What's new

Modi goaded Pakistan in deliberate yet risky move

Lol, tough approch is totally working, just his statement has sent whole of Pakistan in defensive mode. They have ended up proving themselves that nothing is happening in Balochistan. His one sentence has caused rallies in Balochistan. Pakistani population has gone into frenzy mode. You can see the evidence on this form itself where a new thread is being created on the same issue in every couple of hours just to assert "all is well". I think a couple of sentences can make a whole nation defensive and in frenzy its tough engouh

Now coming to your rant for rest of the world, they did gave statements, got back to their home and the business is as usual with Indians, no one cares for Pakistan. Because Pakistan has nothing to offer credible to rest of the world apart from n suspicion and suicidal tendencies viz a viz nukes

What defensive mode? No major international player or body has endorsed Modi's statement. India wanted to divert attention from Kashmir to Pakistani cross border terrorism, but the entire world community is watching what is happening in Kashmir. The BJP government thought they could tire the protesters off and use unrestrained violence against them, but your leaders have had to make concessions and take a softer approach. So no, I don't think Modi is succeeding in anything against Pakistan, his words only appeal to the ultranationalists in India, but do not change the situation on the ground, and there is no endorsement from anyone.
 
Last edited:
.
What defensive mode? No major international player or body has endorsed Modi's statement. India wanted to divert attention from Kashmir to Pakistani cross border terrorism, but the entire world community is watching what is happening in Kashmir. The BJP government thought they could tire the protesters off and use unrestrained violence against them, but your leaders have had to make concessions and take a softer approach. So no, I don't think Modi is succeeding in anything against Pakistan, his words only appeal to the ultranationalists in India, but do not change the situation on the ground, and there is no endorsement from anyone.
and doing what..nada, no? The whole international community has been watching atrocities in Balochistan and for that matter every nook and corner of the world...International community will watch and do nothing unless it suits their agenda....In 2008 almost double the number of people lost their lives...what did international community do..once again nada..no?? What Pakistani's don't understand is that every single attempt to corner India is not working....International community is not giving two hoots about it...so apart from causing lot of issues to the people whom they call their brethren Pakistan is not achieving anything...let me know if you think that is not the case...

Also what kind of concessions have been made here? Last i heard even the J&K chief minster(who by the way is softer on fringe elements) was also justifying force....please help me with concessions that you are referring to..

Now let me add some thoughts of mine....

Contrary to what everyone was thinking Modi did lot of moves to improve relations with Pakistan...The kind of restraint that was shown in Pathankot attack is unprecedented...This is all Modi written over it but alas friends on other side seems to be looking the other way...What you are now seeing is also unprecedented....Leaders here have always refrained from bring Balochistan but Modi is different...I believe he has made up his mind to test these waters as well....will it work in our favor or against us only time will tell...though a choice has been made....all i can say is watch out Pakistan...
 
Last edited:
.
What defensive mode? No major international player or body has endorsed Modi's statement. India wanted to divert attention from Kashmir to Pakistani cross border terrorism, but the entire world community is watching what is happening in Kashmir. The BJP government thought they could tire the protesters off and use unrestrained violence against them, but your leaders have had to make concessions and take a softer approach. So no, I don't think Modi is succeeding in anything against Pakistan, his words only appeal to the ultranationalists in India, but do not change the situation on the ground, and there is no endorsement from anyone.
Let me know when someone does anything about it apart from lip service.

Just a few statements had made your country to go on rallies on streets. Writers into a frenzy mode. By bringing in Balochistan India has ensured that world knows that there is one more issue called Balochistan. Till now no one, not even in India knew about it till the government of India took stance for it.

The idea is simple you poke us in Kashmir we will double poke you in Balochistan. We do have a history of achieving objectives if we start to poke.

Regarding Kashmir, try it once again, we have deployed BSF this time which is way more ruthless than the CRPF. Any such adventures by Pakistan backed protestestors to throw stones at armed forces will be dealt with the more agression this time. Lets see what Pakistan can do about it. Cry a river in front of international community. People will listen to you provide you condolence messages, then they will go home and enjoy the Indian pie.
 
.
Offcourse you guys are obsessed with Pakistan. Who started this shit? Answer: Your chai wala terrorist PM. Now when your mass murderer Pm started it, we will make sure to finish it for better. :buba_phone:
waiting .. ! just dont lose another half of Pakistan while trying to teach us lessons !
 
.
Baluchistan is a existing state mate while Khalistan is a fake identity based term which claims East & West Punjab? Do you really belive Nawaz Shariff will accept Lahore as capital of Khalistan? I don't think so.


India has not converted Baluchistan in proxy war as it doesn't exist as per the Pakistani government. We don't claim Baluchistan as well. We can only hope & pray for the human rights if Balochi people, can we not.


HAHA. I think you failed to understand my intial comment.. You see Modi mentioning the Balochistan freedom moment is the equivalent of NS to mentioning the Khalistan freedom moment........... We can only hope and pray for human rights of the supressed people of India, such as Dalits, Kashmiris, and Punjabis.
 
.
What is there which whole world doesn't know. Is wishing good for native people of Baluchistan is bad for Pakistan? Rather it's a good thing that a Indian prime minister is putting his weight behind the Balochi people to get their rights to live with honor and dignity. Don't you thing it's acceptable within statement made from Red Fort.
No not at all!
In fact, thank you for caring so much for OUR people. Only if you had care the same about Kashmir the situation would not have gotten this far. Anyway, this is NOT the problem. The problem or what you say "bad" the desperate attempt to portray that Balochs are in some sorts of misery and it is only India who is concerned. This is probably because it is ONLY INDIA that "knows" it so that is why!
 
.
If na
Now this topic is becoming boring.
If Pakistani pm NAwaz sharif mentions the khalistan movement,nagaland Manipur Hyderabad or gujrat issues then it will be hardcore lol
Indians will shout and cry like goswami as they always do
Bombay stack Bombay,bombay ,Bombay lol and on other side we are facing terrorism shit backed by india
 
.
:closed:

Imagine the outlash of indians, if Nawaz sharif mentioned Khalistan at a major address...


have guts, tell him to try that in upcoming UNGA...!!! ha ha ha

If na

If Pakistani pm NAwaz sharif mentions the khalistan movement,nagaland Manipur Hyderabad or gujrat issues then it will be hardcore lol
Indians will shout and cry like goswami as they always do
Bombay stack Bombay,bombay ,Bombay lol and on other side we are facing terrorism shit backed by india

have guts prove it in International Courts or at-least convince your higher thn sky, deeper thn ocean friend china... a country produce terrorist for the globe and crying abt bloch bloch and bloch, raw, raw, and rawwwwwwwwwwww
 
.
probably the hundreth post in last few days iterating again about this... What?? Are you Pakistanis that much scared of Modi?

PS New low for PDF where vituperative, acerbic and abusive comments are rated in positive.... and replies are being countered by negative ratings.... Too much quality damage of PDF !!!
 
.
The funny thing is, when Pakistan calls for a third party intermediary, India says Kashmir is a bilateral issue between India and Pakistan.

Now it's saying it's not a bilateral issue, that they won't talk to Pakistan on Kashmir. The international community knows India is acting like an occupation force in Kashmir, and wants India to talk to Pakistan.

In response to the international community reaction, modi brought up AJK and Baluchistan. No major international player endorsed his position, and there was criticism from within india for modi's statement. People realize Baluchistan is an internal matter for Pakistan.

The separatists want India to Pakistan, the kashmiri people want it, the international community wants the dialogue as well. But India is just getting embroiled in more and more curfews, not realizing that there is no military solution to this conflict.
 
.
HAHA. I think you failed to understand my intial comment.. You see Modi mentioning the Balochistan freedom moment is the equivalent of NS to mentioning the Khalistan freedom moment........... We can only hope and pray for human rights of the supressed people of India, such as Dalits, Kashmiris, and Punjabis.
Would like to correct you, he mentioned human rights if Balochi people only.

No not at all!
In fact, thank you for caring so much for OUR people. Only if you had care the same about Kashmir the situation would not have gotten this far. Anyway, this is NOT the problem. The problem or what you say "bad" the desperate attempt to portray that Balochs are in some sorts of misery and it is only India who is concerned. This is probably because it is ONLY INDIA that "knows" it so that is why!
Yes off course, why not should we support human rights of oppressed native people. We do support the J&K people freedom that's why I have the meeting with one J&K native resident day after tomorrow!!!
 
.
India has not converted Baluchistan in proxy war as it doesn't exist as per the Pakistani government. We don't claim Baluchistan as well. We can only hope & pray for the human rights if Balochi people, can we not
sir with all due respect
read your post again
if you can not realize whats wrong with it
kindly ignore me
 
. .
Mehbooba mufti left the press conference in Kashmir in tears/anger when she was challenged that only 5% of the valley was out on the streets protesting. A significant grassroots movement has risen after Wani's death, and most people in the Valley do not view him as a militant the way Delhi or the Indian Army does
 
.
I thi
have guts, tell him to try that in upcoming UNGA...!!! ha ha ha



have guts prove it in International Courts or at-least convince your higher thn sky, deeper thn ocean friend china... a country produce terrorist for the globe and crying abt bloch bloch and bloch, raw, raw, and rawwwwwwwwwwww
I think u r burning u upside down :pissed::omghaha:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom