Peshwa
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2009
- Messages
- 4,918
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
No. As per my logic whether a muslim or a hindu makes such a picture, they should be treated equally in a secular country.
In the case of MF Hussain, he is being attacked while dozens/hundreds of similar works by hindus available publicly for everyone to see are going unpunished.
TechLahore....It seems that even after being provided a very spot on answer by Spitfighter....you still continue to play dumb....
a) India is a secular country by constitution....means that every Indian is free to practice their personal religion as and how they please.....and that the Indian Govt. will protect an individuals right to do so....
b) Secularism is not a law such as monogamy that can be enforced on people...I hope you understand the difference...Individuals and people are allowed to make choices based on their own ideals, morals, religious views/beliefs
c) Secularism does not mean that individuals can make offensive depictions of gods of other religions without taking into consideration religious sensitivity
Now which part of this is so difficult to understand that makes you question India's secular credentials.....
If people on an individual basis want to make a hue and cry about MF Hussain and his paintings....thats their choice.....Indian Govt has provided ample security to MF Hussain....he should be happy he is alive....speaks enough for our tolerance....
If people choose not to create a brouhaha over other hindus making paintings similar to MF Hussain, then thats their choice....their hypocrisy.....Our govt will protect those that need protection....obviously you dont expect the GOI to ask people to turn to anger and violence to keep parity between MFH and other hindu painters?
Now the point is.....India as a nation is secular by constitution and our Supreme Courts upholds it.....there are people of all views and opinions, some extreme, others moderate.....that are free to think, react and vocalize their opinions...so where is the question of "metting out different treatment to Hindus and Muslims" wrt GOI?