Gunsnroses
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2014
- Messages
- 922
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
So pigeon was the "befitting" reply?
Did I say that?
So tell us please do you have the ability to tackle our pigeons?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So pigeon was the "befitting" reply?
This is about "befitting" reply. Seems like pigeons are the only "befitting" reply you can give... pigeons with olive branches...Did I say that?
So tell us please do you have the ability to tackle our pigeons?
This is about "befitting" reply. Seems like pigeons are the only "befitting" reply you can give... pigeons with olive branches...
First give the "befitting" reply instead of sending pigeons with olive branches, then we can see whether India can handle it or not.. instead of that all we are getting is verbal di... well..If you can't handle a pigeon how would you handle a befitting reply dumbo .
Now carry on whining please
Actually, you see, 1971 was a big favor india did for us. Now we no longer have to strain our resources by diverting them to feed & defend 156 million people in what is today Bangladesh. Now we can focus all of our resources on a single front. Thanks for making our job easier.yawn! and we are waiting for the devastating day you can avenge 1971.
Because that is all we need to scare the living crap out of you bharatis. Our animals are enough to cause a scare and media hype in your country.This is about "befitting" reply. Seems like pigeons are the only "befitting" reply you can give... pigeons with olive branches...
How what?Heh, how? Atleast India carried out those and some without warning many many times. But Befitting reply was missing...
So you admit that India supported terrorism, and instigated civil war in another country? Keep in mind, I'm going to hold these words in the future.Pakistan was not fighting a civil war out of thin air.
It was us that armed and trained and supported those people for the civil war and when they seemed about to lose, we entered directly.
The point is that there are ways around restrictions provided the political leadership is willing to take action. The current political leadership of India is willing to take action and retaliate against Pakistan in multiple ways.
India did it in 1947, 1965, 1971, 1983 and 1999 (Munto Dhalo), leaving numerous cross border raids most of which haven't even been publicized.How what?
India hasn't carried out anything in Pakistan.
What a dumb statement.Pakistan has been in this turmoil after peaceful 15 years of its birth.
Situation is still same. Pakistan is still fighting a war with itself. So nothing has changed actually.
India can always raise the stakes whenever it suits to India. But India chooses not to, not because she's afraid but because India has learned that it is not worth the Time and resources.
So ask your military to tone down And stop sending 2 bit filthy jihadi in India.
That might suit you
Here sir:So you admit that India supported terrorism, and instigated civil war in another country? Keep in mind, I'm going to hold these words in the future.
By the way, this isn't retaliation, this is aggression.
So you admit that India supported terrorism, and instigated civil war in another country? Keep in mind, I'm going to hold these words in the future.
By the way, this isn't retaliation, this is aggression.
First of all, those were war, Pakistan has conducted many aerial raids in India during them, as well; it's stupid to bring them up. Second, 1947 is when Pakistan successfully broke away from India, permanently splitting the subcontinent into many pieces.India did it in 1947, 1965, 1971, 1983 and 1999 (Munto Dhalo), leaving numerous cross border raids most of which haven't even been publicized.
If someone gave me a cent each time pakistan "warned" befitting reply to india, i would be a millionair by now.
So, your military waited 50 years to retaliate? Dude, shut up. stop comparing old events with new ones. This isn't retaliation, today's events are aggressio from India. It's so like you to try your statement to suit your argument.Here sir:
It is called retaliation because in 1965 (6 years prior to 1971), Pakistan did the exact same thing.
Operation Gibraltar was the codename given to the strategy of Pakistan to infiltrate Jammu and Kashmir, a state in India, and start a rebellion against Indian rule. If successful, Pakistan hoped to gain control over Kashmir.
In August 1965, Pakistan Army's 50th Airborne paratroopers and Pakistan Army's guerrillas, disguised as locals, entered Jammu and Kashmir from Pakistan with the goal of fomenting an insurgency among Kashmiri Muslims.[citation needed] However, the strategy went awry from the outset due to poor coordination, and the infiltrators were soon discovered.
Operation Gibraltar - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
We just took what Pakistan tried to do unsuccessfully and did it successfully.
Waited 50 years?So, your military waited 50 years to retaliate? Dude, shut up. stop comparing old events with new ones. This isn't retaliation, today's events are aggressio from India. It's so like you to try your statement to suit your argument.
Pakistan has not shown any aggression towards India in today's age, while India has shown that it's intent is to attack Pakistan every chance it gets. Pakistan is busy stablizing it's western border, it has no time nor intention to start anything with India.
Actually, you see, 1971 was a big favor india did for us. Now we no longer have to strain our resources by diverting them to feed & defend 156 million people in what is today Bangladesh. Now we can focus all of our resources on a single front. Thanks for making our job easier.
Because that is all we need to scare the living crap out of you bharatis. Our animals are enough to cause a scare and media hype in your country.