Mughal’s Rajput policy vs Afghan policy

[Chronos]

And you are butthurt dravidian who was put in place and now is running away

I am running away, from your lame comebacks bro.

I am being serious. I expected more. Seems you do what Punjabis do best. Be whiny little grls

 

[good_boy]

Who the hell is Saffron Soldier lmao.
Who brought up Rajputs? You changed the subject because I owned you on Sikh empire.

This thread is about rajputs and their ways of dealing with enemy, with giving away their daughters saffronsoldier

And you didn't own anything, sikh empire was indigenous to punjab.

I am running away, from your lame comebacks bro.

I am being serious. I expected more. Seems you do what Punjabis do best. Be whiny little grls

But you keep coming back again Don't ever say superior crap again otherwise you know whats awaiting you Now go and run around in jungle

 

[Chronos]

This thread is about rajputs and their ways of dealing with enemy, with giving away their daughters saffronsoldier

And you didn't own anything, sikh empire was indigenous to punjab.



But you keep coming back again Don't ever say superior crap again otherwise you know whats awaiting you Now go and run around in jungle

I am really sorry bro.

If I had realised that your intellect was this sub par and your comic delivery has the same capacity to clear out a building faster than a fire alarm I would have kept my mouth shut.

 

[good_boy]

I am really sorry bro.

If I had realised that your intellect was this sub par and your comic delivery has the same capacity to clear out a building faster than a fire alarm I would have kept my mouth shut.

Again

Let it go men damn your south indian pride was badly hurt

 

[A Town]

This thread is about rajputs and their ways of dealing with enemy, with giving away their daughters saffronsoldier

And you didn't own anything, sikh empire was indigenous to punjab.



But you keep coming back again Don't ever say superior crap again otherwise you know whats awaiting you Now go and run around in jungle

Okay Shan the poonjabi, at least we won't be getting mercilessly molested by Arabs.

 

[Foot12]

Elaborate further


Please explain how Pakistan has greater poverty then India

He is actually right. Throughout the history of South Asia modern Pakistan and particularly the Punjab was the
weakest part of South Asia as it was mostly under foreign rule. During ancient period parts of Afghanistan
and Pakistan was conquered by the Persian Achaemid Dynasty but the Persians never entered modern India.
The Greeks under Alexander also conquered modern Pakistan and Afghanistan but they did not enter India
because they feared the might of the Nanda Dynasty from Eastern India. The successors of Alexander
were defeated by Chandragupta of eastern India who liberated Pakistan from Greek rule. After that the Scythian invaders conquered Central Asia and invaded Pakistan and northwestern India. In India the Scythian invaders were at
first defeated by the south Indian Satavahana Dynasty which stopped the Scythian expansion and the Scythian
kingdom was later destroyed by the Gupta Empire which also liberated parts of Pakistan from Scythian rule.
In the 8th century the Arab invaders easily conquered modern Pakistan and tried to expand into India.
However the Arabs failed to conquer India because the Arabs were defeated by the south Indian Emperor
Vikramaditya II of the Chalukya Dynasty and Nagabhata of the Pratihara Dynasty.
The Sikh Dynasty was indeed the only indigenous Dynasty that ruled over the Punjab.

 

[priti]

This thread is about rajputs and their ways of dealing with enemy, with giving away their daughters saffronsoldier

do you realise that you are the descendant of those rajputs or whoever. so now you will give your daughters to the americans?

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Actually Afghans were/are notorious for disunity. When babur arrived , there was civil war going on between afghan, infact babur was invited to hindostan by a lodhi noble dualat khan lodhi.
Sher shah suri had to get rid of powerful lodhi and lohani afghans to assume power......in central india he slaughtered an entire afghan tribe, miana for unknown reason.
His son saleem shah suri exterminated every nine out of ten niazi tribesmen who contested to snatch deldhi throne from suris......

In their homeland pakhtunkhwa and afghanistan, they used to have continuous inter-tribal wars unless invaded by foreigners.

Babur was also aided by the Janjuas and silhadis etc... also read baburnama completely he didnt even had to fight for his first capital which before him was occupied by a cruel retarded relative of his... and what he did to the Pakhtuns is also known... No wonder Khushal Khan Khattak fought tht turd.

However according to a marathi booki Shivaji Maharj said that Aurangjeb's policy towards Rajputs was right.

Marathi kingdom Sawarajya founded by Shivaji raje had 1/3 Maharashtra under control.

His success inspired many people including Chharasaal Bundela.

Shivaji Raje, according to book Shreeman Yogi concluded that Aurangzeb realized the mistake of compromise with Rajput Hindu families and wanted that mistake to be righted.

Rajput Policy of Aurangzeb

Rajput policies of Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb were stern and he attempted to destroy the power of the Rajputs and annex their kingdoms.​

Share :

​

Rajput policies adopted by Aurangzeb were strict and stern. Aurangzeb reversed the policy which was enunciated by Akbarand pursued by Jahangir andShah Jahan. The Rajputs were the greatest obstacle in his pursuance of policy against the Hindus. Aurangzeb, therefore, attempted to destroy the power of the Rajputs and annex their kingdoms. There were three important Rajput rulers at that time, viz. Raja Jaswant Singh of Marwar, Rana Raj Singh of Mewar and Raja Jai Sing of Jaipur. All the three were at peace with the Mughals when Aurangzeb ascended the throne. But, Aurangzeb never kept faith in the loyalty of these Rajput rulers.

Aurangzeb deputed Raja Jai Singh in the Deccan where, ultimately he died in 1666 A.D. Raja Jaswant Singh was deputed to defend the north-western frontier of the empire. Two of his sons died fighting against the Afghan rebels and he himself died in Afghanistan in 1678 A.D. Aurangzeb was waiting for this opportunity. At that time, there was no successor to the throne of Marwar. He occupied Marwar immediately and, with a view to disgrace the ruling family, sold the throne of Jaswant Singh for rupees thirty-six lakhs. It seemed that the existence of Marwar was lost for ever. But, Marwar was saved. While returning from Afghanistan, the two wives of Rana Jaswant Singh gave birth to two sons at Lahore. One of them died but the other named Ajit Singh remained alive. Durga Das, the commander-in-chief of the Rathors came to Delhi with the prince and requested Aurangzeb to hand over Marwar to Maharaja Ajit Singh. Aurangzeb did not agree. Ajit Singh was declared the ruler of Marwar and the war of independence of Marwar began from that time.

Rana Raj Singh of Mewar, who realised that it was in the interest of Mewar to fight against the Mughals, gave support to Marwar. In 1681 A.D., Akbar, son of Aurangzeb revolted against his father with the support of the Rajputs. The revolt of Akbar failed and he fled toMaharashtra under the protection of Durga Das. Aurangzeb offered peace to Mewar and it was accepted. The Rathors of Marwar, however, continued their fight against the Mughals. Pursuing his son Akbar, Aurangzeb left for Deccan and could never come back from there. Marwar fought against the Mughals till the death of the emperor in 1707 A.D., of course, accepting peace in between twice, and finally succeeded in gaining its independence.

Thus, Aurangzeb failed to subdue either Mewar or Marwar. The only result of his policy against these states was that he lost the support of the Rajputs. The Rajputs, who were one of the best supporters of the Mughal Empire since the reign of Akbar, revolted against Aurangzeb. Their services could no more be utilised in strengthening the Mughal empire. On the contrary, it added to the troubles of the empire. It encouraged other revolts also. Thus, the Rajput policy of Aurangzeb failed and its failure contributed to the failure of Aurangzeb and resulted in the weakening of the Mughal Empire.

https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CCcQFjAA&url=http://www.indianetzone.com/47/rajput_policy_aurangzeb.htm&ei=RqoJU8KiBsjWrQfA8IGABA&usg=AFQjCNFKnTS9JNpOHlb-O3jc6Kqi1hV11g&bvm=bv.61725948,d.bmk

didnt read the whole article but werent the marthas fighting the rajputs aswell?

Beside ghuris, khiljis, lodhis and suris, pashtuns most recent example of rule over a rajasthan territory is of tonk state founded by yousafzais under amir khan.
Amir Khan (Nawab of Tonk) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Tonk (princely state) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It was a small state... and the "rule" over Rajhistan is also .... if you quote Hasan Khan.. than lemme tell you(could be wrong) he was a muslim rajput king who fought n died in panipat.

He is actually right. Throughout the history of South Asia modern Pakistan and particularly the Punjab was the
weakest part of South Asia as it was mostly under foreign rule. During ancient period parts of Afghanistan
and Pakistan was conquered by the Persian Achaemid Dynasty but the Persians never entered modern India.
The Greeks under Alexander also conquered modern Pakistan and Afghanistan but they did not enter India
because they feared the might of the Nanda Dynasty from Eastern India. The successors of Alexander
were defeated by Chandragupta of eastern India who liberated Pakistan from Greek rule. After that the Scythian invaders conquered Central Asia and invaded Pakistan and northwestern India. In India the Scythian invaders were at
first defeated by the south Indian Satavahana Dynasty which stopped the Scythian expansion and the Scythian
kingdom was later destroyed by the Gupta Empire which also liberated parts of Pakistan from Scythian rule.
In the 8th century the Arab invaders easily conquered modern Pakistan and tried to expand into India.
However the Arabs failed to conquer India because the Arabs were defeated by the south Indian Emperor
Vikramaditya II of the Chalukya Dynasty and Nagabhata of the Pratihara Dynasty.
The Sikh Dynasty was indeed the only indigenous Dynasty that ruled over the Punjab.

wow .. distorting history to suite your nonsense.. im impressed..

This thread is about rajputs and their ways of dealing with enemy, with giving away their daughters saffronsoldier

And you didn't own anything, sikh empire was indigenous to punjab.



But you keep coming back again Don't ever say superior crap again otherwise you know whats awaiting you Now go and run around in jungle

cant we discuss stuff while being civil sometimes?

 

[good_boy]

do you realise that you are the descendant of those rajputs or whoever. so now you will give your daughters to the americans?

decendents of rajouts good joke

 

[good_boy]

Okay Shan the poonjabi, at least we won't be getting mercilessly molested by Arabs.

Instead your kind bent over and let mughals f you whenever they wanted, warrior rajputs lol Mughal blood runs through your veins

 

[scorpionx]

@Oscar

Sir, can you close this thread please?

 

[IND151]

didnt read the whole article but werent the marthas fighting the rajputs aswell?

It happened much later, when Hindvi swarajya became empire, in time of Peshwas.

At the time of Shivaji there was no enmity between Rajputs and Marathas.

 

[Android]

Babur was also aided by the Janjuas and silhadis etc... also read baburnama completely he didnt even had to fight for his first capital which before him was occupied by a cruel retarded relative of his... and what he did to the Pakhtuns is also known... No wonder Khushal Khan Khattak fought tht turd.




didnt read the whole article but werent the marthas fighting the rajputs aswell?



It was a small state... and the "rule" over Rajhistan is also .... if you quote Hasan Khan.. than lemme tell you(could be wrong) he was a muslim rajput king who fought n died in panipat.



wow .. distorting history to suite your nonsense.. im impressed..



cant we discuss stuff while being civil sometimes?

It happened much later, when Hindvi swarajya became empire, in time of Peshwas.

At the time of Shivaji there was no enmity between Rajputs and Marathas.

Rajputs as allies of Mughals fought against Marathas from Shivaji's time. Although earlier it was only due to their alliance with mughals only after death of Aurangzeb with decline of Mughal influence amoung Rajputs and the rise of Maratha power in north India the real Maratha-Rajput enmity began.

 

[IND151]

Rajputs as allies of Mughals fought against Marathas from Shivaji's time. Although earlier it was only due to their alliance with mughals only after death of Aurangzeb with decline of Mughal influence amoung Rajputs and the rise of Maratha power in north India the real Maratha-Rajput enmity began.

Exactly, that's right.

 

[A Town]

Instead your kind bent over and let mughals f you whenever they wanted, warrior rajputs lol Mughal blood runs through your veins

I'm Tomar Rajput, our clan has no history of giving away our daughters. Instead we defeated Lodhi Pathans at Gwalior Fort. LOL