What's new

Modi Considering Attacking on 23 March Parades in Pakistan?

modi wants to win election and 23 march will suit him.he wants publicity and he also wants to hurt pakistan.we should stop this peace posture.india will always remain hostile towards pakistan.there are few people in their government that controls everything.we must hit high profile targets if they do something.
 
.
An all out war? Let me ask bro, why??? what is the reason, that you are thinking that all this will expand to something larger?

Don't you think Indians will not risk full fledged war? that a full blown war or a conflict at larger scale will damage booming economy of India, that India has lot more to loose than what we may loose?
Because thats the trouble with war check history ask any general u can start it but cant control it so many uncontrollable/unseen factors
@Irfan Baloch when wikileaks shared some documents incl Pakistani intelligence,they discussed that issue ,there are many in these originations who was looking for big time war even nuclear one.Ilyas Kashmiri wa too one of its loudest supporter if u see the output they are in position of gaining a lot in such event.Controlling them is in our interest and as i m seeing our forces and Govt is on same page Alhamdulillah .That would happened long ago if those idiots did not go for political advantages (dawn leaks )
 
.
indians will probably attack. I think the more important question is why are they attacking? why is afghanistan attacking? why is iran threatening to attack?

issue is that previous government(s) and army itself opened the door to foreign powers to kill Pakistani citizens at will. let's compare Pakistan with countries like Iran or North Korea.
  • Do countries attack Iran? NO.
  • Are they afraid to? YES.
  • Do countries attack North Korea? NO.
  • Are they afraid to? YES.
Why is it that other countries refuse to attack Iran or North Korea, whereas they have no hesitation attacking Pakistan?

Can't Pakistan deter attackers with nuclear weapons?
NO. Without ICBMs, Pakistan's nuclear weapons are useless, when it comes to countries aside from india.

When Pakistan tested NASR tactical nuclear weapon, indians called Pakistan's nuclear bluff, Pakistan is hesitant to use nukes on indian cities. Otherwise, before NASR, indians, regardless of Cold Start, were NOT attacking Pakistan.

On the other hand, you may asking why no one attacks North Korea? Simple, they have ICBMs.

You may be asking, why no one attacked North Korea before it had nuclear weapons?
North Korea has shown an important concept, having force and more importantly, having the intent to use it. North Korea has its vast artillery facing the South Korean city of Seoul. Any wrong move and they will destroy Seoul. This strategy has kept other countries at bay from attacking North Korea. They have force. Now, recall that North Koreans have sank a South Korean ship and would often kill/abduct South Koreans too close to the border. This shows that they have the intent to use force.

Why does no one attack Iran?
Iran has built up a ballistic missile and cruise missile capability which they will use in case of conflict. They will saturate & overwhelm the defenses of surrounding countries, wreaking havoc in the Persian Gulf. They will probably fire a lot into Israel. Similar to the North Korean concept, "if they are going to die, they are going to take everyone with them".

Perhaps Pakistan can adopt a similar strategy and turn its guns towards cities of economic importance like Mumbai, Delhi, or Bangalore? Unless you can threaten the indian heartland and demonstrate the intent to use this force, your doors remain open for attack.

Indecisiveness is a very bad quality that runs deep within the armed forces. Armed forces wasted the opportunity to sink IN aircraft carrier in previous wars. History repeated itself, armed forces wasted opportunity to sink IN submarine. Unless Pakistan shows reckless and unpredictable behavior, making it appear to be dangerous, countries will continue to attack it. Also, it wouldn't hurt to test and induct ICBMs. It needs to show force and the intent to use it.
 
Last edited:
.
View attachment 545278

Argument................


this 23rd March celebration is very symbolic due to our recent fight with India
Modi is ravaging like an injured bull whose tail has been savagely shopped off without applying local anesthetic.

he hasn't stopped from putting lives of his countrymen and soldiers at risk before and there is no indication he is giving up on another chance to strike Pakistan.
recall just before attack he tweeted about his desire for peace and contacted Imran reminding him about the promise to end poverty and hunger in the subcontinent?
while Imran was writing in support of that sentiment in his tweet.... IAF was finalizing its attack plan across the LOC...
select Media was briefed, victory claims were rehearsed and posters were already printed
and then the attack happened destroying many trees and kiling a crow and entire India went in a Euphoria .. what followed was not that favorable to many in India including those that found themselves on the wrong end of PAF jets.



Moving On............


23rd March is too much of a tempting target. too many Pakistani forces together PAF distracted, Pakistani military command distracted.

India might be rehearsing the justification.. maybe another "Attack" inside Mainland India or IOK to support this attack? if attacking 300 trees in balakot is justified because they were Pakistani trees then everyone in Pakistan is guilty by association in the mind of Modi.

Ludicrous to think like that isn't it?

is it more Ludicrous than the original Balakot strike along with so called 300 whatever dead? then planning a missile strike
and then sending sub inside Pakistan?

Go on make a case for and against it
Sir I said this on the 28th of February and people only made fun of me calling 'childish' And ' scripted '
Moving on it seems very plausible as they're will be international delegates in Islamabad, incursions down south or up north would be tempting considering our air defence batteries and at least several squadrons and many battalions will be in Islamabad
 
.
Sir I said this on the 28th of February and people only made fun of me calling 'childish' And ' scripted '
Moving on it seems very plausible as they're will be international delegates in Islamabad, incursions down south or up north would be tempting considering our air defence batteries and at least several squadrons and many battalions will be in Islamabad
need to keep the guard up for sure. this is why exceptional circumstances need exceptional vigilance and look out
if some vital assets are not part of the parade then so what? nothing is more than the price of peace and security of the country
 
.
Sir I said this on the 28th of February and people only made fun of me calling 'childish' And ' scripted '
Moving on it seems very plausible as they're will be international delegates in Islamabad, incursions down south or up north would be tempting considering our air defence batteries and at least several squadrons and many battalions will be in Islamabad
Doesn't matter. What's on parade does not effect operational readiness.
 
. . .
A 3 Star, at an unknown bunker keeps an eye out. Any mischief, and he makes sure a befitting reply is given. SOP's are in place for scenarios like this.
True , yet the enemy still has some ' advantage ' compared to perhaps a normal day sir ?
I mean it's safe to assume realistically speaking after what happened to the eastern neighbours on the morning of the 27th, no sane leader of that nation would try again ,
But is that leader and his nation sane ?
Are they desperate ,
Just a plausible scenario, and if they try something there is risk of escaltiaon ,
They should be forewarned that any 'incident ' on that day will have grave consequences for them
 
.
True , yet the enemy still has some ' advantage ' compared to perhaps a normal day sir ?
I mean it's safe to assume realistically speaking after what happened to the eastern neighbours on the morning of the 27th, no sane leader of that nation would try again ,
But is that leader and his nation sane ?
Are they desperate ,
Just a plausible scenario, and if they try something there is risk of escaltiaon ,
They should be forewarned that any 'incident ' on that day will have grave consequences for them

I think some members have attended the parade, they will be in a better position to tell you about how tight the security is, and the multiple tiers of them.

If they try something stupid, they know PAF isn't the only one who can spring surprises.
 
.
True , yet the enemy still has some ' advantage ' compared to perhaps a normal day sir ?
I mean it's safe to assume realistically speaking after what happened to the eastern neighbours on the morning of the 27th, no sane leader of that nation would try again ,
But is that leader and his nation sane ?
Are they desperate ,
Just a plausible scenario, and if they try something there is risk of escaltiaon ,
They should be forewarned that any 'incident ' on that day will have grave consequences for them

I read somewhere that PM of Malaysia will be the guest of honor this year. Do you think India would want to go to war with ASEAN? Keep our guards up; but, I don't think we will be seeing a direct hit before elections. India is back to beating up Kashmiris and sending TTP and BLAs into Pakistan from the Af. side.

Besides, Modi got a boost in polls by selling a "new normal" and that's enough for him. And, I don't see Modi having any certainty in the future of getting other countries to back him 100%. He needs to pick sides in buying arms pretty quickly and as soon as he does, he loses leverage will all sides: the winning side and the losing side. He doesn't seem to have much influence on Putin: the guy waited 2 weeks to call after the Pulawara; signaling to me that it was a false flag.

But he is one crazy fellow: Butcher of Gujarat!
 
.
I think some members have attended the parade, they will be in a better position to tell you about how tight the security is, and the multiple tiers of them.

If they try something stupid, they know PAF isn't the only one who can spring surprises.
I've attended it, quite a lot of sec,

I read somewhere that PM of Malaysia will be the guest of honor this year. Do you think India would want to go to war with ASEAN? Keep our guards up; but, I don't think we will be seeing a direct hit before elections. India is back to beating up Kashmiris and sending TTP and BLAs into Pakistan from the Af. side.

Besides, Modi got a boost in polls by selling a "new normal" and that's enough for him. And, I don't see Modi having any certainty in the future of getting other countries to back him 100%. He needs to pick sides in buying arms pretty quickly and as soon as he does, he loses leverage will all sides: the winning side and the losing side. He doesn't seem to have much influence on Putin: the guy waited 2 weeks to call after the Pulawara; signaling to me that it was a false flag.

But he is one crazy fellow: Butcher of Gujarat!
Exactly my point of view ,
Yet he is a crazy feller
 
. .
indians will probably attack. I think the more important question is why are they attacking? why is afghanistan attacking? why is iran threatening to attack?

issue is that previous government(s) and army itself opened the door to foreign powers to kill Pakistani citizens at will. let's compare Pakistan with countries like Iran or North Korea.
  • Do countries attack Iran? NO.
  • Are they afraid to? YES.
  • Do countries attack North Korea? NO.
  • Are they afraid to? YES.
Why is it that other countries refuse to attack Iran or North Korea, whereas they have no hesitation attacking Pakistan?

Can't Pakistan deter attackers with nuclear weapons?
NO. Without ICBMs, Pakistan's nuclear weapons are useless, when it comes to countries aside from india.

When Pakistan tested NASR tactical nuclear weapon, indians called Pakistan's nuclear bluff, Pakistan is hesitant to use nukes on indian cities. Otherwise, before NASR, indians, regardless of Cold Start, were NOT attacking Pakistan.

On the other hand, you may asking why no one attacks North Korea? Simple, they have ICBMs.

You may be asking, why no one attacked North Korea before it had nuclear weapons?
North Korea has shown an important concept, having force and more importantly, having the intent to use it. North Korea has its vast artillery facing the South Korean city of Seoul. Any wrong move and they will destroy Seoul. This strategy has kept other countries at bay from attacking North Korea. They have force. Now, recall that North Koreans have sank a South Korean ship and would often kill/abduct South Koreans too close to the border. This shows that they have the intent to use force.

Why does no one attack Iran?
Iran has built up a ballistic missile and cruise missile capability which they will use in case of conflict. They will saturate & overwhelm the defenses of surrounding countries, wreaking havoc in the Persian Gulf. They will probably fire a lot into Israel. Similar to the North Korean concept, "if they are going to die, they are going to take everyone with them".

Perhaps Pakistan can adopt a similar strategy and turn its guns towards cities of economic importance like Mumbai, Delhi, or Bangalore? Unless you can threaten the indian heartland and demonstrate the intent to use this force, your doors remain open for attack.

Indecisiveness is a very bad quality that runs deep within the armed forces. Armed forces wasted the opportunity to sink IN aircraft carrier in previous wars. History repeated itself, armed forces wasted opportunity to sink IN submarine. Unless Pakistan shows reckless and unpredictable behavior, making it appear to be dangerous, countries will continue to attack it. Also, it wouldn't hurt to test and induct ICBMs. It needs to show force and the intent to use it.
I thought Pakistani nukes had enough range until Israel?
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom