You never face the problem directly .
Sure it does. It gives people perspectives when they have multiple things to compare to each other.
It is difficult for Americans to imagine that the Democratic and Republican parties have their own internal police forces, out to enforce party discipline and mete out party directed punishments if necessary, and finally responsible to no one but their respective parties. But in amoral China, it is normal and Communist Party members are under constant threat of this separate and relatively unknown police force.
I think you just lost the bet, buddy...
So you switch to another subject?I said before that your China is an amoral country. Not immoral, because that would imply a moral foundation that one could use as a base to deviate from, but an amoral country, meaning one that has no moral foundation at all.
You want evidences of that ? Look at your own youths, specifically the conservative nationalist types.
Angry Youth - The New Yorker
Harvey Mansfield is an American conservative, or in popular language: a neo-con. He was invited by Chinese youth conservatives to speak about how a country can have a moral compass because these young Chinese nationalist and conservatives believes their China have no morals, in other words, an amoral country. They did not call upon the American Communist Party for help. They called an American neo-con.
Your Chinese police brutality is symptom of that amorality. So can we preach to China about human rights ? You bet your undervalued yuan we can.
You got no problems doing that on US, but take offense if we return the same ?
I do not have the energy nor the time to research and refute whenever a western newspaper say something about China. But I think if you are honest enough, you should acknowledge that there is a marked bias in how the western media report events in China.
Show me why my question is an intellectually dishonest question ?
I do not understand so called US human right indeed.
I understand your mentality of whites whorship, product of hundreds years of colonization.
It is intellectually dishonest because it does not address the reasons why anyone would be shot by the police and under what circumstances. There is a difference between a fugitive from the police and an accidental shooting by the police. It really is amazing that you cannot see that.
Michael Brown have more rights in the US than he would have in your China. But if you want to know what rights Brown have, look at the US Constitution.
My question is very simple .
Yeah, He does have more human right in US but he does not have the chance to be judged.
Your question is not merely simple, but a gross oversimplification of the issue implied by the question.
It is tough for Americans to accept these so called 'constructive criticisms' once their comments are read. It is like seeing a jungle tribe that does not have even the wheel criticizing the Space Shuttle. Yes, I would rather have US hold ourselves to higher standards, but for the trolls, I have no problems holding them to our standards as well. And that is what they do not like.
OKay ,forget about the numbers. and try to answer this question:what's your opinion about Brown's death?
How about wait for the investigation ? Or is that too simple for you ?
