The policy, and the allegiance don't come from an anchor. They come from the CEO and the owner (if its one or a few people). An anchor is an employee, like Arshad Sharif. He can either have a job or leave. He has to follow the boss. He may be allowed to play unbiased in his show, but that's it.
Your analysis did not remotely elucidate on the topic in question as the evidence shown in the program has not been refuted with logical reasoning. Arshad Sharif can easily leave ARY News and offer his services to another media outlet and this is very common among different anchors across the board in Pakistan as the market for hiring well-established political commentators is lucrative. Maligning a political party where your father-in-law holds a high political official position is illogical, as no financial incentive and threat of sacking from the firm will save you from the wraith of your wife along with her extended family.
Let me back up what I said with an example, as you might ask for a source (its funny you guys have started to play that on me, which is good, at least it'll reduce IK related gossip if everyone provides real proofs). Fox news is a US channel. Its share holders ( a HUGE chunk of money came from a few Muslim people, a prince from the KSA), but Fox news is the biggest bigot against Muslims. You want to see hate against Islam, you go to Fox news!! It doesn't matter who the investors are (Muslim prince), but the policies come from the CEO / President, Mr. Murdoch!! Same applies to ARY, Sama and a few other outlets.
Prince Al-Waleed Bin Talal owned an estimated 6.6% share value of fox news at its peak, which hardly constitutes to the idea of him becoming recognized as a major stakeholder who has the capacity and ability to change the corporate cultural behavior of the organization in reference to its bigotry towards Muslims. The scenario would be totally different, if he was a major shareholder of the company. Media outlets are prone to make sensational allegations, because they are in the business of selling newspapers to the general public for money, however as citizens of Pakistan we are entitled to know the mismanagement failures of the Government and in this case a Chinese company has certain grievances on the issue of tariff. I have previously articulated to you with precise words that I have no political interests with Imran Khan, therefore I seriously don't understand why you bring him into the picture.
This forum has a huge PTI element on here if you havn't noticed. TT from PTI can write anything can ban anyone, including myself (have done that), and many things, no one dare to ask a question. Now such bullshit can ban the forum within 14 days from the US. But that's a different story. So no employee can change a business's policy towards their political allegiance. Usually, the news outlets, forums and TV channels that thrive, are the unbiased ones. But ARY, Sama and part of Dawn have become propaganda tools for IK due to their owners and Tareen's money involved. No one can change that direction.
This forum encompasses individuals who have different political views, however you should inform the moderators to enforce the rule of law on those who are trying to infringe on your right to express your opinion. Most PTI supporters in this forum are aggressive in nature when you question and attack the flaws of their party leaders, which frankly speaking is quite pathetic and extremely bemusing for entertainment purposes. Social reform has occurred in KPK, although economic and industrial reform has been disturbingly lacking. This is because pointless time has been spent on useless political marches. However, Nawaz Sharif must also be criticized under the scrutiny of the public If mistakes are made, because he is not above the law. The same allegation from conspirators can be labelled on the Punjab Government who have donated billions of rupees to media outlets such as Geo News, who have followed and tow-lined a certain agenda of the Government.
T
Second question: Like the above, there is obviously no proof that Pakistani media was paid over a billion rupees, nor there are any proofs that Reham got 750K, ticket from the labor party, a divorce from IK over TEXT when she landed in London or Birmingham (one of these), a BMW and a residence!!!
People in this forum participate in discussing issues because they have no interests in learning conjectures and would rather focus on factual evidence. How can Jahangir Tareen have the capability to pay a billion rupees to different media groups, when his combined declared net worth in 2013 to the election commission of Pakistan was just 1 billion rupee? I have very good friends who belong to both the Conservative Party and the Labour Party, therefore under which constituency was Reham Khan allocated a ticket? Under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (PPERA), there are controls on which donations a political party can accept. These controls apply to parties that are registered in Great Britain. All donations must be recorded and reported to (PPERA) and their findings are published in there website. Since the cash for honor scandal was flashed across the British media in 2007, no political party is willing to risks such an adventure for Reham Khan because it would be suicidal as she is a high profile character under the scope of the media. Which residency was Reham given in the UK, because you can easily find out the occupants who have ownership of the house and since you have fantastic connections with a family member of the Sever's household then this should be a piece of cake for you?