What's new

Moody's upgrades Pakistan's bond ratings to B3 with a stable outlook

SBD-3

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 19, 2008
Messages
15,120
Reaction score
-9
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Singapore, June 11, 2015 -- Moody's Investors Service has today upgraded Pakistan's foreign currency issuer and senior unsecured bond ratings to B3 from Caa1, and assigned a stable outlook.



Key drivers for the rating action are expectations of:



1. Continued strengthening of the external payments position; and

2. Sustained progress in structural reforms under the government's program with the IMF.



As progress on these fronts becomes firmly entrenched, risks of default are receding relative to other sovereigns in the Caa1-rated category that are facing heightened external vulnerabilities.



Concurrently, Moody's has upgraded the rating assigned to the US dollar Trust Certificates issued by The Second Pakistan International Sukuk Company Limited to B3.



In today's rating action, Moody's has also changed Pakistan's foreign-currency bond ceiling to B2 from B3, the foreign-currency deposit ceiling to Caa1 from Caa2, and the local-currency country risk ceiling to Ba3 from B1. The short-term country ceilings for foreign-currency bonds and deposits remain unchanged at Not-Prime (NP).



RATINGS RATIONALE



RATING UPGRADE TO B3 FROM Caa1



First Driver -- A strengthening external liquidity position



Pakistan's external liquidity position continues to strengthen. Net foreign reserves have climbed steadily, to $11.9 billion as of end-May 2015 from a low of $3.2 billion in January 2014.



Improvement in external liquidity has recently been bolstered by successful recent privatization offerings that have been met with strong investor appetite, in turn reinforced by Pakistan's underlying growth potential and progress on structural reforms. Moody's expects real GDP growth to rise to 4.7% year-on-year in the fiscal year ending June 2016, and further to a range of 5-6% in the following four years.



The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor with pledges worth $46 billion from Beijing, will also serve over time to accelerate growth by boosting investment in transportation links with China and addressing shortages in electrical power generation once implementation is underway.



Lower oil prices additionally relieve pressure on the current account of the balance of payments. However, a durable improvement in the external payments position will likely depend on sustained political stability and continuity in policy.



Second Driver - Implementation of reforms under the IMF program



Pakistan continues to make steady progress on structural reforms. In mid-May, the IMF issued a statement upon the conclusion of its staff mission, indicating that the seventh review under the Extended Fund Facility that it signed in March 2013 had been conducted successfully and would be reviewed by the IMF's management board.



Cumulative financial assistance under the IMF's 4.4 billion ($6.2 billion at current rates) special drawing rights program currently amount to $3.5 billion.



With the program now at its mid-point, we consider that the government has achieved significant traction in reforms . Continued commitment to the program would entail, amongst other goals, the government meeting deficit-reduction targets. Coupled with ongoing efforts to lengthen the maturity structure of Pakistan's debt, this would contribute to a decline in large gross financing needs.



RATIONALE FOR THE STABLE OUTLOOK



The stable outlook represents our expectation of balanced upside and downside risks.



Upward pressures stem from support from multilateral and bilateral lenders, which bolster an improving foreign reserve position and ongoing reform progress.



Despite positive ongoing developments, rating constraints which would put downward pressures stem from Pakistan's very low fiscal strength, due to its high debt levels and weak debt affordability in light of a narrow revenue base. Deeply entrenched weaknesses in the power sector also act as a bottleneck to growth. While Pakistan's government financing is mainly from domestic sources and system-wide external debt is declining as a percent to GDP, the level of external public debt poses a moderate degree of credit risk. In addition, political event risks remain relatively high in Pakistan despite recent stability.



RATIONALE FOR THE B3 RATING



Weak government finances, marked by elevated debt levels which will continue to exceed the median for B3-rated peers, are the primary constraint on Pakistan's B3 government bond rating.

Economic growth, while in line with other B-rated sovereigns, is below potential, largely due to supply constraints that stem from a lack of structural reforms in the energy sector.

The passage of ongoing reforms indicates that government effectiveness is improving. Nonetheless, a fractious political environment presents risks to smooth policy making. Moody's also sees an elevated vulnerability to geopolitical risks



WHAT COULD MOVE THE RATING UP/DOWN



Upward triggers to the rating would stem from sustained progress in structural reforms that would remove infrastructure impediments and supply-side bottlenecks. This would improve Pakistan's investment environment and eventually aid a shift to a higher growth trajectory. A fundamental strengthening in the external liquidity position and meaningful reduction in the deficit and debt burden would also be credit positive.



Conversely, we would view a stalling of the ongoing IMF program or the withdrawal of other multilateral and bilateral support, a deterioration in the external payments position or a more unstable political environment to be credit negative.



GDP per capita (PPP basis, US$): 4,736 (2014 Actual) (also known as Per Capita Income)

Real GDP growth (% change): 4.03% (2014 Actual) (also known as GDP Growth)

Inflation Rate (CPI, % change Jun/Jun): 8.2% (2014 Actual)

Gen. Gov. Financial Balance/GDP: -5.5% (2014 Actual) (also known as Fiscal Balance, excluding grants)

Current Account Balance/GDP: -1.3% (2014 Actual) (also known as External Balance)

External debt/GDP: 26.1% (2014 Actual, overall, including publicly guaranteed debt and )

Level of economic development: Very Low level of economic resilience

Default history: At least one default event (on bonds and/or loans) has been recorded since 1983.



On 09 June 2015, a rating committee was called to discuss the rating of the Pakistan, Government of. The main points raised during the discussion were: The issuer's economic fundamentals, including its economic strength, have materially increased. The issuer's governance and/or management, have materially increased. The issuer has become less susceptible to event risks.



The principal methodology used in these ratings was Sovereign Bond Ratings published in September 2013. Please see the Credit Policy page on Moody's - credit ratings, research, tools and analysis for the global capital markets for a copy of this methodology.



The weighting of all rating factors is described in the methodology used in this rating action, if applicable.



REGULATORY DISCLOSURES



For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on Moody's - credit ratings, research, tools and analysis for the global capital markets



For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.



The following information supplements Disclosure 10 ("Information Relating to Conflicts of Interest as required by Paragraph (a)(1)(ii)(J) of SEC Rule 17g-7") in the regulatory disclosures made at the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on Moody's - credit ratings, research, tools and analysis for the global capital markets for each credit rating:



Moody's was not paid for services other than determining a credit rating in the most recently ended fiscal year by the person(s) that paid Moody's to determine this credit rating.



Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review.

Please see Moody's - credit ratings, research, tools and analysis for the global capital markets for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.

Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on Moody's - credit ratings, research, tools and analysis for the global capital markets for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.

Anushka Shah
Analyst
Sovereign Risk Group
Moody's Investors Service Singapore Pte. Ltd.
50 Raffles Place #23-06
Singapore Land Tower
Singapore 48623
Singapore
JOURNALISTS: (852) 3758 -1350
SUBSCRIBERS: (852) 3551-3077

Anne Van Praagh
MD - Sovereign Risk
Sovereign Risk Group
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service Singapore Pte. Ltd.
50 Raffles Place #23-06
Singapore Land Tower
Singapore 48623
Singapore
JOURNALISTS: (852) 3758 -1350
SUBSCRIBERS: (852) 3551-3077
Moody's upgrades Pakistan's bond ratings to B3 with a stable outlook
 
. .
Last edited:
.
These corrupt American rating agencies analysis mean nothing! Right before the massive financial collapse of 2008 in America, these so-called rating agencies were rating completely junk financial securities as AAA. Ask @LeveragedBuyout for more inside info on these BS rating agencies:
Moody's Investors Service - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Justice Department Investigating Moody’s for Pre-Crisis Ratings - WSJ

I agree with you. But I'd rather that Pakistan be rated good with these idiots, than poor. Reason for that being, foreign investors take these ratings into consideration when assessing the risk potential of their investments.

In short a good rating means more FDI, if nothing else. A bad rating has us wallowing nowhere.
 
.
These corrupt American rating agencies analysis mean nothing! Right before the massive financial collapse of 2008 in America, these so-called rating agencies were rating completely junk financial securities as AAA. Ask @LeveragedBuyout for more inside info on these BS rating agencies:
Moody's Investors Service - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Justice Department Investigating Moody’s for Pre-Crisis Ratings - WSJ

In truth, the credit rating agencies (CRAs) are increasingly irrelevant. All institutional investors perform their own modeling to determine creditworthiness. Until recently, the main use of sovereign credit ratings was related to regulatory capital requirements, but even that role will be diminishing with time:

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/02f2506a-89fe-11e4-8daa-00144feabdc0.html

Banks’ scope to use credit rating agencies to assess the risks in their portfolios will be sharply reduced as global regulators push through new standards aimed at making lenders safer.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision said it wanted to reduce firms’ reliance on external ratings and compel banks to improve their own assessments of the risks of loans going bad when calculating capital requirements.
(...)
“The era of credit ratings being used in bank regulation could be slowly coming to an end globally. This is quite revolutionary,” said Gerald Podobnik, head of capital solutions at Deutsche Bank.
(...)
Banks in the US are already heavily restricted in their ability to rely on credit rating agencies, which were widely criticised for failing to spot risks brewing in the lead-up to the financial crash of 2007-09.

As early as 2010, the Financial Stability Board, a global standard-setter, said it did not want banks anywhere to “mechanistically” rely on ratings when assessing creditworthiness.

The Basel Committee said on Monday that it was considering replacing references to external ratings in the so-called standardised approach banks can use to measure risk-weighted assets.

For example, exposures to corporate customers would no longer be risk-weighted by reference to the borrower’s credit rating, but would instead be based on the firm’s revenue and indebtedness.


---

And on and on, but you get the idea. The free market works: the CRAs blew their credibility, so market participants are moving on to other mechanisms to measure credit risk. That said, it's hard to complain about a credit upgrade!
 
Last edited:
. .
Pakistan is probably going to go back to emerging market status next year, if things continue to improve.
 
.
In truth, the credit rating agencies (CRAs) are increasingly irrelevant. All institutional investors perform their own modeling to determine creditworthiness. Until recently, the main use of sovereign credit ratings was related to regulatory capital requirements, but even that role will be diminishing with time
Its called due diligence. However, most of the investment universe still use the credit rating as primary benchmark for determining creditworthiness.
 
. . .
Pakistan is probably going to go back to emerging market status next year, if things continue to improve.
It will, provided:

1. inflation is brought down from 8.2% to < 3%
2. The tax base is increased considerably.

(How much does multi-billionaire Nawaz pay in taxes? And there are thousands like him!)
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom