What's new

Mossadegh's legacy; 'Persian nationalism amongst strongest forces on earth'

Surenas

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
6,740
Reaction score
-6
Mossadegh’s legacy: a sleeping lion called nationalism

Mohammad Mossadegh was Prime Minister of Iran for only two years in the early 1950s, but he has left a lasting mark on the country and the Middle East as a whole. Holly Dagres visited his ancestral village.

In the Giza governorate of Egypt the Mossadegh Street is of no significance to most, although its Iranian namesake has left a lasting imprint on Egypt’s political history. Without Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh’s influence, Gamal Abdel Nasser might not have nationalized the Suez Canal. But this story is not about Egypt, it is about the legacy of a man who changed the course of the Iran’s political future.

Many Iranians are seemingly convinced that Mossadegh was indeed a communist and rightfully overthrown to save the Pahlavi throne. According to New York Times journalist Stephen Kinzer’s highly readable book All the Shah's Men: An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror this is not the case. Rather, he portrays Mossadegh as an aristocrat who despised socialist and Marxist ideas. Kinzer views the coup as one of the leading causes of anti-Western sentiment in the Islamic Republic today as well as one of the main reasons behind the US Embassy takeover in 1979.

Mossadegh served as prime minister of Iran (1951-1953) under the Pahlavi dynasty and was Iran’s last strain of democracy; the country never has yet to see past the constitutional monarchy-turned-dictatorship. He firmly believed in the concepts of nation building and modernization, envisioning a free and democratic Iran. He sought to do this by ending the control of Iran’s oil reserves by the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC), owned by the British government, which refused Iran any significant share of the high profits from oil.

In 1951, with the unanimous support of the Iranian parliament, Prime Minister Mossadegh nationalized AIOC, now known as BP (British Petroleum). The nationalization created an international dispute, causing the British to sanction Iran economically and even threaten with war. Mossadegh travelled to the United Nations and made a plea to the Security Council for what he thought constitutionally belonged the Iranian people. This led to him gracing the cover of Time Magazine as ‘Man of the Year’.

The British sought a way to get back what they deemed was rightfully theirs. Realizing they could not do it alone, the UK’s MI6 intelligence agency conjured up a plan that would convince the Americans to get on board with his overthrow by labeling Mossadegh as a communist. This worked well as the ‘Red Scare’ was a dominating factor in US foreign policy at the time. Under the name Operation Ajax, the CIA with the help of MI6 carried out its first coup d’état. In December 1953, Mossadegh was tried in court and convicted of treason.

In his defense, he said: “Yes, my sin – my greater sin... and even my greatest sin is that I nationalized Iran's oil industry and discarded the system of political and economic exploitation by the world's greatest empire… This at the cost to myself, my family; and at the risk of losing my life, my honor and my property… With God's blessing and the will of the people, I fought this savage and dreadful system of international espionage and colonialism... I am well aware that my fate must serve as an example in the future throughout the Middle East in breaking the chains of slavery and servitude to colonial interests.”

Mossadegh spent some time in prison and was eventually sentenced to house arrest in Ahmad Abad, his ancestral village some 100 km from the capital Tehran. After about a decade, he passed away and was buried in his home on March 5, 1967.

Ahmad Abad is a quaint village and without proper directions from Tehran you can get lost – up until a point. From the outskirts of Tehran onwards, everyone is familiar with it. Stopping to ask for directions at a local Red Crescent office, one worker exclaimed, “Mossadegh’s Ahmad Abad?”

Given how subtle but intimidating the gate to his villa in Ahmad Abad is, it is certain what is hidden behind its doors still creates angst until this day. The turquoise green gate is deceiving, as there is no house number and only a doorbell. On my visit, I rang it a couple of times until a woman in chador appeared and opened it for us. It went without explanation why we were there.

Madar joon (‘Mother Dear’), is the daughter of Mossadegh’s cook and now the caretaker of his property. “We get 5-6 families on Thursdays and Fridays who come from all over the place to pay their respects,” she explained.

We walked the rocky pathway lined up by a garden of elm trees that led to a modest brick villa. “Why is it so difficult to locate his compound?” I inquired. “They do not want people to know he’s here to arouse nationalism again.”

She pointed to an empty plot of land against the wall, “That’s where the guards stayed while he was under house arrest.” I curiously asked if the Shah ever visited his nemesis -- not a chance.

The assumption was that years of confinement would be in a home with furniture, books, and so forth -- but was not the case. A door was opened and there lied his tomb in the middle of an off-white room adorned with photos of Mohammad Mossadegh. His grave was uplifted and covered with Iranian tapestry, two beautiful crystal lamps, and piles of prayer books. If you did not pay attention, you would think it was a makeshift table.

“People like to pray here, it’s a pilgrimage site for some,” Madar joon commented on the prayer books.

Mossadegh was never allowed a proper burial elsewhere; the Shah feared it could become a gathering point for the opposition. His body was buried without the traditional Muslim ceremony conducted for the dead. He requested that no gravestone be marked where he lay. The area we were standing in was once his dining room. As humble as the space appeared to be, the entry way and windows both shined light from the outside, giving it a holy aura and the feeling of a shrine.

My friend asked, “Did he leave this world content or resentful given what happened?” Mardar joon did not have an answer. What is clear though, is that Mossadegh left an impression on the world he lived in.

“By the passage of history, the visage and legacy of Mohammad Mossadegh has only gained in stature and significance. No wonder that monarchist revisionists altogether deny the coup and accuse Mossadegh of populism, while the Islamic republic, beginning with Ayatollah Khomeini himself has consistently downplayed or distorted the legacy of Mossadegh in the nationalization of Iranian oil, and exaggerated the role of the clergy, while new evidence are now surfacing implicating the clergy itself in the coup,” wrote Dr.Hamid Dabashiof Columbia University in an opinion piece on Al-Jazeera.

What Mossadegh did for Iran and the outcome he suffered as a result of it was a tragedy. However, the message of nationalism he carried was not about his loss of power, but the downfall of what he aspired for his homeland. Although Mossadegh has passed, his message lives ever so strongly. As journalist and analyst Robin Wright noted, “Persian nationalism is among the strongest forces in the world. If you know a Texan, add 5,000 years and you've got Persian nationalism.”

No matter how hard some attempt to tarnish the memory of Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh, nationalism thrives and will make itself known again when the time is right. To outsiders and regimes, old or new, nothing is more daunting than a sleeping lion.

Mossadegh’s legacy: a sleeping lion called nationalism - Your Middle East
 
. .
I thought Persian are only 51% of Iran population. Anyway, I would prefer a nationalist Iran over the current theocratic Iran.

Somewhere between 51% and 70% I would say. But 'Persian' here is only a synonym for 'Iranian'. It's like the Dutch who refer to Holland, rather than the Netherlands, although most people in the Netherlands don't live in the 'Holland' provinces.
 
.
Hey! the strongest force in the world from Dutch-land! the Dutch who refer to Holland, rather than the Netherlands is because near 100% of people live there is from Dutch race. I am sorry to tell this, but the opinion of using "Persian" instead of "Iranian" is not very popular, at least, at north-west of our beloved Iran.

As a member of a very little minority in Iran ;) I highly recommend you to not help the stupid movement of so called "Persian nationalism" but the cheap racist attitude which does nothing except insulting, unrealistic dreaming, and injection of false pride. This could only has the result of separation of motherland to Persian-land & Iran! And please be advise, by that time, minority may could not stop the false moving majority! With this clear result how one could name it as "nationalism"! It is anti-nationalism.

We could only have "Iranian nationalism" here. Long live Iran & long live every race who is loyal to this flag, no matter how percent of total is.

By the way let's to talk about Mossadegh, He is among the rare (may be only) nationalist Iranian politician. He is alive in heart of nation for ever.
 
.
Hey! the strongest force in the world from Dutch-land! the Dutch who refer to Holland, rather than the Netherlands is because near 100% of people live there is from Dutch race. I am sorry to tell this, but the opinion of using "Persian" instead of "Iranian" is not very popular, at least, at north-west of our beloved Iran.

As a member of a very little minority in Iran ;) I highly recommend you to not help the stupid movement of so called "Persian nationalism" but the cheap racist attitude which does nothing except insulting, unrealistic dreaming, and injection of false pride. This could only has the result of separation of motherland to Persian-land & Iran! And please be advise, by that time, minority may could not stop the false moving majority! With this clear result how one could name it as "nationalism"! It is anti-nationalism.

We could only have "Iranian nationalism" here. Long live Iran & long live every race who is loyal to this flag, no matter how percent of total is.

If the opinions of those people in the northwest of the country is a sort of aversion against anything that have to do with 'Persian', than those people are nothing but idiots. The two longest empires during the history of Iran were of Persian origin, and they have left by far the greatest legacy of Iranian culture. In fact, most other ethnic groups like the Medes and Elamites stood right behind the Persians in their adventure for creating the greatest and largest empire the world at that time had seen.

Persian is often nothing more than a synonym for 'Iranian' and if some ignorant fools have problem with the word 'Persian', than I recommend those fools to read some history books. By saying 'Persian' nobody is excluding other ethnic groups in Iran, nor it is some antagonism against other races. I don't know who told you that, but you have probably listen to much to those anti-Persian demagogues.

I'm proud of Persians, Azeri's, Kurds, Lurs, etc. But that doesn't mean that we don't have to acknowledge that the Persians will always have a special role in Iran's history. And I'm not even completely Persian myself.
 
.
The historical uncertain theories is not interesting for me, at all. I live at current and the human rights is more important for me than the rights of skeletons. By that historical date the whole population of Iran was less than a million, and the only clear fact is that the government was Persian. That not means all people live in this land were Persian.

The wisdom of ignorant fools like me never accept to decide about current 80 millions of Iranian at 2012 AC on the historical uncertain theories belong to 2000 BC from professors of Ducth-land.

I am sorry but I can not help any more if you can not accept there are Turkic people living here. It is not important to me how that happen, but there is a sole live fact that their mother tongue is Turkic Azerbaijani. And it is an internationally accepted right to allow people to learn and study in their mother tongue and still we do not have the right.

I am talking about mother tongue language right, You are talking about history of mother tongue language! Please do not repeat those historical rejected stories of how we turn to Turkic people, that not help any more! There is a problem of mother tongue language right and your historical theories never cure it. The problem of language is important for us but the loyalty to Iran is more important. We will achieve our democratic rights in total peace & unity of Iran.
 
.
The historical uncertain theories is not interesting for me, at all. I live at current and the human rights is more important for me than the rights of skeletons. By that historical date the whole population of Iran was less than a million, and the only clear fact is that the government was Persian. That not means all people live in this land were Persian.

Historical uncertainty? Man o man. Who's giving you guys education in the northwest of the country? You can talk about those skeletons or uncertain history, but it are those skeletons who have made you who you are today. Those skeletons have laid the foundation of Iran and it's culture. I never said that all people at that time were Persians. In contrast, you had many other ethnic groups, but they all stood side with side with the Persians and nobody was bragging about don't mention anything about 'Persians'.

The wisdom of ignorant fools like me never accept to decide about current 80 millions of Iranian at 2012 AC on the historical uncertain theories belong to 2000 BC from professors of Ducth-land.

Yeah, a real shame that a Dutch professor have to teach you guys about the history of the country you are living in.

I am sorry but I can not help any more if you can not accept there are Turkic people living here. It is not important to me how that happen, but there is a sole live fact that their mother tongue is Turkic Azerbaijani. And it is an internationally accepted right to allow people to learn and study in their mother tongue and still we do not have the right.

First of all, I don't believe that Azeri's are Turkic by ancestry. You can say it is, but I kindly refer you to what the greatest Azeri scholar Kasravi said. And I know you speak Turkic and I can respect that. I believe you guys should have the right to speak your own language, have your own tv-station and have access to Turkic language courses. If you think I oppose such thing, because I respect Iran's Persian history, you are wrong.

I am talking about mother tongue language right, You are talking about history of mother tongue language! Please do not repeat those historical rejected stories of how we turn to Turkic people, that not help any more! There is a problem of mother tongue language right and your historical theories never cure it. The problem of language is important for us but the loyalty to Iran is more important. We will achieve our democratic rights in total peace & unity of Iran.

Nobody said anything about your Turkic mother tongue. I just opened a thread about 'Persian' nationalism and you came completely disturbed in this topic and telling me that I shouldn't say anything about Persians.
 
. .
Dear, no body hate Persians. I only recommend to not use "Persian" instead of "Iranian" and I give my reasons. No one could find something insulting in whole my 343 posts, I have had in Pakistani forum regards to any race not only Persian race.

Thank you my professor, but I am not interested in history. Look at the map below.

800px-Sprachen_CH_2000_EN.svg.png


I am wondering what people study in History in Switzerland! The history of which race I mean. Dear friend nationality has nothing to do with races.

I never said "do not tell any thing about beloved & proud race of Persian", I just said we can not have a successful term of "Persian nationalism" in Iran. Any term that fails to provide equal coverage for all races in Iran could not be classified as "National".
 
.
I thought the thread was about Mohammed Mossadegh and not about Persian Nationalism. Mossadegh was a democratically elected Prime Minister of Iran and the CIA derailed his goverment and assassinated him. So much for the support of the USA for Democratic Institutions worldwide.
 
.
I thought the thread was about Mohammed Mossadegh and not about Persian Nationalism. Mossadegh was a democratically elected Prime Minister of Iran and the CIA derailed his goverment and assassinated him. So much for the support of the USA for Democratic Institutions worldwide.

My dear dear poster. Why are you spreading misinformation?

He was not "assassinated", instead he died at his home (while under house arrest).

Democratic election made him prime minister and not some kind of demi-God who could go around confiscating other people's property.

Democratic elections are supposed to bring up leadership that is honest, trustworthy, and much more importantly honors international treaties of its TIME. And in no circumstances uses some stone age rules to negate such treaties.

Many dimwit leaders in our region go through elections and somehow become so out of control that someone else from inside or outside the country has to come and get rid of them.

Just remember, elections are only the first step towards legitimate governance, not the last!

Musaddiq brought Mullahs and commies into his government and thus continued a long running power struggle with the Shah.

CIA may have helped but the hatred between Shah and Musaddiq was the key reason he was overthrown. I see that you are just going by typical Pakistani style gupshup and sunni sunnai batain (heresy).


peace
 
.
Musaddiq brought Mullahs and commies into his government and thus continued a long running power struggle with the Shah.

peace


Mossadegh was a nationalist and he paid the price for nationalizing the Iranian oil company which angered the British and the USA. Whether he was a communist or not is upto debate but even if he was a communist, he was still democratically elected by the Iranian people. Shah had no right to overthrow an elected Prime Minister at the behest of the British and the Americans.
 
.
The way my Iranian friends explained it to me, nationalist Iranians always call themselves Iranian, not Persian.

Persian is the foreign word for Iran. Foreigners confused a dominant ethnic group (Persians) to represent the whole of Iran, but the more inclusive term is Iranian.
 
. .
To me the former PM Mossadegh was not a nationalist.....he was a true patriot.

There are many countries that are much more nationalist than Iran (including ultra nationalism) but I don't think any country can match the patriotism of so many different ethnic groups living as proud Iranians. I don't even think USA can match it.

Patriots always see the reality when facts are present and truly care for their country and its future....nationalists follow a set guideline and have tunnel vision.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom