What's new

Mig-21 in the eyes of veteran I.A.F. Air Commodore(retd.) SS Tyagi

Mike_Brando

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 10, 2012
Messages
3,232
Reaction score
-5
Country
India
Location
India
AHMEDABAD: The man who has done 6316 sorties with the MiG-21, arguably the most by any air force pilot, says there isn't anything wrong with the aircraft many call the 'widow-maker' and 'flying coffin'. As the one-time warhorse aircraft of the Indian Air Force (IAF) completed 50 years in the fleet in 2013, Air Commodore (retd) SS Tyagi, the former station commander of IAF bases in Naliya and Jamnagar in Gujarat believes it is time to set the record straight. Don't blame the machine, he says. Blame the elements that the pilot has to deal with.

Tyagi should know. He has clocked 4,003 hours of flying in the much maligned aircraft - and never crashed.

"The MiG-21 is a very demanding aircraft," says the 70-year-old who retired from the air force in 1996. "The Russians did not design it keeping the comfort of the pilot in view. This is a machine that can help a pilot exalt his capabilities to the end of the skies. However, even a transitory lapse can be disastrous particularly during hard maneuvering."

To fly an aircraft like this in an unfriendly aviation environment like that of India, which has mist, moisture and birds, requires a lot of effort. Also, a pilot has to be always alert not to be caught off-guard while descending since the speed while approaching land is higher in MiG-21s than other aircrafts. "There is not much visibility on offer and you have a plethora of problems to cope with, particularly bird hits that cause flame out. The maximum number of MiG-21s may have been lost due to these factors than pilot error," points out Tyagi.

Till April 19 last year, IAF lost more than half its MiG-21s. Union defence minister AK Antony had told Rajya Sabha last year that 482 MiG-21s had been involved in accidents. As many as 171 pilots, 39 civilians and eight persons from other services were killed in these accidents. At the time, Antony had said that "both human error and technical defects" were responsible for the crashes.

So why have so many pilots died if the MiG-21 is as safe as Tyagi claims? "In the developed world, countries don't care if they have to lose an aircraft," he reasons. "If the aircraft develops a technical snag, the pilot simply ejects. However, an Indian pilot would try to save the aircraft till the last moment. In the process, he loses vital time and that often becomes a question of life and death for him," he says.

The ace flyer has many anecdotes from his flying days which he says point to the reliability of the MiG-21. "Once when I was at Pathankot airbase in 1978, the technical staff and pilots had a bet on flying 60 sorties in MiG-21s from 7 am to 1.30 pm without getting the aircraft serviced. The losing side was to give the winner 24 bottles of rum. The MiG-21s flew 60 sorties - we would have won the bet except that we were late by just five minutes because a bird interrupted the last sortie. However, in our eyes, the MiG-21 was still a winner. It is a tough call for an aircraft to do so many sorties without a breakdown but it survived the test."

Today, MiG-21s make up 10 squadrons of the IAF. Once, they constituted 60 per cent of its inventory. Tyagi says that even now, it is a cost-effective option. "Compared to a Rs 500 crore Mirage, Su-30 MKI and Tejas, an upgraded MiG-21 Bison costs just about Rs 40 crore. But unfortunately, its achievements have been overshadowed by negative publicity."

10441378_616563118440741_8839623438510025512_n.jpg

Timeline Photos - Defence A Need Indeed | Facebook
Guys a must read article from one of the most experienced Mig-21 pilots in the history of the I.A.F.:smitten:
 
. . . .
Nice article, Bison is a very good interceptor even today with added BVR capability.!
 
.
The hero has lived long enough to become the villain.

Not all of it is justified.

However, let us not forget that flying an airplane (a heavier than air object) is one that requires great amount of application of mind and skills. Which is precisely what A/Cdre Tyagi is re-iterating. Some Aircraft are even more demanding of a pilot's mind and skills. The MiG-21 is one such (but not the only one). In the IAF context, many factors worked to make the Fishbed more accident-prone than others. Probably the first such one was the move from trans-sonic western origin aircraft to a super-sonic eastern-bloc aircraft. That was exemplified in the changed environment for a pilot flying the Hawker Hunter as the AJT (of that time) to the Fishbed as the main operational fighter. Many rookie pilots had a rough time of that
Then other factors that A/Cdre Tyagi has enumerated also kicked in. One such was the highly erosive and abrasive effect of the Hot and Dusty atmospherics in India. Turbine blade failure (among other things) were far higher in India, than European countries.
One thing that Tyagi has not mentioned is that the MiG-21 also had some qualitative issues both in its design and manufacture. Contribution of this factor to the mishap rate cannot be disregarded.

All that being said; some of the MiG pilots unreservedly and unswervingly still swear by the aircraft and are around hale and hearty enough to do so. On of them (who I know) retired as an Air Marshal of an Operational Command. He flew every MiG type in the IAF; not just the MiG-21s, but the MiG-23/27s, the MiG-29s and even the MiG-25s and probably has been the fastest IAF pilot in service.

Even the Harriers/Sea Harriers are very demanding aircraft to fly. Ask anybody who has flown them, even from the USMC. Just as Rotary Wing aircraft (Helos) have their own demands. Ask any pilot who learnt to fly the older Helos (without AFC and FADEC) how much time they took to master a perfectly stationary Hover?
 
. . .
The ace flyer has many anecdotes from his flying days which he says point to the reliability of the MiG-21. "Once when I was at Pathankot airbase in 1978, the technical staff and pilots had a bet on flying 60 sorties in MiG-21s from 7 am to 1.30 pm without getting the aircraft serviced. The losing side was to give the winner 24 bottles of rum. The MiG-21s flew 60 sorties - we would have won the bet except that we were late by just five minutes because a bird interrupted the last sortie. However, in our eyes, the MiG-21 was still a winner. It is a tough call for an aircraft to do so many sorties without a breakdown but it survived the test."


Excellent.

So the pilots conduct 60 sorties on one day on one plane for some stupid bet of rum and blow up valuable tax payers money on fuel. :cheers:
 
.
Excellent.
So the pilots conduct 60 sorties on one day on one plane for some stupid bet of rum and blow up valuable tax payers money on fuel. :cheers:
It also can be taken how effective the grounds men are and how confident they are about the work that within the specified time they could make 60 sorties......
Anyway U wouldn't understand and even if u would u wont appreciate..
 
.
Basically he is saying, there's nothing wrong with Mig21. It's the competency [lack of] of the pilots that caused the crashes. He might be onto something. Mig21 has been flown by numerous countries and yet India has the highest number of crashes by a big margin. It's the same machine with different pilots. Putting 1 + 1 together and you can get to the root cause of all those Mig21 crashes in India.
 
.
Basically he is saying, there's nothing wrong with Mig21. It's the competency [lack of] of the pilots that caused the crashes. He might be onto something. Mig21 has been flown by numerous countries and yet India has the highest number of crashes by a big margin. It's the same machine with different pilots. Putting 1 + 1 together and you can get to the root cause of all those Mig21 crashes in India.

polls_jackass_award2_0653_131381_answer_4_xlarge.jpeg
 
.
Back
Top Bottom