What's new

Most Boston Residents Prefer Life Term Over Death Penalty in Marathon Case, Poll Shows

Azizam

BANNED
Joined
May 26, 2013
Messages
3,512
Reaction score
-8
Country
Sri Lanka
Location
United Kingdom
BOSTON — Despite this city’s immersion in a trial that is replaying the horrific details of the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, the vast majority of Bostonians say in a new poll that if Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the admitted bomber, is found guilty, he should be sent to prison for life and not condemned to death.

Given the choice of sentencing Mr. Tsarnaev to death or to prison for the rest of his life without the possibility of parole, 62 percent of Bostonvoters chose life in prison, while 27 percent said he should be put to death, according to a poll released Monday by WBUR, Boston’s NPR news station.

Previous polls have shown Bostonians opposing the death penalty for Mr. Tsarnaev. A Boston Globe survey conducted in September 2013, five months after the bombings, found that 57 percent favored life in prison while 33 percent wanted him put to death.


But the WBUR poll is the first to be conducted since Mr. Tsarnaev’s lawyers admitted this month that he had participated in the crimes. And it was conducted in the midst of his trial, which has included survivors recounting the graphic details of their limbs being blown off, and of loved ones being killed.

The poll clearly shows that Boston voters have nonetheless held firm on his potential punishment, underscoring the enduring depth of sentiment here against the death penalty.

Steve Koczela, president of the MassINC Polling Group, which conducted the survey for WBUR, said he initially expected support for the death penalty to intensify, given the grim testimony about the worst attack on American soil since Sept. 11, 2001.

But, he said, the poll’s results reflect the region’s fundamental liberalism and its longtime opposition to capital punishment.

“It seems voters stuck to their core values,” Mr. Koczela said.

New England was in the forefront of the movement to abolish capital punishment in the mid-1800s. Massachusetts did not do so until 1984. But the state has not carried out an execution since 1947. And the state legislature has withstood attempts to revive the death penalty, even in the immediate aftermath of the marathon bombings.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/24/u...icmst=1409232722000&bicmet=1419773522000&_r=0
 
. . .
Most of the voters are not related to the victim. So they do not care. Ask the victims relative or friends to vote will have a better view.
 
. .
Life term so they can drive him insane, more like.
Definitely not a "liberal infection".
Not really. The motive is to spare him from death penalty for the sake of his own well being.
 
. .
We don't have the death penalty in Massachusetts so we can't be hypocrites and make an exception.

There's been far worse people than him.
I am not familiar with justice system in the USA. So does it mean that Boston bomber would be spared from death penalty or is the responsibility of decision up for higher institution? And again, I think it's against morals to even think of providing such people with a comfortable life despite committing horrible crimes.
 
. .
I am not familiar with justice system in the USA. So does it mean that Boston bomber would be spared from death penalty or is the responsibility of decision up for higher institution? And again, I think it's against morals to even think of providing such people with a comfortable life despite committing horrible crimes.

Considering its a Federal case (ie a US Government terrorism charge) I don't think Massachusetts state laws actually have any sway on what happens to him.

Edit: I believe the jury (which is made up of Massachusetts residents) can do a thumbs up or down. So the article is saying Massachusetts is a state with no death penalty so the jurors are likely not to give him the death penalty.
 
Last edited:
.
Most of the voters are not related to the victim. So they do not care. Ask the victims relative or friends to vote will have a better view.

Spot on and basically sums it up.
 
.
We don't have the death penalty in Massachusetts so we can't be hypocrites and make an exception.

There's been far worse people than him.

Burnt Ziti Murder, 1995
This idiot killed one person while the terrorist killed many and they will killed in the name of religion. They are non repentant. And God who knows they may killed prison wardens or inmates if you put them in prison. They shall be terminated. Their mind are twisted.
 
.
This idiot killed one person while the terrorist killed many and they will killed in the name of religion. They are non repentant. And God who knows they may killed prison wardens or inmates if you put them in prison. They shall be terminated. Their mind are twisted.

LOL He's a scrawny small 19yr old and is going to get sent to ADX Florence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Where he'll be dealing with this....people with fists the size of his head
Screen Shot 2015-03-23 at 9.38.23 PM.png


 
Last edited:
.
.
You under estimate the power of twisted religion. Imagine these terrorist is brave enough to carry out sucide bombing which even disregard for their own life. What is going prison with thugs to them?

Getting beaten up daily and used as a sex toy for the rest of your life

He better get used to wearing a dress.
 
Last edited:
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom