@PanzerKiel
I have a question for you, I am not sure if this is the right thread but but please do bear with me.
Galwan proved the usefulness of anti personnel and armor suicide drone systems, considering how Chinese utilized Sula 89 in Depsang to counter and interdict larger Indian infantry forces.
How would you explain PA’s continued lack of interest in loitering munition?
Specially now that India (having already deployed Harpy and another system for about a decade) has just issued a RFP for a anti armor and anti personnel reprogrammable, loitering munition with a range of 60km. This, alongside SpikeER will be a headache for Pakistani armor.
Even Iranians with all the sanctions on them continue to produce more of such systems and developing doctrines around them.
From the looks of it, PA does not exactly seem interested in these. Why?