What's new

Microsoft wins $22 billion deal making headsets for US Army

Vanguard One

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Dec 20, 2019
Messages
1,307
Reaction score
-7
Country
Ireland
Location
Ireland
Microsoft has won a nearly US$22 billion ($28.93 billion) contract to supply US Army combat troops with its augmented reality headsets.

Microsoft and the Army separately announced the deal this week. The technology is based on Microsoft's HoloLens headsets, which were originally intended for the video game and entertainment industries.

Pentagon officials have described the futuristic technology — which the Army calls its Integrated Visual Augmentation System — as a way of boosting soldiers' awareness of their surroundings and their ability to spot targets and dangers.

1617574854630.png

A US soldier dons a military prototype of the Armys Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS) during a squad reconnaissance mission test event at Fort Pickett, Va. (AP)


Microsoft's head-mounted HoloLens displays let people see virtual imagery superimposed over the physical world in front of them — anything from holograms in virtual game worlds to repair instructions floating over a broken gadget.

The Army's website says soldiers tested the gadgets last year at Fort Pickett in Virginia. It said the system could help troops gain an advantage "on battlefields that are increasingly urban, congested, dark and unpredictable."

The Army first began testing Microsoft's system with a US$480 million ($631.14 million) contract in 2018 and said the headsets could be used for both training and in actual battle. The new contract will enable Microsoft to mass produce units for more than 120,000 soldiers in the Army Close Combat Force. Microsoft said the contract will amount to up to US$21.88 billion ($28.77 billion) over the next decade, with a five-year base agreement that can be extended for another five years.

1617574891528.png

In this photo provided by the US Army, soldiers don a military prototype of the Armys Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS) and wield a Squad immersive Virtual Trainer (SiVT) during a training environment and test event at Fort Pickett, Va. (AP)


It's not clear how it corresponds to the $740 billion defence policy bill that Congress passed in January after overriding a veto by President Donald Trump. The bill affirmed a 3 per cent pay raise for US troops but included cuts to the headset initiative.

Sen. Jack Reed, a Rhode Island Democrat who leads the Senate Armed Services Committee, said Wednesday that the technology is promising but its results must be closely tracked "and it's our job to raise issues if the technology isn't meeting the needs of our troops now and in the future."

Microsoft President Brad Smith told Reed's committee in February that the system could integrate thermal night vision and facial recognition to provide soldiers with "real-time analytics" on remote battlefields. He also described how it could help in planning a hostage rescue operation by creating a "digital twin" of the building.

A group of Microsoft workers in 2019 petitioned the company to cancel its initial Army deal, arguing it would turn real-world battlefields into a video game.

Microsoft is among several tech companies that have sought to wow the gaming world with glitzy new virtual reality goggles over the past decade, though the efforts have largely fizzled. Microsoft pivoted away from consumer applications for its second-generation HoloLens 2, introduced in 2019, which is the basis for the Army's new gadgets.

1617574933325.png

Members of a design team at Cirque du Soleil demonstrate use of Microsoft's HoloLens device in helping to virtually design a set at the Microsoft Build 2017 developers conference in Seattle. (AP)


Although Microsoft recently demonstrated a way to use the goggles to play the hit game Pokemon Go, it mostly pitches the devices as work tools to help surgeons, factory crews and others. Users can often control what's on their screens using hand gestures or voice commands.

The headset deal is part of Microsoft's broader work as a defence contractor. The Pentagon in September reaffirmed Microsoft as winner of a cloud computing contract potentially worth US$10 billion ($13.15 billion), although the work has been delayed by a legal battle over rival Amazon's claim that the bidding process was flawed.

 
. .
Nice, I like Microsoft.

I have an iMac(after being a Windows user for decades) and use built in software called Bootcamp to also install Windows which I use to play games.

To be honest, Macs are generally better than Windows for pretty much everything apart from games. They just work, whereas you need to a spend quite a lot of time to maintain Windows to allow it to work efficiently.
 
.
I have an iMac(after being a Windows user for decades) and use built in software called Bootcamp to also install Windows which I use to play games.

To be honest, Macs are generally better than Windows for pretty much everything apart from games. They just work, whereas you need to a spend quite a lot of time to maintain Windows to allow it to work efficiently.
Care to explain further? I have always heard this from ppl...but in my personal experience...I have always used windows since I was a child...and I have never had any issues.

I've used it for things like(hobby) photoshop, illustrator, 3D studio max, flash/dreamweaver(way back before they were bought by adobe), and web design(long before wordpress was a thing).

I've used it for programming(back when computer science was my major before I ended up switching) for multiple languages. Then at a later point after college...while working I used it to develop a MS Access based database(leveraging SQL and VBA).

...and of course I've used it for gaming throughout my life...various different ones from low end to high end stuff.

So between all of these different things...I never encountered any issues whatsoever. The only issues every now and then that popped up...was when custom building my PCs...but those were rare...and once solved...didn't bother me again.
 
. . . .
Care to explain further? I have always heard this from ppl...but in my personal experience...I have always used windows since I was a child...and I have never had any issues.

I've used it for things like(hobby) photoshop, illustrator, 3D studio max, flash/dreamweaver(way back before they were bought by adobe), and web design(long before wordpress was a thing).

I've used it for programming(back when computer science was my major before I ended up switching) for multiple languages. Then at a later point after college...while working I used it to develop a MS Access based database(leveraging SQL and VBA).

...and of course I've used it for gaming throughout my life...various different ones from low end to high end stuff.

So between all of these different things...I never encountered any issues whatsoever. The only issues every now and then that popped up...was when custom building my PCs...but those were rare...and once solved...didn't bother me again.



Sure.

I also come from a background of over a decade in IT and so am more familar with Windows software than a regular end user.

Windows is not bad per se as it can do everything very well but you need to factor in the work the end user(or IT support) needs to put in and also the slightly higher hardware requirments to get the job done as opposed to a MAC.

Let me give you a couple of very simple examples to show how MACs just work out of the box and Windows does not:

1) MACs can natively open pdfs whereas you need to download and install some kind of software like Adobe reader to do this. Yes Microsoft's built-in Edge browser is supposed to be able to do this but it is not very good at it.

2) All MACs come with the fully functional office software like Pages and Numbers. The equivalent for windows is very poor and you are forced to buy Office, which admittedly is better, but for the majority of end users the free Apple software is sufficient.


Another point is that you need less updates and drivers on MacOS but more on Windows. This is mainly more to do with the fact that Microsoft licences Windows to 3rd party PC manufacturers and so they need to let 3rd parties build drivers and updates for Windows.

Lastly if you want to do video editing then you can get away with less powerful MAC as software that Apple provides(iMovie is free btw) is more optimised for MAC hardware than the equivalent for Windows. I do seemless 4K video editing on my iMAC(mid range CPU and GPU) but would not dare anything above 1080p if this was a Windows PC.

Windows PCs do have advantages in that you can tailor the exact system for your requirements, they are far easier and cheaper to upgrade and MACs are not a patch on Windows when it comes to gaming, but if you just want something that just works and have the budget for it, then go for a MAC.


PS - Forgot to mention that for developers MACs are the systems of choice. Just look up youtube videos with developers and most use MACs to program in as they are UNIX-based and so you are able to run programs in almost any language and set up a development environment easier.
 
Last edited:
.
I have 9 windows 10 PC's(all self build except for the laptops) registered to my Windows account, and they are used for difference purposes etc..

But, the usability of Mac OS for normal everyday stuff outclasses Windows by miles, especially the Mac Pro 2013 laptop i have. 7 years later, as fast as the day i got it and silky silky silky smooth, esp the mouse for "sofa browsing"... I can go on. I am not a "mac'ophile", i have more PCs than anything else, but i do appreciate the Mac OS esp on Laptops....
 
. .
1 x new main work pc (2019) for wfh only - need stability.. [ self-build ]
1 x old gaming pc ( 2013 ).. [ self-build ]
1 x mini-itx windows 10 / linux server / pfsense machine. .. [ self-build ]
1 x razer laptop (2019 ) for use outside - 13"..
1 x old acer laptop with windows for dedicated secure internet banking (2010).
1 x pc in parents house for me to use(before laptops..) .. [ self-build ]
1 x pc downstairs in living room for everyone else to use. .. [ self-build ]
1 x intel Nuc - to play around on with win 10 + linux.
1 new Asus strix gaming laptop(2021).. ( cannot buy new graphics card, or new cpu at the moment for main rig upgrade !!!! )

(all windows 10).
+

1 mac os laptop
.
.
.
i like tech ....
 
.
Is Microsoft a Military company, yes.
Is Huawei a military company, US media said yes.

Huawei violated patent laws, and had was hammered into submission due to patent infringement
 
. .
Sure.

I also come from a background of over a decade in IT and so am more familar with Windows software than a regular end user.

Windows is not bad per se as it can do everything very well but you need to factor in the work the end user(or IT support) needs to put in and also the slightly higher hardware requirments to get the job done as opposed to a MAC.

Let me give you a couple of very simple examples to show how MACs just work out of the box and Windows does not:

1) MACs can natively open pdfs whereas you need to download and install some kind of software like Adobe reader to do this. Yes Microsoft's built-in Edge browser is supposed to be able to do this but it is not very good at it.

2) All MACs come with the fully functional office software like Pages and Numbers. The equivalent for windows is very poor and you are forced to buy Office, which admittedly is better, but for the majority of end users the free Apple software is sufficient.


Another point is that you need less updates and drivers on MacOS but more on Windows. This is mainly more to do with the fact that Microsoft licences Windows to 3rd party PC manufacturers and so they need to let 3rd parties build drivers and updates for Windows.

Lastly if you want to do video editing then you can get away with less powerful MAC as software that Apple provides(iMovie is free btw) is more optimised for MAC hardware than the equivalent for Windows. I do seemless 4K video editing on my iMAC(mid range CPU and GPU) but would not dare anything above 1080p if this was a Windows PC.

Windows PCs do have advantages in that you can tailor the exact system for your requirements, they are far easier and cheaper to upgrade and MACs are not a patch on Windows when it comes to gaming, but if you just want something that just works and have the budget for it, then go for a MAC.


PS - Forgot to mention that for developers MACs are the systems of choice. Just look up youtube videos with developers and most use MACs to program in as they are UNIX-based and so you are able to run programs in almost any language and set up a development environment easier.


I think it generally comes down to personal preference. I use both and I can comfortably say both are equally good and have very different purposes. Just like the Android vs IOS debate. Windows are known for their notorious windows updates, drivers and other stuff but they are much more versatile than MAC. I mean you can literally find a program for anything you can think of. While Macs are much more stable but you can't find open-source freeware, because it is meant to be like that.

Moreover, once you run into an issue with MAC there isn't much information available/ fixes available (obviously because less people use them compared to windows). While Windows get broken more often so there are more fixes available for almost every issue.

Both are good, it just comes down to what you are more comfortable with and the type of Job you are doing.
 
.
Is Microsoft a Military company, yes.
Is Huawei a military company, US media said yes.
is Larry Page of Google a CIA/US military intelligence asset, HELL YES - he 's too involved in "military and military technology" related sensitive issues....had 1-on-1 with assange arranged, then was in a meeting with US military deciding which technologies to focus on..omg..lol...
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom