk.
My friend, don't think that just because nations have nukes will wars be abolished.
It's human nature to fight wars. We have fought wars since the beginning of human civilization. Nuclear deterrent can work only up to acertain point beyond which, nations will be forced to take action to protect their interests. Don't count on nukes!
come on do u actually believe that u ppl would do a bit of hooky pooky and we would just sit like jack *** ur wrong and wrong and wrong a few shocks attack would result in a few very acute and may be chronic aftershocks may i need to remind you that india integrety is because of pakistan integrety because for now india has a what u call commen enemy and if pakistan is or deafeted (if that happens ) india would then be subjected to civil war
1 economy
2 moist
3Kashmir issue
Then answer me, what would you/GoP/PA do in case, God forbid, a mumbai like attack happens in pak and GoP finds conclusive evidence of Indian involvement?
Well people must understand one thing. In Indo-Pak scenario there is nothing called as Limited war or 'brokered peace or some bullcrap like that. There are just 2 things. War or Truce. So if people are so interested in limited war then that aint going to happen. If it is war then it is all out war.