Peshwa
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2009
- Messages
- 4,918
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
I was discussing with @Aeronaut the "worst case scenario", as made evident by my very first post in this thread, which referenced nuclear weapons.
His point was valid in this context, an armed population is very much a deterrent to any potential invading force, look at Switzerland during WW2.
This entire argument was always based on hypothetical situations. In which case it is always necessary to look at the worst possible scenario.
Lets get one thing clear...There is ZERO advantage for India in occupying a country like Pakistan...especially when at their core on a people to people basis...they hate us at varying degrees....
The best outcome of war advantageous to India would be to get strategically located areas of Kashmir back and sign some beneficial pacts that help our trade routes...other than that we have zero stake in Pak..FACT!
Oh and maybe make a bali ka bakra out of his highness Mr. Hafiz Saeed...LOL!!
And worst case scenario....what makes one think the US and China will allow an ally to just fall flat?