What's new

Modi pushes 'obsolete' Tejas on reluctant military

Tejas is for quantity Rafael is for quality
Not to mistake above statement with LCA capabilites though. It is as capable as jf 17 if not more. Big difference is we can field 2 LCA's or even 3 LCA's for each jf you put in sky. That is big capability in itself.

You will indeed need to. !!!
 
. .

Its a forced, no option statement from the military

Read the sum total of all the information and articles released about the LCA

The years of delay after delay

The begging by your own military for alternative planes

In the end your own government forcing your military to accept the plane

Whats your military supposed to say, come out and declare the LCA as obsolete junk with major issues or put a brave face on it


The only people who dont get it is indian fanboys
 
.
I think Indians are trying to build the worlds most diverse airforce. Only buying 36 planes.
 
.
What are the LCA's real specs. It is heavier than intended so some spec shortfalls resulting from that.

LCA in any form should be India's priority, they should start inducting and introduce changes mid production and via back upgrades as it becomes more mature, its primary objective is to replace InAFs aging aircraft and it is better to them in current form. Revising and waiting for a more advanced version will only compounds problems because by the time the newer version comes out InAF might have pointed out further improvements.

Exactly.. It's as simple as that. Get it out for some real testing and stuff. Then build upon it. That's how it is for any tech product. It's not going to develop on it's on sitting on the shelves and via simulations.
 
.
Wasay indians ko to aag he lag gae hay apna banaya hoa jet urana para hay to:coffee:

Atleast IAF guys will not give vote to modi next time for forcing them to fly another flying coffin
 
.
Its a forced, no option statement from the military

Read the sum total of all the information and articles released about the LCA

The years of delay after delay
The years of delay after delay

The begging by your own military for alternative planes


The begging by your own military for alternative planes

In the end your own government forcing your military to accept the plane

Whats your military supposed to say, come out and declare the LCA as obsolete junk with major issues or put a brave face on it
And you Being A Completely Outsider That to a Pakistani Know What Indian Air force Chief Has Stated in his Statements
Completely Hilarious @MilSpec Listen to this Guy

The years of delay after delay

The begging by your own military for alternative planes
Still Better option than 60 era Russian Migs IAF Currently operating
 
.
A totally absurd spin on the news that the IAF will be receiving 120+ LCAs at a minimum.


If the LCA is obsolete then so is the Thunder and the Gripen.

Wasay indians ko to aag he lag gae hay apna banaya hoa jet urana para hay to:coffee:

Atleast IAF guys will not give vote to modi next time for forcing them to fly another flying coffin
A "flying coffin" that has never crashed- funny stuff.


It's funny how much scrutiny and criticism the LCA gets on this site but none of the same benchmarks are applies to your super fighter the JF-17 who isn't as capable as the LCA is today despite being in service for years and that too at an abysmal production rate.

What's the matter, big brother China won't allow dissent? Or you're aware the JF-17 is the backbone of your airforce so you can't afford to actually start picking apart its (many) shortcomings?
 
.
Why u want to buy LCA when IAF saying it is obsolete :angry:. No more Tejas :sniper:
 
.
A totally absurd spin on the news that the IAF will be receiving 120+ LCAs at a minimum.


If the LCA is obsolete then so is the Thunder and the Gripen.


A "flying coffin" that has never crashed- funny stuff.


It's funny how much scrutiny and criticism the LCA gets on this site but none of the same benchmarks are applies to your super fighter the JF-17 who isn't as capable as the LCA is today despite being in service for years and that too at an abysmal production rate.

What's the matter, big brother China won't allow dissent? Or you're aware the JF-17 is the backbone of your airforce so you can't afford to actually start picking apart its (many) shortcomings?

How can you compare LCA to Grippen or Thunder

Both the JF17s and Grippen are flying have their issues worked out and are looking to the future

LCA is a paperweight has had delay after delay and if you glean the info from various sources has weight, range, safety and other issues


Is it our fault that your own military dosent want the plane and has to be forced
 
.
A totally absurd spin on the news that the IAF will be receiving 120+ LCAs at a minimum.


If the LCA is obsolete then so is the Thunder and the Gripen.


A "flying coffin" that has never crashed- funny stuff.


It's funny how much scrutiny and criticism the LCA gets on this site but none of the same benchmarks are applies to your super fighter the JF-17 who isn't as capable as the LCA is today despite being in service for years and that too at an abysmal production rate.

What's the matter, big brother China won't allow dissent? Or you're aware the JF-17 is the backbone of your airforce so you can't afford to actually start picking apart its (many) shortcomings?

Bird in hand is better than two in the bush :) let's wait till we have couple of squadrons.
 
.
tejas is in a process to transform itself into a scarry multirole platform with 30*+ AOA, 1000 KG weight slash, Aerodynamic improvement, Best in class EW suit, AESA and dedliest missile like Paython, Durby, R 77, Astra MK 1 And 2. There is nothing in our neighborhood to match it.

How can you compare LCA to Grippen or Thunder

Tejas in its current avatar is a match to gripen c and exceed Gripen c with MK1+. LCA mk2 shall atleast match Gripen D. Thunder is nowhere in picture.
 
.
How can you compare LCA to Grippen or Thunder

Both the JF17s and Grippen are flying have their issues worked out and are looking to the future

LCA is a paperweight has had delay after delay and if you glean the info from various sources has weight, range, safety and other issues


Is it our fault that your own military dosent want the plane and has to be forced
Enough of your shit ,you want me to troll down here .Trust me am really good with that mate.What do you think about Jf 17 ? even after 8 years of production ,you came up with mere 50 jets that not even close to 7 plane per year even after assembling of parts .
 
.
tejas is in a process to transform itself into a scarry multirole platform with 30*+ AOA, 1000 KG weight slash, Aerodynamic improvement, Best in class EW suit, AESA and dedliest missile like Paython, Durby, R 77, Astra MK 1 And 2. There is nothing in our neighborhood to match it.



Tejas in its current avatar is a match to gripen c and exceed Gripen c with MK1+. LCA mk2 shall atleast match Gripen D. Thunder is nowhere in picture.

Oh yeah, how many do you have, how many are flying, how many squadrons do you have flying

What about the alluded to weight, range and safety issues

Why does you government have to force a reluctant military to accept such a super dooper plane

What does your military know about this plane that it isnt willing to induct it accept under duress
 
.
Good... India is 2nd largest country..it should produce its own jets even if they are not as much potent as western counterparts like China does..
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom