UserUnknown2025
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2018
- Messages
- 475
- Reaction score
- -7
- Country
- Location
The US invited China for a trade talk. Who do you think is getting softer?China is softening up. Chinese unable to win this trade war .
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The US invited China for a trade talk. Who do you think is getting softer?China is softening up. Chinese unable to win this trade war .
The u.s can tax on 500 billion of chinese goods while the chinese can only tax 150 billion of American goods. I'm ok with that
Hi, that is correct. Previously US invited China twice for talks but nothing came out of it. Is thrice a charm. Or will the boy cry wolf again?The US invited China for a trade talk. Who do you think is getting softer?
in 1978, when CN GDP merely 300usd/year, 1billion Cnese had to eat insect to survive cos they didnt havr money to buy burger,pizza; McDonal, Pizza hut GMC have been so rich already.Your economic knowledge is sucks, dude.
Yes, u.s can tax 500 billion, but China have antoher "Un-convventional" measure to make U.S hurt more.
Just look at how much U.S.A companies need Chinese market, much much more than Chinese company needs U.S market.
China Govt and people can easily Destroy Mcdonalds, A&W, Pizza Hut, Walmart, Apple, HP, GMC, Ford, Exxon Mobil business in the Largest Middle Class market in this World I'll be waiting for that, lol.
Jack Ma is just staving dump peasant before 1978. He could not even buy a cheap burger from Mc Donal and had to eat insect to survive, so how can he create 1 million in US ??Trade conflict backfiring on US workers as overseas investors start to look elsewhere
By Hu Weijia Source:Global Times Published: 2018/9/20
The founder of Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba, Jack Ma Yun, has abandoned a promise to create 1 million jobs in the US. His move is just the beginning of bigger-than-estimated job losses in the US triggered by the ongoing trade tensions between China and the US.
In a recent interview with the Xinhua News Agency, Ma said his initial commitment to create employment in the US was made on the premise of a friendly China-US partnership. That premise no longer exists, so "our promise cannot be fulfilled," Ma said.
The warning came several hours after the US suddenly escalated the trade dispute by announcing it would impose a 10 percent tariff on September 24 on $200 billion worth of Chinese goods.
The US economy added 213,000 jobs in June as the unemployment rate remained at a low level, but the escalating trade conflict may dim the long-term picture for US employment. Ma's comments reminded US economists that they may have underestimated the negative effect of the China-US trade conflict on the American job market.
During the past four decades, China has gone from being a low-wage supplier to a center of many global value chains. As the trade conflict intensifies, retaliatory tariffs imposed by China have made some US exports less competitive in the Chinese market, thus weakening the US' position in the global value chain. The matter may have a long-lasting negative impact on US exports and export-oriented jobs.
Further, China is witnessing a boom in outbound investment, but much of that money may go to other markets than the US, instead of being used to stimulate US jobs. Ma's comments have drawn lots of attention amid the escalating trade conflict, but Alibaba will not be the only Chinese enterprise to lose interest in US investment. Such decisions will have a direct influence on the US job market in the foreseeable future.
The trade conflict has already made the US lose the chance of adding 1 million jobs but it seems that's only the beginning. It's possible that the trade dispute will become an ongoing conflict with a long-term negative impact on the US economy.
http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1120436.shtml
How much? Not much considering the U.S have to give $400 billion of giving free cash to china every year just to appease ...McDonald. That's why the U.S won't give a fuking French about initiating this trade war while china has to go sue the U.S with the WTO. lolYour economic knowledge is sucks, dude.
Yes, u.s can tax 500 billion, but China have antoher "Un-convventional" measure to make U.S hurt more.
Just look at how much U.S.A companies need Chinese market, much much more than Chinese company needs U.S market.
China Govt and people can easily Destroy Mcdonalds, A&W, Pizza Hut, Walmart, Apple, HP, GMC, Ford, Exxon Mobil business in the Largest Middle Class market in this World I'll be waiting for that, lol.
China Cancels Trade Talks With U.S. Amid Escalation in Tariff Threats
Move comes after U.S. announces to tariffs on $200 billion of Chinese goods
By
Lingling Wei
Updated Sept. 22, 2018 12:08 a.m. ET
China scotched trade talks with the U.S. that were planned for the coming days, according to people briefed on the matter, further dimming prospects for resolving a trade battle between the world’s two largest economies.
The decision to pull out of the talks follows the latest escalation in trade tensions.
On Monday, President Trump announced new tariffs on $200 billion in Chinese imports, prompting Beijing to retaliate with levies on $60 billion in U.S. goods. Mr. Trump then vowed to further ratchet up pressure on China by kicking in tariffs on another $257 billion of Chinese products.
Chinese officials have said they wouldn’t bend to pressure tactics. By declining to participate in the talks, the people said, Beijing is following up on its pledge to avoid negotiating under threat.
“Nothing the U.S. has done has given any impression of sincerity and goodwill,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said at a news briefing Friday. “We hope that the U.S. side will take measures to correct its mistakes.”
The latest exchange of tariffs, which take effect this coming Monday, brings China and the U.S. closer to a full-blown trade war.
....
https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-...-amid-escalation-of-tariff-threats-1537581226
china should just wait and see. even with all these tariffs, amelika still import more from china. they basically just taxing their own people. lets just watch 'em fight each otherGood. US regime (playing by Trump's best selling book on deal making) was hoping to corner China, first throw a stick and then invite for negotiations.
By dismissing the invitation, China has left the US with its own stick beating the air. The US regime now has little information in regards to what China thinks and plans to do next.
So, the only way for the US regime is to simply continue the economic warfare.
It is epic to watch a country that has a smaller trade penetration to try to punish world's largest trading nation with the broadest global trade penetration.