What's new

Modi effect: 'My father hates Muslims'. India's new law divides families

. .
All this SEVERE anti-Muslim/Pakistani sentiment in india is showing that indians especially the hindus haven't got over the August the 14th 1947 partition of india. Where india lost between 35-40% of it's former territory in the creation of Pakistan. It still pains them and haunts them till this day.

It is not only about anti-Muslim and anti-Pakistan sentiment. India as a collective society is still backward. Watch this song from a film from 1961. The song goes :

Chhodo kal ki baatein, kal ki baat puraani
Naye daur mey likhenge
Milkar nayi kahaani
Hum Hindustani, hum Hindustani
The desire for progressiveness in this song is largely yet to be achieved. India has sent a satellite to Mars and has a large military, yet India has honor killing, farmer suicides, student suicides and other problems.

I quote from the OP to point out the backwardness of India :
Bagaria accuses her conservative Hindu parents of physical and financial abuse - controlling her bank account, beating her, and refusing to hand over the documents she would need to rent a flat.

Not that Pakistan and Afghanistan are any better.

Just goes to show that there is good and bad in every country.

A very valid point.
 
.
Where was that land and hindus before that.
This land was never part of the Hindu land before but always had its separate identity.
The Hindus were mostly being slaves to foreign invaders or internal fighting.
*cough *cough Umm...weren't the people who lost to the invaders the ancestors of people of present day Pakistan? You don't even have a local ruler who carved out his own territory.

All this SEVERE anti-Muslim/Pakistani sentiment in india is showing that indians especially the hindus haven't got over the August the 14th 1947 partition of india. Where india lost between 35-40% of it's former territory in the creation of Pakistan. It still pains them and haunts them till this day.
I am a Hindu and in fact I am quite happy with Partition. Partition would have occurred anyway if there was no Partition in 1947. In fact, even after the Partition in 1947, there was another one in 1971 which just goes to show how fragile the situation was even among people belonging to the same religion.
 
.
Hindus have always hated Muslims let it be Secular or Ultra Hindu nationalist and terrorist like Modi and RSS.Do not be fooled by secular Hindus .The division is clear now what Quaid -e -Azam said 70 years ago .
 
.
I am asking because I feel majority don't understand the bills but are commenting on it and feel India is exploding but it's far from truth.

Dude india has already exploded, you are just seeing the smaller tremors till the bigger implosion.
There was a General Zia ul Haq who changed Pakistan forever, and took us decades to overcome the mess. And there is a modi who is setting your country up on a dysfunctional course of Hindu extremism, where groups like RSS will hold leverage over any one speaking of peace and tolerance.
You won't realize yet, but we will definitely be talking after 5 years and you will know what I meant.

*cough *cough Umm...weren't the people who lost to the invaders the ancestors of people of present day Pakistan? You don't even have a local ruler who carved out his own territory.

Apparently the present day Pakistan is comprising mostly of people who came as settlers and rulers to rule over the indigenous people in India. Civilization always flourished in modern day Pakistan and then entered modern day india either through conquest or influence.

Mostly Punjabis, Pashtun, Balochis are all outsiders, while Sindhis are part of the indigenous population which is fewer in numbers in Pak but makes a giant majority in India.


Kot Diji ... Check
Harappa ... Check
Gandhara ... Check
Indo-Greek Kingdom ... Check
Indo Scythians ... Check
 
.
Dude india has already exploded, you are just seeing the smaller tremors till the bigger implosion.
There was a General Zia ul Haq who changed Pakistan forever, and took us decades to overcome the mess. And there is a modi who is setting your country up on a dysfunctional course of Hindu extremism, where groups like RSS will hold leverage over any one speaking of peace and tolerance.
You won't realize yet, but we will definitely be talking after 5 years and you will know what I meant.



Apparently the present day Pakistan is comprising mostly of people who came as settlers and rulers to rule over the indigenous people in India. Civilization always flourished in modern day Pakistan and then entered modern day india either through conquest or influence.

Mostly Punjabis, Pashtun, Balochis are all outsiders, while Sindhis are part of the indigenous population which is fewer in numbers in Pak but makes a giant majority in India.


Kot Diji ... Check
Harappa ... Check
Gandhara ... Check
Indo-Greek Kingdom ... Check
Indo Scythians ... Check
So 'Pakistani people allowed invaders to come to invade modern India'. How convenient. Why don't you just accept that Pakistan put up a valiant fight but eventually lost to the invaders? I mean which king will allow random people to occupy his land?
Just accept that you didn't have a ruler who ruled large parts of land. Even when Pakistan was non-Muslim. Before the Islamic invasions as well, you just had Hindu and Buddhist Shahi dynasties who put up a brave front against Muslims but lost eventually. One Shahi king had to suicide when he looked at the barbarism of the invaders. Read up. Then there is Ranjit Singh who ruled over large parts.
Great rulers of the subcontinent like Ashoka, Chandragupta Maurya, Samudragupta, Harshvardhana, Shivaji, etc all belong to present day India.

Gandhara is not part of Pakistan now but I agree that Gandhara was ruled by a Hindu Shahi king. What is Indo-Greek and Indo Scythians? I'm talking about a ruler who ruled large areas. The last time Pakistan had indigenous rulers before 1947 was when it was non-Muslim.
 
.
81500113_992848651052763_7864612760003280896_n.jpg
 
.
So 'Pakistani people allowed invaders to come to invade modern India'. How convenient. Why don't you just accept that Pakistan put up a valiant fight but eventually lost to the invaders? I mean which king will allow random people to occupy his land?
Just accept that you didn't have a ruler who ruled large parts of land. Even when Pakistan was non-Muslim. Before the Islamic invasions as well, you just had Hindu and Buddhist Shahi dynasties who put up a brave front against Muslims but lost eventually. One Shahi king had to suicide when he looked at the barbarism of the invaders. Read up. Then there is Ranjit Singh who ruled over large parts.
Great rulers of the subcontinent like Ashoka, Chandragupta Maurya, Samudragupta, Harshvardhana, Shivaji, etc all belong to present day India.

Gandhara is not part of Pakistan now but I agree that Gandhara was ruled by a Hindu Shahi king. What is Indo-Greek and Indo Scythians? I'm talking about a ruler who ruled large areas. The last time Pakistan had indigenous rulers before 1947 was when it was non-Muslim.



Because Pakistan was never really a part of your india?
Where did Kot diji and harrapans come from? From india?
Our people simply had no interest in mingling up with you.
And what you are not getting is, which I'm repeating once again.
Modern day Pakistan is mostly comprised of people who came and settled be invaders or settlers.

Indo Scythians and Indo Greeks are the ones who are historically linked to most Pakistanis alive today including Punjabis, Pashtuns, Baluchis.
While Sindhis being the only people who were indigenous to the subcontintent.

Your so called rulers learnt civilizations through these settlers and invaders.

My ancestors were responsible for the creation of Indo-Scythian Kingdom and the creation of the Chandravansh.
And it started in modern day Pakistan before being exported to your modern day India to rule over the indigenous blackish (no offense) people of Modern day India.

And you are trying to tell me people like Ashoka had anything to do with you indigenous people of India?
 
. .
Just saw the picture in Aljazeera, why would a Hindu woman call her Father Abba and Walid???


Because some of them live in Muslim majority areas and their language might be heavily influenced by Urdu?
 
. .
Dude india has already exploded, you are just seeing the smaller tremors till the bigger implosion.
There was a General Zia ul Haq who changed Pakistan forever, and took us decades to overcome the mess. And there is a modi who is setting your country up on a dysfunctional course of Hindu extremism, where groups like RSS will hold leverage over any one speaking of peace and tolerance.
You won't realize yet, but we will definitely be talking after 5 years and you will know what I meant.



Apparently the present day Pakistan is comprising mostly of people who came as settlers and rulers to rule over the indigenous people in India. Civilization always flourished in modern day Pakistan and then entered modern day india either through conquest or influence.

Mostly Punjabis, Pashtun, Balochis are all outsiders, while Sindhis are part of the indigenous population which is fewer in numbers in Pak but makes a giant majority in India.


Kot Diji ... Check
Harappa ... Check
Gandhara ... Check
Indo-Greek Kingdom ... Check
Indo Scythians ... Check



Lothal,Kalibangan,Dholavira,Rakhigarhi were made by Ancient Indians

I can accept that Mohenjodaro and Harappa were made by Ancient Pakistanis in Ancient Pakistan, but not in Ancient India
 
.
Hindus have always hated Muslims let it be Secular or Ultra Hindu nationalist and terrorist like Modi and RSS.Do not be fooled by secular Hindus .The division is clear now what Quaid -e -Azam said 70 years ago .


Yes Quaid-e-Azam's Hindu Grandfather hated him vehemently---->right!!!:crazy::crazy::disagree::rolleyes::cuckoo:
 
.
Fake news. Hindu fathers are not patriarchal.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom