What's new

MIG-41 – A NEW MACH 4+ FIGHTER

. . . . .
Probably in response to this.
SR-72.jpg
sr72signature.png0a686cb9-8ed1-4906-abe9-94e6ca01204eLarge.jpg


Whether they can go after something that is Mach 6, we will never know.

I know about the Foxbat ...But practically Mach 4 is too much for Recce ....The West were once flying the most fastest jet and the Soviets were shooting them down with their SAMs ...now vice versa ...!

You have proof they shot down the most fastest jet?

It seems that huge air intakes are the key to high speed along with powerful engine. We have seen this in Gripen, Mirage, Mig 27, And new aircraft Mig 41 design. We should make LCA intakes bigger in order to achieve high speed.
lockheed-sr-71-blackbird-1920x1200.jpg
 
.
Mig-25 "FoxBat
Vs
The SR-71 "Blackbird"
rainbow.jpg


Was the Mig-25 Foxbat and the upgrade Mig-31 Foxhound capable of intercepting an SR-71? This question comes up regularly at SR-71 symposiums and Blackbird speaker events throughout the U.S. To put to rest this question is the purpose of this web page.
mig25_4.jpg
During the cold War the Russians were highly concerned about the United State's XB-70 supersonic bomber project. In response, they built the Mig-25 which was designed to be a Mach 2.8 Interceptor for countering air targets in all weather conditions, by day and by night and in dense hostile electronic warfare environments. This was the USSR's answer to the design in the US of fast, high flying aircraft as the XB-70, North American F-108 and Lockheed SR-71. The MiG-25 lacked technological refinement, but its performance caused much concern in the west. It was designed to function both as a long- range interceptor and reconnaissance aircraft. The center fuselage is a big, welded steel fuel tank, so avionics, radar or cameras are in the nose. Speed is limited to Mach 2.83 mainly by controllability problems. The MiG-25 is a twin-finned high-wing monoplane with slightly swept wings and a variable angle tail plane. To improve the aircraft's longitudinal stability and to avert stall at steep angles and subsonic speed, there are two shallow upper surface fences on each wing. The high-wing monoplane configuration together with lateral air intakes both have the effect of reducing the loss of aerodynamic efficiency resulting from wing-fuselage interference. The aircraft is powered by two 11200kg Tumansky R-15D-300
single shaft turbojets, arranged in the tail section of the fuselage. The engines develop 11,200 kgf of thrust with fully selected afterburner. The engines provide a maximum speed of 3,000 km/hour at high altitude. The maximum speed at low altitude is 1,200 km/hour. The aircraft has a service ceiling of 22,500 meters. The range at altitudes between 9 and 11 km with speed of Mach 0.85 is 1,950 km. At higher altitudes between20 and 21 km and speed Mach 2.35, the range is 1,650 km. The maximum in-service g-load is 4.5g's.There are two-seat trainer versions of both the fighter and the reconnaissance version. Production of the fighter ended in 1983. The MiG-25 saw combat in several wars in the Middle East. Over 1200 have been built, of which about 75% were interceptors. The MiG-25 was produced by MAPO-MiG, the Moscow Aircraft Production Organisation MiG, which is based in Moscow and the Sokol Aircraft Manufacturing Plant Joint Stock Company at Nizhni Novgorod in Russia.
mig25e.jpg
In search of Freedom, on September 06, 1976 Lt. Viktor Ivanovich Belenko piloted his Mig-25 (USSR Product #84) from the 513th Fighter Regiment at the Siberian Base of Sakharovka, Soviet Air Defense Command and defected to the United States. He landing the Mig-25 in Japan under adverse weather conditions. No Westerner had ever been close to a Mig-25 and much about the aircraft were unknown.
belenko1a.jpg
It was the one plane most feared in the West. In 1973, US. Air Force Secretary Robert C. Seamans deemed the Mig-25 as "Probably the best interceptor in production in the world today". In 1967 a stripped down Mig-25 set a world record by achieving a speed of 1,852 MPH and another aircraft set the altitude record by soaring to 118,898 feet. Lt Viktor Belenko with very low fuel landed his Mig-25 at Hakodate Airport in northern Japan, running off the end of the short runway. His defection to the West gave the United States the opportunity to closely examine the Mig-25. The aircraft was completely dismantled and then carefully inspected by aviation scientists and engineers from both Japan and the United States. President Ford granted Belenko asylum in the United States and the pilot underwent five months of questioning and interrogation. The United States Government established a Trust Fund for him and the interest alone afforded Belenko very comfortable living in the U.S. He was a free man, at last, to do as he pleased.

Upon dismantling the Mig-25, the data was analyzed by the Foreign Technology Division of the Air Force at Dayton, Ohio. There were many surprises:


  • The Mig had been manufactured in February 1976 and thus was one of their latest most sophisticated production aircraft.
  • Transistor circuitry was not used but instead the Soviets relied on vacuum tubes for most of their electronics. The Soviets reasoned the vacuum tubes were less affected by EMP waves in the case of nuclear attack; were more resistant to temperature extremes and they were easy to replace in remote airfields where transistors may not be readily available if repairs were needed.
  • Welding was done by hand.
  • Rivet heads were exposed in areas not critical to parasitic aerodynamic drag.
  • Pilot forward vision was highly obstructed.
  • With huge Tumansky R-15D-300 engines the Mig was considered almost a rocket.
  • Pilots were forbidden to exceed Mach 2.5. There was a total of three engine instruments and the airspeed indicator was redlined at 2.8 Mach.
  • Above Mach 2.8 the engines would overheat and burn up. The Americans had clocked a Mig-25 over Israel at Mach 3.2 in 1973. Upon landing in Egypt, the engines were totally destroyed. We did not understand that the engine destruction was inevitable.
  • The combat radius is 186 miles.
  • Without using afterburner; staying at optimum altitude and not maneuvering, the Mig can fly in a straight line for 744 miles.
  • The plane was so heavy at 64,200 pounds, that according to early rumors Soviet designers had to eliminate a pilot ejection system. However this was disproved. Most MiG-25s used the KM-1 ejector seat. The last versions used an early variant of the famous K-36 seat. The speed record for the fastest successful ejection (Mach 2.67) is held by a KM-1 equipped MiG-25.
  • Maximum operational altitude: Carrying two missiles, 78,740 feet (for maximum two minutes duration); carrying four missiles, 68,900 feet is maximum.
  • Maximum altitude of missiles: 88,588 feet.
  • Ability to intercept an SR-71: Belenko states the Mig-25 cannot intercept the SR-71 for several reasons: The SR-71 fly too high and too fast; the Mig cannot reach it or catch it. The missiles lack the velocity to overtake the SR-71 and in the event of a head on missile fire (The Golden BB), the Guidance system cannot adjust to the high closure rate of the SR-71.
  • The Mig-25 has a jam proof radar but cannot distinguish targets below 1,640 feet due to ground clutter. The radar was so powerful it could burn through jamming signals by approaching bombers.
  • Maximum G load: With full fuel tanks 2.2 G's is max; with near empty fuel tanks, 5 G's is dangerous. The Mig-25 cannot turn inside a U.S. F-4 Phantom fighter!
  • The plane was made of steel alloy, not high temperature titanium, although strips of titanium was used in areas of high heat concentration.
  • In a tight turn the missiles could be ripped from the wings.
  • The Mig-25 was was not a fighter or an air superiority aircraft but rather designed by the Soviets to climb at tremendous speeds, fire missiles at one pass of the target and then land.
  • Search and tracking radar had a range of 55.9 miles.
  • The pilot duties were to take off, turn on the auto pilot and await instructions to fire the missiles from ground controllers. The Mig-25 had a superb auto pilot and digital communications from an onboard computer to ground controllers.
  • Credit is given to the Soviets for building a high altitude Interceptor in a short period of time with the materials and engines available to them in 1967 in order to counter the perceived threat of the XB-70.
On November 12, 1976, sixty-seven days after the defection of Belenko and his Mig-25 to the West, the United States and Japan returned the Mig-25 to Russia...in dismantled pieces.

Mig25 VS SR-71

This was the 60s technologies and almost Mach 3, with todays tech it is plausible to have a MIG-41 with Mach 4 speed for the same mission, ie; long range interception and most probably newer missions , since the S-400 can perform the interceptions.
 
. .
It looks like a meeting of star trek fanboys here, coming up with ridiculous ideas. The source of this article is as reliable as proof of the Kardishians being faithful lovers.
 
.
I know about the Foxbat ...But practically Mach 4 is too much for Recce ....The West were once flying the most fastest jet and the Soviets were shooting them down with their SAMs ...now vice versa ...!
The world's fastest ? You mean the SR-71 ? I would like to see your evidences of any SR-71 loss because of Soviet SAMs. :lol:
 
.
Now some fanboy will come and put forward the inevitable question: "Pakistan/India should get few of these"

Then we will have a shit-storm of followup threads on it......... and everyone will forget, no such thing ever existed............ :D
 
.
Now some fanboy will come and put forward the inevitable question: "Pakistan/India should get few of these"

Then we will have a shit-storm of followup threads on it......... and everyone will forget, no such thing ever existed............ :D

We have become too predictable aren't we?
 
. .
seems kinda pointless in this era.
wonder how powerful the radar will be
and how durable the engines are and the maintenance costs.
 
.
Here is more important even to do research in this field than the creation of combat aircraft, I think.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom