What's new

Modi’s Middle East Deals Snub Iran

Yankee-stani

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 22, 2018
Messages
8,100
Reaction score
1
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is finally doing something about his country’s sluggish approach to the Middle East. Over the past five years, he has pushed an aggressive strategy of partnering with Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Israel in a bid to attract investments and forge deeper security partnerships. In doing so, he has largely ignored Iran and broken with India’s Cold War-era legacy in the region.

Since his election in 2014, Modi has made foreign policy a priority, prompting some observers to claim that a “Modi doctrine” is now in effect. The Middle East is no exception. Despite the complexity of governing a country the size of India and navigating its dizzying domestic politics, Modi has visited eight Middle Eastern countries and territories since 2014, more than his four predecessors combined.

Trending Articles
FP%20logo%202.png


And Now the Mueller Backlash Begins
With Trump somewhat vindicated by the special counsel, chances of impeachment are dimming.





Powered By
As so often is the case in the Middle East, the big driver is oil. India is likely to overtake China as the top driver of growth in oil demand by 2024. During his maiden trip to New Delhi in February, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman said that he saw over $100 billion worth of investment opportunities in India over the next two years, although details of these investments have yet to be revealed. India has also shored up its energy investments in the region. India’s state-owned oil company ONGC Videsh has acquireda 10 percent stake in an offshore oil concession in Abu Dhabi for $600 million.

The new interest comes against a background of historical indifference. Despite large volumes of trade and a massive presence of Indian expatriates in the Arab monarchies of the Gulf, cross-border investments between the Gulf monarchies and India have remained low for decades. Although 8 million Indians live in the Gulf states, remitting around $53 billion (as of 2015) back home each year, investments have remained negligible. India and the Gulf monarchies still do not appear among each other’s top 10 sources of foreign investments.

With Modi in office, however, things seem to be changing. Over the past four years, he has built close bonds with young Gulf leaders, including with the crown princes of Abu Dhabi and Saudi Arabia. Mohammed bin Salman reportedly referred to Modi during his visit to New Delhi as his “elder brother.”

As a result, investments from the Gulf in India’s energy sector have begun to materialize in recent years despite lower oil prices. In October 2018, Dubai’s DP World won a $78 million concession to develop a warehousing zone in India’s largest container port, in Mumbai. Moreover, Saudi Aramco and the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company have agreed to invest over $44 billion in India’s massive Ratnagiri oil refinery in Maharashtra, although the project has faced delays. In May 2018, the Saudi petrochemicals giant Saudi Basic Industries Corp. was also reported to be considering a 50 percent stake in a $4.6 billion petrochemicals plant in the Indian state of Gujarat, Modi’s home constituency.

For Modi, however, the Middle East is not just about business deals and investments, as security also ranks high on the agenda. India has eyed Israel as a source of sophisticated military technology, topping the list its defense clients at over 40 percent of Israeli military exports between 2012 and 2016. Recent Indian acquisitions include 54 attack drones, the Barak-8 maritime long-range surface-to-air missile system worth over $6 billion in total, and a medium-range surface-to-air missile system for $2 billion.

India is also showing signs of finally overcoming its reluctance to forge security partnerships with the Gulf states whose security apparatuses had long been closely associated with Pakistan

India is also showing signs of finally overcoming its reluctance to forge security partnerships with the Gulf states whose security apparatuses had long been closely associated with Pakistan. Such efforts seem to be paying off. In 2018, the UAE extradited three individuals wanted in India on corruption charges, a move that the Indian ambassador in Abu Dhabi attributed to a “personal touch,” an obvious if implicit reference to Modi’s warm ties with leaders in the UAE. In 2018, India signed a pact with Oman that allows the Indian Navy to use the strategic port of Duqm overlooking the Arabian Sea and the Indian Ocean.


Security cooperation was also a key focus of Mohammed bin Salman’s visit to New Delhi last month, when the two sides agreed to cooperate in producing “spare parts for naval and land systems.” In a statement, Saudi Arabia promised to share more intelligence to boost counterterrorism cooperation with India, a powerful message considering the India-Pakistan confrontation over a militant attack last month that left 40 Indian paramilitary troops dead in Kashmir. And the UAE is reported to have played an important role in defusing these tensions.

But there’s one big exception to Modi’s love fest with the Gulf: Iran. Although India’s relations with the Islamic Republic may not have worsened, they pale by comparison with the thrust of its ties to Israel or the Gulf monarchies in recent years. As a result, India seems to be breaking with its “balancing” approach to the region, often considered a legacy of its Cold War-era policy of nonalignment.

Two factors explain Modi’s dampened enthusiasm for close ties with Iran. The first is the reinstatement of U.S. sanctions against Iran by President Donald Trump in November 2018. Although India’s External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj reacted to the decision by saying that India did not recognize “any country-specific sanctions,” the threat of secondary sanctions is likely to dissuade most Indian firms from casting their lot with Iran.

READ MORE


Modi’s Bullet Train Dreams Are Hitting Rural Roadblocks

With elections coming soon, land rights are getting in the way of an easy political win.

DISPATCH | VAISHNAVI CHANDRASHEKHAR

India is Trump’s Next Target in the Trade War

Ending India’s preferential trade treatment won’t hurt economically—but it is politically dangerous.

ARGUMENT | ARVIND PANAGARIYA

Everyone Wants a Piece of Afghanistan

A U.S. withdrawal has opened the door to a possible political settlement, but success will depend on regional powers and the country’s neighbors.

ARGUMENT | BARNETT R. RUBIN
Second, Iran, like India, has a tough negotiating style, and the project to develop Iran’s Farzad B gas field is a case in point, as difficult negotiations between Iran and an Indian consortium have dragged on since at least 2009.

But ignoring Iran carries risks of its own. The country’s massive fossil fuel reserves have consistently placed it as one of India’s top suppliers of oil and gas. Recognizing Iran’s strategic location, India has also invested in the Chabahar port complex, which it hopes to use to access Central Asian markets and Afghanistan without going through Pakistan. By alienating Iran, however, India risks losing its foothold in Chabahar or gas concession in Farzad B to Chinese or Russian competition.

At present, Modi seems willing to accept these risks. He has replaced India’s cautious “balancing” approach to the region with an aggressive strategy geared toward attracting investments from the Gulf and deepening India’s security partnership with Israel, ignoring Iran in the process. Even a new government in New Delhi if Modi falls in the upcoming elections will find it difficult to change this trajectory, as the premier’s imprint is likely to be longer-lasting than many expected when he came to office.


Harsh V. Pant is the head of the strategic studies program at the Observer Research Foundation in New Delhi and a professor of international relations at King’s College London.

Hasan Alhasan is a Ph.D. candidate at King’s College London

VIEW
COMMENTS

TAGS: ARGUMENT, INDIA, IRAN, MIDDLE EAST, NARENDRA MODI, SAUDI ARABIA, UAE
 
. .
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is finally doing something about his country’s sluggish approach to the Middle East. Over the past five years, he has pushed an aggressive strategy of partnering with Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Israel in a bid to attract investments and forge deeper security partnerships. In doing so, he has largely ignored Iran and broken with India’s Cold War-era legacy in the region.

Since his election in 2014, Modi has made foreign policy a priority, prompting some observers to claim that a “Modi doctrine” is now in effect. The Middle East is no exception. Despite the complexity of governing a country the size of India and navigating its dizzying domestic politics, Modi has visited eight Middle Eastern countries and territories since 2014, more than his four predecessors combined.

Trending Articles
FP%20logo%202.png


And Now the Mueller Backlash Begins
With Trump somewhat vindicated by the special counsel, chances of impeachment are dimming.





Powered By
As so often is the case in the Middle East, the big driver is oil. India is likely to overtake China as the top driver of growth in oil demand by 2024. During his maiden trip to New Delhi in February, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman said that he saw over $100 billion worth of investment opportunities in India over the next two years, although details of these investments have yet to be revealed. India has also shored up its energy investments in the region. India’s state-owned oil company ONGC Videsh has acquireda 10 percent stake in an offshore oil concession in Abu Dhabi for $600 million.

The new interest comes against a background of historical indifference. Despite large volumes of trade and a massive presence of Indian expatriates in the Arab monarchies of the Gulf, cross-border investments between the Gulf monarchies and India have remained low for decades. Although 8 million Indians live in the Gulf states, remitting around $53 billion (as of 2015) back home each year, investments have remained negligible. India and the Gulf monarchies still do not appear among each other’s top 10 sources of foreign investments.

With Modi in office, however, things seem to be changing. Over the past four years, he has built close bonds with young Gulf leaders, including with the crown princes of Abu Dhabi and Saudi Arabia. Mohammed bin Salman reportedly referred to Modi during his visit to New Delhi as his “elder brother.”

As a result, investments from the Gulf in India’s energy sector have begun to materialize in recent years despite lower oil prices. In October 2018, Dubai’s DP World won a $78 million concession to develop a warehousing zone in India’s largest container port, in Mumbai. Moreover, Saudi Aramco and the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company have agreed to invest over $44 billion in India’s massive Ratnagiri oil refinery in Maharashtra, although the project has faced delays. In May 2018, the Saudi petrochemicals giant Saudi Basic Industries Corp. was also reported to be considering a 50 percent stake in a $4.6 billion petrochemicals plant in the Indian state of Gujarat, Modi’s home constituency.

For Modi, however, the Middle East is not just about business deals and investments, as security also ranks high on the agenda. India has eyed Israel as a source of sophisticated military technology, topping the list its defense clients at over 40 percent of Israeli military exports between 2012 and 2016. Recent Indian acquisitions include 54 attack drones, the Barak-8 maritime long-range surface-to-air missile system worth over $6 billion in total, and a medium-range surface-to-air missile system for $2 billion.

India is also showing signs of finally overcoming its reluctance to forge security partnerships with the Gulf states whose security apparatuses had long been closely associated with Pakistan

India is also showing signs of finally overcoming its reluctance to forge security partnerships with the Gulf states whose security apparatuses had long been closely associated with Pakistan. Such efforts seem to be paying off. In 2018, the UAE extradited three individuals wanted in India on corruption charges, a move that the Indian ambassador in Abu Dhabi attributed to a “personal touch,” an obvious if implicit reference to Modi’s warm ties with leaders in the UAE. In 2018, India signed a pact with Oman that allows the Indian Navy to use the strategic port of Duqm overlooking the Arabian Sea and the Indian Ocean.


Security cooperation was also a key focus of Mohammed bin Salman’s visit to New Delhi last month, when the two sides agreed to cooperate in producing “spare parts for naval and land systems.” In a statement, Saudi Arabia promised to share more intelligence to boost counterterrorism cooperation with India, a powerful message considering the India-Pakistan confrontation over a militant attack last month that left 40 Indian paramilitary troops dead in Kashmir. And the UAE is reported to have played an important role in defusing these tensions.

But there’s one big exception to Modi’s love fest with the Gulf: Iran. Although India’s relations with the Islamic Republic may not have worsened, they pale by comparison with the thrust of its ties to Israel or the Gulf monarchies in recent years. As a result, India seems to be breaking with its “balancing” approach to the region, often considered a legacy of its Cold War-era policy of nonalignment.

Two factors explain Modi’s dampened enthusiasm for close ties with Iran. The first is the reinstatement of U.S. sanctions against Iran by President Donald Trump in November 2018. Although India’s External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj reacted to the decision by saying that India did not recognize “any country-specific sanctions,” the threat of secondary sanctions is likely to dissuade most Indian firms from casting their lot with Iran.

READ MORE


Modi’s Bullet Train Dreams Are Hitting Rural Roadblocks

With elections coming soon, land rights are getting in the way of an easy political win.

DISPATCH | VAISHNAVI CHANDRASHEKHAR

India is Trump’s Next Target in the Trade War

Ending India’s preferential trade treatment won’t hurt economically—but it is politically dangerous.

ARGUMENT | ARVIND PANAGARIYA

Everyone Wants a Piece of Afghanistan

A U.S. withdrawal has opened the door to a possible political settlement, but success will depend on regional powers and the country’s neighbors.

ARGUMENT | BARNETT R. RUBIN
Second, Iran, like India, has a tough negotiating style, and the project to develop Iran’s Farzad B gas field is a case in point, as difficult negotiations between Iran and an Indian consortium have dragged on since at least 2009.

But ignoring Iran carries risks of its own. The country’s massive fossil fuel reserves have consistently placed it as one of India’s top suppliers of oil and gas. Recognizing Iran’s strategic location, India has also invested in the Chabahar port complex, which it hopes to use to access Central Asian markets and Afghanistan without going through Pakistan. By alienating Iran, however, India risks losing its foothold in Chabahar or gas concession in Farzad B to Chinese or Russian competition.

At present, Modi seems willing to accept these risks. He has replaced India’s cautious “balancing” approach to the region with an aggressive strategy geared toward attracting investments from the Gulf and deepening India’s security partnership with Israel, ignoring Iran in the process. Even a new government in New Delhi if Modi falls in the upcoming elections will find it difficult to change this trajectory, as the premier’s imprint is likely to be longer-lasting than many expected when he came to office.


Harsh V. Pant is the head of the strategic studies program at the Observer Research Foundation in New Delhi and a professor of international relations at King’s College London.

Hasan Alhasan is a Ph.D. candidate at King’s College London

VIEW
COMMENTS

TAGS: ARGUMENT, INDIA, IRAN, MIDDLE EAST, NARENDRA MODI, SAUDI ARABIA, UAE
The pseudo countries of the Persian gulf are running out of the oil. Saudi oil at the current production will run out in 10 years and they will become a net importer of the oil (they may even have to go back and live in tents soon after)..iran on the other hand has the world's largest oil and gas reserves in the world (99 YEARe oil and ALMOST unlimited natural gas) and 80 million highly educated population. So for a country like india it will be foolish to put all their eggs in the Arab basket.
 
. .
India has forced itself into corner due to terrible timing of Chahbahar and failing to stop Taliban takeover of Afghanistan.

KSA in turn has moved closer to Pakistan. Iran also should normalize with Pakistan in the coming months.
 
.
What will Iran's move be?
Iran's move is to have a balanced relationship with both India and Pakistan (The day Chahbahar port was being Inaugurated, Iran invited the Pakistan ambassador to the event to send the signal that Iran's relationship with India is not at the expense of Pakistan).Indians do not have to pay ransom to the Arabs to have relationship with them..look at the size and potentials of India. They look at Arabs as just another market around them and that is how Chinese look at these Arabs. Pakistan in the other hand is pressed for Arab cash and has more difficult time balancing her relationships when it comes to Iran (being a neighbour) vs Arabs (holding the money bag!!)..All this is short time.. The Arab money will disappear soon so would their influence on the region. They go back being camel jokey they always have been. Pakistan, India and Iran will prosper and China is a big player for this to happen.
 
.
Iran's move is to have a balanced relationship with both India and Pakistan (The day Chahbahar port was being Inaugurated, Iran invited the Pakistan ambassador to the event to send the signal that Iran's relationship with India is not at the expense of Pakistan).Indians do not have to pay ransom to the Arabs to have relationship with them..look at the size and potentials of India. They look at Arabs as just another market around them and that is how Chinese look at these Arabs. Pakistan in the other hand is pressed for Arab cash and has more difficult time balancing her relationships when it comes to Iran (being a neighbour) vs Arabs (holding the money bag!!)..All this is short time.. The Arab money will disappear soon so would their influence on the region. They go back being camel jokey they always have been. Pakistan, India and Iran will prosper and China is a big player for this to happen.

The bigger problem (I would think) is India warming up with Israel. They are getting all sorts of technology from that relationship. With the US and Israel recently getting 2 new bases in Oman they are doing a good job of circling Iran. The venom they spit is becoming more potent with threats like using navy to ensure Iran can't export oil.
 
.
The pseudo countries of the Persian gulf are running out of the oil. Saudi oil at the current production will run out in 10 years and they will become a net importer of the oil (they may even have to go back and live in tents soon after)..iran on the other hand has the world's largest oil and gas reserves in the world (99 YEARe oil and ALMOST unlimited natural gas) and 80 million highly educated population. So for a country like india it will be foolish to put all their eggs in the Arab basket.
We would like to have trade relations with as many countries as possible.
We don't fight for others.
 
.
The bigger problem (I would think) is India warming up with Israel. They are getting all sorts of technology from that relationship. With the US and Israel recently getting 2 new bases in Oman they are doing a good job of circling Iran. The venom they spit is becoming more potent with threats like using navy to ensure Iran can't export oil.
for iran military planners the more US bases simply means the more targets they have at their easy reach..as for Israel and their capabilities they are bunch of cowards who ride expensive toys and hide behind their big dady...India simply using Israel to get favour with Americans..nothing wrong with that..they need the US investment to turn around their economy. I can not blame them for that game the same way Pakistan is courting the Arabs for their benefit nothing wrong with that either...and iran is happy just as long as these two powers do not become hostile to iran..
 
.
The pseudo countries of the Persian gulf are running out of the oil. Saudi oil at the current production will run out in 10 years and they will become a net importer of the oil (they may even have to go back and live in tents soon after)..iran on the other hand has the world's largest oil and gas reserves in the world (99 YEARe oil and ALMOST unlimited natural gas) and 80 million highly educated population. So for a country like india it will be foolish to put all their eggs in the Arab basket.
That's a lie. It's more closer to 70 years but whatever.
 
.
The pseudo countries of the Persian gulf are running out of the oil. Saudi oil at the current production will run out in 10 years and they will become a net importer of the oil (they may even have to go back and live in tents soon after)..iran on the other hand has the world's largest oil and gas reserves in the world (99 YEARe oil and ALMOST unlimited natural gas) and 80 million highly educated population. So for a country like india it will be foolish to put all their eggs in the Arab basket.
India is in no way putting all its eggs in the gulf. India learned why overly relying of one country or region is a bad idea since for most of its independent history, India mostly focused its diplomacy on the Soviet Union. Now, India arguably has some of the best diplomacy in the world considering it has good relations with coutries of competing interests such as US and Russia, Iran and Israel, etc. Modi even won the Grand Collar of the State of Palestine. And no, nobody is saying Iran's relations with India should come at the expense of Pakistan. India has no problem with Pakistan participating in the development of Chabahar or the INSTC. It is Pakistan that accuses Iran of conspiring with India to sponsor terrorism in Balochistan. Pakistan is also annoyed that Iran's civil government(not the ayatollah) has mostly stayed out of the Kashmir dispute.

Anyway, circumnavigating US sanctions is a problem for India considering India also wants to increase ties to the US. I think the best solution here is to make some kind of deal where india stops buying Venezeulan oil in favor of Iran and recognizes Guaido as Venezeula's president. I have heard something like that is going to happen.

India has forced itself into corner due to terrible timing of Chahbahar and failing to stop Taliban takeover of Afghanistan.

KSA in turn has moved closer to Pakistan. Iran also should normalize with Pakistan in the coming months.
Lol India is anything but cornered. Chabahar port has been a huge success and *** the INSTC come closer to completion, India's influence in Central Asia has increased . India's trade with Russia and the CARs have also seen notable increases since Chabahar became operational. in addition to Chabahar, India has increased its influence and trade with SE Asia due to the India-Myanmar Thailand road and other projects, and most recently India is now becoming a major player in Africa as seen by Humanitarian and Anti-Piracy operations in Africa and military exercises with 17 African nations.

Meanwhile, Pakistan has become exposed and isolated internationally as a sponsor of terrorism. The UNSC including China passed a resolution directly condemning JeM for conducting the Pulwama attack, and the international community now supports India's fight against terrorism more strongly then ever.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom