Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Might not be released. Has happened beforeIt has already been recorded.
Might not be released..., say wha?Might not be released. Has happened before
The first sentence was neither neded nor a savoury way of addressing a colleague and a brother. I would suggest you amend it before someone else does it for you.Abey oye idiot. Difference is Americans, who have counted all our F16s inventory. Had that not been conducted than your post would had some value but posting this crap and that too while being a 'think tank' puts all the other thinktanks to shame.
Bvr kills wreakge fells at long distances and in India pak scenerio most likely to fell well within their own border. And both the countries, especially India, under Modi govt will give false information to their people. They have a recorded history of telling lies like from first so called surgical strike to Balakot attack and claiming about 300+ militants. So hiding the plane wreckage, which Pakistan cannot recover, is rather a simple job for them. As long as PAF is confident with their radar readings regarding the demise of Su30 from their BVR missile than if someone has to be trusted than it has to be PAF. Also the post Feb 27 engagement backs Pakistani claims big time where IAF rather decided to back off from any other potential clash that time despite of getting bombarded on 6 different locations and losing another plane in the form of Abhinandan. Clearly paf air superiority and dominance check mated iaf big time and this can only be achieved if they started to loose big ticket item like Su3 which, at that time completely demoralised them.
Look at your bold part. I'm merely pointing the irony of your logic. PAF and IAF both are offering patches and mere words to claim respective kills. The PATCH ? Unless realistic proofs are shared which proves SU-30 claim, then a patch is nothing but just a patch.
DG-ISPR and PAF credibility is at stake. DG ISPR already retracted his claims of two pilots. Which gave the rivals the ammo to launch a propaganda to claim second pilot was PAF pilot. So we should be extremely wary of making claims that we can't proof.
New Recruit
faheem sb.....The real man behind the Operation retort swift Air Marshal Haseeb Paracha
Seems now they have a section of the monument dedicated just for the Su-30MKi kill.If you are pedantic and a stickler to having proof then you have to accept there is none for the MKI shot down that PAF has demonstrated. So without proof how can you have CONFIRMED kill?