What's new

Medieval Muslims made stunning math breakthroughs

Muslims under that Arabs at that time was like the center of civilization.

Now, they are garbage.

The whole numerical system was from India.

The problem with India unlike the west, china, middle east, etc back then is that they don't keep a lot of records.

A lot of those records were destroyed, you know by whom.

As an example, the rivers ran black when the barbarians destroyed our Universities and their libraries in Nalanda and Taxila.

The great logic was: "The books are either contradicting the Quran or supporting it and have no reason to exist in either case"!

Now try beating that. ;)
 
.
An example:

Nālandā (Hindi/Sanskrit/Pali: नालंदा) is the name of an ancient center of higher learning in Bihar, India. The site of Nalanda is located in the Indian state of Bihar, about 55 miles south east of Patna, and was a Buddhist center of learning from the fifth or sixth century CE to 1197 CE.[1][2] It has been called "one of the first great universities in recorded history".[2] The Gupta Empire also patronized some monasteries. Nalanda flourished between the reign of the Śakrāditya (whose identity is uncertain and who might have been either Kumara Gupta I or Kumara Gupta II) and 1197 CE, supported by patronage from Buddhist emperors like Harsha as well as later emperors from the Pala Empire.[3]

The complex was built with red bricks and its ruins occupy an area of 14 hectares. At its peak, the university attracted scholars and students from as far away as China, Greece, and Persia.[4] Nalanda was ransacked and destroyed by Turkic Muslim invaders under Bakhtiyar Khilji in 1193. The great library of Nalanda University was so vast that it is reported to have burned for three months after the invaders set fire to it, ransacked and destroyed the monasteries, and drove the monks from the site. In 2006, Singapore, China, India, Japan, and other nations, announced a proposed plan to restore and revive the ancient site as Nalanda International University.




Some more examples:

The infidels in the new territories were mainly Buddhists and Hindus. The Buddhists with their pacifist philosophy offered no resistance and were the first to go. The destruction of the monasteries, the killing of the monks and the rape of nuns is well-known even though there is still no book documenting this episode in all its horror. In particular the destruction of the Buddhist universities of Taxila and Nalanda are particularly heinous crimes. The burning of the Library of Nalanda ranks with the destruction of the Library of Alexandria as the two most notorious acts of vandalism in the course of Islamic expansion.


Ghosh's book gives many examples how these Islamic principles were carried out in succeeding centuries in India against the Hindus. Hinduism had a military tradition, cf. Khrishna's exhortation to Arjuna to fight given in the Bhagavat Gita. But Hindu warfare lacked the fanaticism of the Muslim and theirs was not to convert subject populations. Indeed Hinduism as an ethnic religion meant that people could not come within its confines except by birth. The Hindus were able to offer some resistance but not to the extent of preventing the establishment of Muslim rule over large parts of India.

The fate of Rajasthan was typical. Ghosh writes: "The Rajputs houses of worship were destroyed, their women raped and carried away, their children taken away as bonded labour, and all non-combatants murdered. The Rajputs soon came to know the ways of the *******. If it appeared that the battle could not be won, then they themselves killed their women and children, Masada style, and then went to fight the ******* until death. In many cases the Rajput women took their own lives by taking poison and then jumping into a deep fiery pit (so that their bodies could not be desecrated)".
 
.
Someone decided to divert the current situation in Pakistan by posting 2007 article. Even so, How is Arabs accomplishment became Pakistan's? hehe
 
.
Someone decided to divert the current situation in Pakistan by posting 2007 article. Even so, How is Arabs accomplishment became Pakistan's? hehe

:rofl::rofl::rofl:


No words man
 
.
These are Western scholars . . . . . .:coffee:
Peter Lu is a Chinese guy. Hurray for China, discovering the genius of medieval Muslims where foolish westerners have written them off!
 
