What's new

Most US opinion leaders back military defence of Taiwan if China invades, survey finds

Feng Leng

BANNED
Joined
Aug 3, 2017
Messages
4,355
Reaction score
-21
Country
China
Location
China

  • But intervention is opposed by the majority of the American public, though support has increased in recent years, according to think tank report
  • Most foreign policy leaders and professionals also believed the US was likely to make a major bid to counter China’s rise in the next two years

Most foreign policy leaders and professionals in the United States support the use of American troops to defend Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion, but it is opposed by the majority of the US public, a new survey has found.

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs said in a report published on Monday that most of the more than 900 surveyed opinion leaders – including executive branch officials, congressional staff, think tank scholars, academics, journalists and interest group representatives – favoured a US military defence of Taiwan in an invasion scenario.

But it found only 41 per cent of the public supported military intervention. Public support has grown significantly in recent years, however, up from 26 per cent in 2014.
In the survey of US opinion leaders – taken last August and September with the University of Texas at Austin – the defence of Taiwan was supported by 85 per cent of Republicans, 63 per cent of Democrats and 58 per cent of independents.

The findings are a barometer of the political consensus in Washington, which has hardened in recent years against China and in favour of US support for Taiwan, a self-ruled island that Beijing has vowed to bring under its control, by force if necessary. Beijing has stepped up its pressure campaign against Taiwan, including by poaching some of its few remaining diplomatic allies, blocking Taipei from joining multilateral institutions like
the World Health Organization, and with increasing military incursions into the island’s airspace.

US President Joe Biden’s administration has signalled it will make China central in its foreign policy, even as the approach will differ from his predecessor Donald Trump
in that he will work more with US allies to confront Beijing. The US State Department
urged Beijing to “cease its military, diplomatic and economic pressure against Taiwan”
days after Biden was inaugurated on January 20.

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs report said almost all of the opinion leaders surveyed believed the US was very likely to make a major effort to counter the rise of China in the next two years, including 97 per cent of Republicans and 91 per cent of Democrats.

While most said the effort would be bipartisan, 85 per cent of Republican foreign policy leaders believe that China’s development as a world power was a critical threat to the US, compared to 45 per cent of Democrats. Similarly, 88 per cent of Republican leaders said the US should “actively work to limit the growth of China’s power”, while 56 per cent of Democrat leaders said the US should “undertake friendly cooperation and engagement with China”.

The report noted that Republicans took a fairly hawkish view of China compared to Democrats, but that the inclination by Democrats for cooperation was not an open-ended one.

“The broad bipartisan support among opinion leaders for the American defence of Taiwan against Chinese invasion suggests that there are some red lines for opinion leaders when it comes to the US-China relationship,” it said. “Additionally, early statements from Biden administration officials suggest that opinion leaders’ expectations of a bipartisan American effort to counter the rise of China may well be met.”

Biden’s Secretary of State Antony Blinken told a Senate confirmation hearing that there was “no doubt” China posed the most significant challenge to the US, and said in a TV interview on Monday that the US needed to ensure that its military was postured “so that it can deter Chinese aggression”.

As relations between Beijing and Washington have reached their lowest point in decades – souring in particular in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic that was first reported in China – concerns among the US public about China have also risen. Tensions have soared between the major powers over trade, technology, competing global influence and interests, ideology and human rights issues in places like Hong Kong and
Xinjiang.

The report, which included public polling from more than 2,000 American adults conducted last July by the market research firm Ipsos, found that 55 per cent of the public saw the rise of China as a “critical threat” to the US.

As expected, a nuclear exchange is inevitable. The most likely scenario is an exchange of tactical nuclear weapons. A nuclear strike against US bases in Guam, Japan and South Korea is also likely. There is also a possibility of a limited strategic nuclear exchange such as wiping New York City and Washington DC off the map. There is non-negligible chance of total nuclear exchange targeting all major population centers and reducing US population to about 2,000,000.
 
.
taiwanjapan1.jpg


taiwanjapan2.jpg

https://focustaiwan.tw/politics/202101230014
 
.
Tell us how many Trump's 28 officials have found new job after being sanctioned?
 
.

  • But intervention is opposed by the majority of the American public, though support has increased in recent years, according to think tank report
  • Most foreign policy leaders and professionals also believed the US was likely to make a major bid to counter China’s rise in the next two years

Most foreign policy leaders and professionals in the United States support the use of American troops to defend Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion, but it is opposed by the majority of the US public, a new survey has found.

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs said in a report published on Monday that most of the more than 900 surveyed opinion leaders – including executive branch officials, congressional staff, think tank scholars, academics, journalists and interest group representatives – favoured a US military defence of Taiwan in an invasion scenario.

But it found only 41 per cent of the public supported military intervention. Public support has grown significantly in recent years, however, up from 26 per cent in 2014.
In the survey of US opinion leaders – taken last August and September with the University of Texas at Austin – the defence of Taiwan was supported by 85 per cent of Republicans, 63 per cent of Democrats and 58 per cent of independents.

The findings are a barometer of the political consensus in Washington, which has hardened in recent years against China and in favour of US support for Taiwan, a self-ruled island that Beijing has vowed to bring under its control, by force if necessary. Beijing has stepped up its pressure campaign against Taiwan, including by poaching some of its few remaining diplomatic allies, blocking Taipei from joining multilateral institutions like
the World Health Organization, and with increasing military incursions into the island’s airspace.

US President Joe Biden’s administration has signalled it will make China central in its foreign policy, even as the approach will differ from his predecessor Donald Trump
in that he will work more with US allies to confront Beijing. The US State Department
urged Beijing to “cease its military, diplomatic and economic pressure against Taiwan”
days after Biden was inaugurated on January 20.

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs report said almost all of the opinion leaders surveyed believed the US was very likely to make a major effort to counter the rise of China in the next two years, including 97 per cent of Republicans and 91 per cent of Democrats.

While most said the effort would be bipartisan, 85 per cent of Republican foreign policy leaders believe that China’s development as a world power was a critical threat to the US, compared to 45 per cent of Democrats. Similarly, 88 per cent of Republican leaders said the US should “actively work to limit the growth of China’s power”, while 56 per cent of Democrat leaders said the US should “undertake friendly cooperation and engagement with China”.

The report noted that Republicans took a fairly hawkish view of China compared to Democrats, but that the inclination by Democrats for cooperation was not an open-ended one.

“The broad bipartisan support among opinion leaders for the American defence of Taiwan against Chinese invasion suggests that there are some red lines for opinion leaders when it comes to the US-China relationship,” it said. “Additionally, early statements from Biden administration officials suggest that opinion leaders’ expectations of a bipartisan American effort to counter the rise of China may well be met.”

Biden’s Secretary of State Antony Blinken told a Senate confirmation hearing that there was “no doubt” China posed the most significant challenge to the US, and said in a TV interview on Monday that the US needed to ensure that its military was postured “so that it can deter Chinese aggression”.

As relations between Beijing and Washington have reached their lowest point in decades – souring in particular in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic that was first reported in China – concerns among the US public about China have also risen. Tensions have soared between the major powers over trade, technology, competing global influence and interests, ideology and human rights issues in places like Hong Kong and
Xinjiang.

The report, which included public polling from more than 2,000 American adults conducted last July by the market research firm Ipsos, found that 55 per cent of the public saw the rise of China as a “critical threat” to the US.

As expected, a nuclear exchange is inevitable. The most likely scenario is an exchange of tactical nuclear weapons. A nuclear strike against US bases in Guam, Japan and South Korea is also likely. There is also a possibility of a limited strategic nuclear exchange such as wiping New York City and Washington DC off the map. There is non-negligible chance of total nuclear exchange targeting all major population centers and reducing US population to about 2,000,000.
I seriously doubt american leader can take in the idea of suffer tactical nuclear exchange with China in exchange for Taiwan to be independent.

More like the US leader believe , US nuclear can knock China out while China nuclear weapons are hoax.. American new generation of leader are extremely poor in simple knowledge. They still believe they live in the era of American global domination.

If China manage to strike a US city with nuke and still having the abilities to strike back more. I believe american will immediately call for cease fire. They definitely wouldn't want to die for taiwanese. A people thousand miles away from them.
When is Japan going to recognised Taiwan independent and setup an embassy in Taipei? Action speaks louder than a few cheap word. :enjoy:

Maybe Japan recognised one China policy shows more meaning... :lol:
 
.
What are they gonna do that they haven't already done?

The only thing left is physical war which they can't win. Anything less than a decisive victory with near zero losses calls their entire system into question.
 
.
What are they gonna do that they haven't already done?

The only thing left is physical war which they can't win. Anything less than a decisive victory with near zero losses calls their entire system into question.
All they can do now is out with faked survey and report to delude themselves. When US don't even have balls to retaliate against Iran for missile strike and save Ukraine from Russia annex. They try convince us , american leader can afford nuclear exchange with China for Taiwan?

Are they trying to insult readers intelligent?
 
.
taiwan isn't worth a war with China that the u.s. is bound to loose...they are already in negative growth, war against a power like China isn't gonna give a jump start to the american industries, it is gonna scare the living shit out of all the american businessmen cuz they know they will never be able to match the industrial output of China and are thus, sure to loose the war.

don't forget that even though the american economy is war based, it is based on wars that it can actually win...war with China is gonna be a disaster for both the american economy AND the american military.

taiwan is just not worth it.
 
. .
This sort of report only serve the purpose of patting themselves on the back, USA is brave and strong, China be afraid. Chinese are just laughing. The outcome of the Korean War led the Americans not having the courage to invade the Northern part of Vietnam fearing another Chinese intervention. North Korea detonated its nukes and US remembers the lesson from the Korean War and didn't bother to stop it militarily. Iran blew up the American base and the US muscle man stood there frozen in fear. One day when China decides it is time to absorb Taiwan there's only one response available from the White House: "quack quack"

Everybody is betting the US is destined to lose the war, no brainer. Wallstreet and MIC runs America, the elite of these military companies want to justify the military spending and rob American tax payers' hard earned money while leaving infrastructure to crumble. Expect more of this sort of surveys to pop up from time to time.
 
.
Once China starts shooting at Taiwan, the US will go into silence mode until China completes it's invasion of Taiwan. Thereafter, the US will finally have the guts to condemn China.

That's what happened last year when China gave a beating to India in the Galwan Valley.

Before that, the US also went into silence mode when Russia invaded Crimea and also when it dismembered Georgia into three.
 
.
Once China starts shooting at Taiwan, the US will go into silence mode until China completes it's invasion of Taiwan. Thereafter, the US will finally have the guts to condemn China.

That's what happened last year when China gave a beating to India in the Galwan Valley.

Before that, the US also went into silence mode when Russia invaded Crimea and also when it dismembered Georgia into three.
and let's not forget when Azarbaijan beat the living snot out of armenia...even though the official u.s. position was supposedly against armenian occupation but we all know that there was a wink wink nod nod from washington to armenia.
 
.
I seriously doubt american leader can take in the idea of suffer tactical nuclear exchange with China in exchange for Taiwan to be independent.
There's not going to be a nuclear exchange. There's not even going to be a war. Let me tell you exactly how this is going to happen: China is going to keep building and strengthening its military until the day comes when it issues an ultimatum to Taiwan - reunify immediately or be annihilated. Taiwan will capitulate immediately and no one will be able to do anything about it.
When is Japan going to recognised Taiwan independent and setup an embassy in Taipei?
Why are you asking him? He's just a white weeb, you know the type.
 
.
This sort of report only serve the purpose of patting themselves on the back, USA is brave and strong, China be afraid. Chinese are just laughing. The outcome of the Korean War led the Americans not having the courage to invade the Northern part of Vietnam fearing another Chinese intervention. North Korea detonated its nukes and US remembers the lesson from the Korean War and didn't bother to stop it militarily. Iran blew up the American base and the US muscle man stood there frozen in fear. One day when China decides it is time to absorb Taiwan there's only one response available from the White House: "quack quack"

Everybody is betting the US is destined to lose the war, no brainer. Wallstreet and MIC runs America, the elite of these military companies want to justify the military spending and rob American tax payers' hard earned money while leaving infrastructure to crumble. Expect more of this sort of surveys to pop up from time to time.

When Iran blew up US base in Iraq through precision missile strike, the US regime first announced there were no casualties.

Then, in a week or so, dead US soldiers begun to pop up - few in Germany, few more in Afghanistan.

In two-three weeks, the poped-up dead US soldiers filled in the quote.

A major crisis averted.
I seriously doubt american leader can take in the idea of suffer tactical nuclear exchange with China in exchange for Taiwan to be independent.

More like the US leader believe , US nuclear can knock China out while China nuclear weapons are hoax.. American new generation of leader are extremely poor in simple knowledge. They still believe they live in the era of American global domination.

If China manage to strike a US city with nuke and still having the abilities to strike back more. I believe american will immediately call for cease fire. They definitely wouldn't want to die for taiwanese. A people thousand miles away from them.

When is Japan going to recognised Taiwan independent and setup an embassy in Taipei? Action speaks louder than a few cheap word. :enjoy:

Maybe Japan recognised one China policy shows more meaning... :lol:

The person is a fake Japanese. Very likely to be an !ndian.
 
.
More like the US leader believe , US nuclear can knock China out while China nuclear weapons are hoax.. American new generation of leader are extremely poor in simple knowledge. They still believe they live in the era of American global domination.

If China manage to strike a US city with nuke and still having the abilities to strike back more. I believe american will immediately call for cease fire. They definitely wouldn't want to die for taiwanese. A people thousand miles away from them.
Yes. That is absolutely correct. This is the scenario where it starts off as a tactical nuclear exchange and then escalates to a larger strategic strike against military targets in China. Since China does not have any many warheads to strike military targets it will reserve the warheads for population centers and will launch a JL-3 with multiple warheads to wipe out New York City. Then Americans surrender while declaring victory.
 
.
Once China starts shooting at Taiwan, the US will go into silence mode until China completes it's invasion of Taiwan. Thereafter, the US will finally have the guts to condemn China.

That's what happened last year when China gave a beating to India in the Galwan Valley.

Before that, the US also went into silence mode when Russia invaded Crimea and also when it dismembered Georgia into three.

Same thing when the Philippines 'won' in the cangaroo court (backed by mighty Australia as a little US canis). Then the US went into radio silence when China turned the award into cangaroo meat.
There's not going to be a nuclear exchange. There's not even going to be a war. Let me tell you exactly how this is going to happen: China is going to keep building and strengthening its military until the day comes when it issues an ultimatum to Taiwan - reunify immediately or be annihilated. Taiwan will capitulate immediately and no one will be able to do anything about it.

Why are you asking him? He's just a white weeb, you know the type.

Agree. I expect it to be more of an 'absorbsion' than annexing.

Technically, TW is already annexed (by history, by culture, by religion, by language, by ethnicity, by international law - the UN).

We already feel it here. Mainland is in every discourse. Even the few very radicals in the DPP feel how real it is.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom