araz
PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2006
- Messages
- 9,291
- Reaction score
- 81
My point at the cost of a digression is we have written pages upon pages without knowing the actual facts.All that we have is hearsay(with regards to the dossiere and the pakistani investigations).Do you not see the irony and the trap our leaders have put us in. We ned to build trust and listen and learn.We need to forgive and forget and move on.This 'sufficient evidence not there' is the point where Indian and Pakistani official views diverge. You are correct that not much is known about whether the information in the dossiers provided by India contains enough evidence to stand in a court of law. Home minister Chidambaram says that the evidence provided is enough but it may well be for domestic consumption. But i think that at the very least it is the GoI's belief that if Pakistan is serious about investigating the Mumbai terror trail, it can be done with whatever information that has been provided. It seems inconceivable that an attack of such magnitude leaves so small a trail that the case falls flat in a court of law.
But the topic is digressing.
Araz