.
This is an interesting article i read today .
The science of time travel and search for God | Hinduism | Muslims | The New Indian Express

The science of time travel and search for God

Science is surely one of God’s little jokes? The holy grail of modern science is determining whether the Big Guy exists. In the process it acquires its own gods. Albert Einstein, for example, who gave time a speeding ticket—the speed of light. If this was ever broken, he said, “You can send a telegram to the past.”
Now physicists at CERN, the European Centre for Nuclear Research have sent a telegram to the future using neutrinos. Who will be science’s next god?

Before Einstein, Newton was the scientific deity who, ironically, used the forbidden fruit to explain objects and motion. Science is today’s bulwark against religion. Before Newton, there were two gods who defined the heavens: Ptolemy and Galileo. In his flawed tome, Almagest, Ptolemy concluded that the earth was the center of the universe. Then Copernicus challenged him with the theory that the earth revolves around the sun. In the early 17th century, the church challenged Copernicus, and later imprisoned supporter Galileo for heresy.

It is man’s nature to try and comprehend the universe, whether by meditating in a Himalayan cave or buzzing atoms around inside a laboratory. Most religions—except Hinduism—fear these unauthorised quests. In medieval times, the Church was the self-appointed agent of God’s will on earth. It used methods more barbaric than the Taliban’s, to preserve its dogmatic supremacy. Popes ordered massacres of sects like the Cathars and the Templars. The church burnt witches and tortured ‘heretics’ in the Inquisition. Kings quailed at the fear of excommunication. What the church feared was the faith that resides in the human mind, like an atom that may one day spring a surprise with a neutrino—a theotrino, perhaps? Until Darwin proved that evolution was not possible in seven days, freedom of thought was anathema to religion. The Arabs in the Middle Ages were far superior to their Christian counterparts. Arab astronomers and mathematicians made the uncouth, illiterate knights of Christendom look like barbarians. Unfortunately, temperamental rulers and Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab warped this civilisation and clashed with those who searched for God through other means, like the Sufis for example.

The fakir’s quest is similar to the Hindu sadhu’s: God is everywhere, and everything. He is music, He is dance, He is the Sublime. Ancient Hindu philosophy did not treat science as separate from religion. Hindu thought was inclusive; the healer Charaka, the astronomer Aryabhatta and the mathematician Brahmagupta were as much part of the Vedic ethos as Agastya. The great Bhaskara—whose work on the calculus predates Newton—was taught math by an astrologer. His thesis, the Siddhānta Shiromani, is not just about arithmetic and algebra, but also covers planets and spheres—the fundamentals of astrology. From antiquity, cosmic mysteries were part of Hindu science: architecture has a spiritual aspect, like the Thachu Sastram of Kerala; so does Ayurveda, that celebrates the animistic aspects of botany and the arcana of planetary influences. Divinity wasn’t segmented: science, mythology, mysticism and mathematics together made up God.

If the neutrino experiment is proved, theoretically, time travel would become possible; one that can take mankind to the source of creation and beyond. In the temporal realm of the scientist and the believer, one thing remains infinite: the search for knowledge that is also the search for God.
 
.
The title and discussion are about Muslims, not Arabs.
Were these Iranian scientists and architects Muslim?
Yes.
Case closed.

As for your rabid anti-Arab bigotry which you needlessly drag into every thread, it is irrelevant here.

wtf are you on about?
that's my whole point? Why are we talking about muslims? The article keeps talking about Iranian architecture but then uses it to glorify the Islamic world!!! Same with our scientists. What does their religion have to do with anything? lol

You're a pakistani, not an arab, why are you such a sell out?
 
.
wtf are you on about?
that's my whole point? Why are we talking about muslims? The article keeps talking about Iranian architecture but then uses it to glorify the Islamic world!!! Same with our scientists. What does their religion have to do with anything? lol

You're a pakistani, not an arab, why are you such a sell out?

Now, that's not really fair to him. ;)

He has known nothing else. That's why.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom