Kompromat
ADMINISTRATOR
- Joined
- May 3, 2009
- Messages
- 40,366
- Reaction score
- 416
- Country
- Location
How should Pakistan calculate Modi's 'Mad Dog Posture' ?
As we're at it, he's trying to fan jingoism among his electorate during polls. Bashing Pakistan with 'trigger diplomacy' has worked historically well. Just start a flame war accusing Pakistan of imaginary border violations and supporting Kashmiris...the next thing you'll know is that those who can't even have a palmful of boiled rice and thin dal too would pick up their unwashed dhotis and get high on jingoism.
That is all understood. He is a mass murderer who's comfy with a bloodbath, he is an Islamophobic demagogue and a product of Hindutva ideology which seeks a mythical kingdom he plans to rule while riding a cow.
On the other hand are his real world limitations. He runs the only country in the world geographically locked between two nuclear armed enemies which are allied to each other. A weakening economy, a limit on the use of conventional military force and an almost complete string of pearls.
The question is...if Modi's policy towards Pakistan is going to earn him any more cookies than jingoistic hoo ha and populist votes?
If he commits aggression against Pakistan, either covertly or overtly...what should be our response to restrain him?
What does this mean for China and its interests in Pakistan and the region?
Thoughts?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What is Mad Dog Posture?
''Mad Dog Posture'' Is a political theory which entails a policy of ''Violent Unilateralism'' adopted by a certain political regime to satisfy the domestic vote bank by engaging pre emptively against an assumed low teir threat. Demagogues like Bush, Blair, Hitler, Stalin, Saddam have used it in the past, mainly for political gains at home.
Hypothesis in this thread is to judge if Modis Mad Dog posture presents a credible security threat to Pakistan (Like Poland, Kuwait, Iraq etc) or its just a temporary farce to be scrapped at a later date.
As we're at it, he's trying to fan jingoism among his electorate during polls. Bashing Pakistan with 'trigger diplomacy' has worked historically well. Just start a flame war accusing Pakistan of imaginary border violations and supporting Kashmiris...the next thing you'll know is that those who can't even have a palmful of boiled rice and thin dal too would pick up their unwashed dhotis and get high on jingoism.
That is all understood. He is a mass murderer who's comfy with a bloodbath, he is an Islamophobic demagogue and a product of Hindutva ideology which seeks a mythical kingdom he plans to rule while riding a cow.
On the other hand are his real world limitations. He runs the only country in the world geographically locked between two nuclear armed enemies which are allied to each other. A weakening economy, a limit on the use of conventional military force and an almost complete string of pearls.
The question is...if Modi's policy towards Pakistan is going to earn him any more cookies than jingoistic hoo ha and populist votes?
If he commits aggression against Pakistan, either covertly or overtly...what should be our response to restrain him?
What does this mean for China and its interests in Pakistan and the region?
Thoughts?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What is Mad Dog Posture?
''Mad Dog Posture'' Is a political theory which entails a policy of ''Violent Unilateralism'' adopted by a certain political regime to satisfy the domestic vote bank by engaging pre emptively against an assumed low teir threat. Demagogues like Bush, Blair, Hitler, Stalin, Saddam have used it in the past, mainly for political gains at home.
Hypothesis in this thread is to judge if Modis Mad Dog posture presents a credible security threat to Pakistan (Like Poland, Kuwait, Iraq etc) or its just a temporary farce to be scrapped at a later date.
Last edited: