Raj-Hindustani
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 4, 2019
- Messages
- 5,208
- Reaction score
- -39
- Country
- Location
Your best chance was with Musharraf. Army is a big stake holder for India policy for a reason & they are capable of making bold decisions. But the problem is on Indian side ..... who you talk to.
Not really....India always knew who to deal with on our side long before IK. Still don't know how you claim to resolve Kashmir issue when half is still under Pakostan/China control. Doesn't it sounds like George W Bush's mission accomplished gaffe moment?.
I'm not a fancy guy, you see. Do not think that Pakistan will ever be able to get Indian held kashmir parts; the same goes for India.
370A was a barrier between Indians and Kashmiri people. It was desperately needed to be revoked, and it should have happened a long time ago.
I am unable to recall.. was it a idea to apply only to parts of India? or also to Pakistan Kashmir, and GB?
- Demilitarization or phased withdrawal of troops
- There will be no change of borders of Kashmir. However, people of Jammu & Kashmir will be allowed to move freely across the Line of Control.
- Self-governance without independence
- A joint supervision mechanism in Jammu and Kashmir involving India, Pakistan and Kashmir.
The concept wasn't terrible if applied to both portions, but no country could accept the third or fourth possibilities.
Better yet, just add a third point: Pakistan and India will each deploy the bare minimum of police security troops to maintain peace and order at their parts.