What's new

Mashal Khan Revealed Shocking Details About His University In An Interview Before His Death!

He is Marxist and most of these people are atheist so he express his views openly in front of fellow citizens and got killed. sad incident he should be careful especially remarks of majority's faith and Prophet PBUH.

Rest of all these things just a TRP generating stuff nothing more.

Note: I am the one who is part of investigating team.

Many of ANP proudly claim to ve secular, atheist etc since when this is a crime?

One can already get idea from his social media posts that he's at least liberal by Pak standard if not atheist.

This was political murder using Islam.

I did nothing and I am not the deciding authority as I mention clearly my part was only to investigate what happen and what are the causes behind this incident.

He was accused of blasmaphy and last time I cheked being athesit, liberal, secular etc isn't same as insulting any religious figure.

You clearly came up with baseless theory and your report shouldn't be taken at face value if it's true to begin with.
 
.
Honourable Sir,

I have read Das Kapital by Karl Marx also and agree with many of his assertions but it does not make me a Marxists. You are of course entitled to your views. My objection against your post is not that you judged Mashaal to be a Marxist without fully investigating to form a correct opinion. You are however not the only one, intolerance is a national malaise; PTI law maker Ali Mohammed is on record saying that secularists have no place in Pakistan.

What I object is your assertion “Face the consequences”. What consequences? Even if according to your view Marxists deserve to be killed, you seem to be also implying that someone merely accused of doing so deserves losing his life without properly ascertaining whether he was innocent or guilty! This is a very dangerous attitude and result of such mind-set spells total breakdown of law and order.

You are undoubtedly a very learned and educated person; pray tell me following your reasoning; would it be okay that someone who hates you, bribes or coerces a few to swear that you have committed blasphemy in front of a mob, and incites the mob to lynch you without giving you any chance to prove that you were falsely accused?
Isn't Quaid e azam , pretty much sum up religious freedom in Pakistan.


 
.
If you care to read full thread and my post you will understand my POV and I can't share full details here. So it is up to you whatever you presume about me or the findings related to case.

Nabi-e-Kareem (Sallallahu Alaihay Wasallam) Ne Farmaya Ke –
“Jab Do (2) Musalmaan Apni-Apni Talwarein Lekar Bheed Jaaye Tou
Qatil Aur Maqtool (Marne Aur Maarne Wale) Dono Dozakhi Hain”.
Puchha Gaya, “Ya Rasool’Allah (Sallallahu Alaihay Wasallam)!
Qatil Tou Khair (Zaroor Dozakhi Hona Chahiye) Lekin Maqtool Kyun?”
*Aap (Sallallahu Alaihay Wasallam) Ne Farmaya –
“Wo (Maqtool) Bhi Apne Saathi Ko Maar Daalne Ki Hirs Rakhta Tha”.
(Yaani Mauka Milta Tou Wo Bhi Usey Zaroor Qatl Kar Deta)
(Bukhari Shairf)

Mashal was ANP/PSU himself, why? Because they are supposed to be liberal, secular etc But at the same time ANP/PSU dominated university admin couldn't handle some bitter truth he told news channel just days before being killed. If you accuse someone of blasphemy then expect him to get killed by mob and killers to get away. This case is different because of reaction of social media and videos.

If you check ANP leaders social media pages then one will find that they are pro India, influenced by their so called liberalism and secularism, not that different from Mashal posts. ANP used to support secular communist Afghan government before Soviet invasion. ANP also famously wanted to be part of India in 1947.
 
.
Mashal was ANP/PSU himself, why? Because they are supposed to be liberal, secular etc But at the same time ANP/PSU dominated university admin couldn't handle some bitter truth he told news channel just days before being killed. If you accuse someone of blasphemy then expect him to get killed by mob and killers to get away. This case is different because of reaction of social media and videos.

If you check ANP leaders social media pages then one will find that they are pro India, influenced by their so called liberalism and secularism, not that different from Mashal posts. ANP used to support secular communist Afghan government before Soviet invasion. ANP also famously wanted to be part of India in 1947.

Meaning of liberal and secular is more often than not misunderstood. Bacha Khan as well as Red Shirts movement was undoubtedly secular and Bacha Khan was nicknamed ‘Sarhadi Gandhi’. Hence one would infer that NAP / ANP are should also be secular. However secular only means that government has no business with the religion. It does not mean ‘Irreligious or an atheist’ as majority naively believes. Individual members of the secular parties can be and often are, as religious as anyone else. Maulana Abul Kalam Azad was a deeply religious man but was a prominent member of the secular Congress party.

Pashtuns are traditionally religious minded people, but not extremists. However with the rise of the TTP & Al-Qaida, extremism has also become widespread. This incident highlights that poison of extremism & intolerance is now deeply rooted in a large section of Pashtun youth; no different from the South Punjab.

Khudai Khidmatgar aka Red shirts original name was ‘Anjuman –e-islahe-Afghania’ meaning Afghan reform movement. It was quintessentially a Pashtun movement. One of the pledges being “I promise to treat every Pashtun as my brother and friend”.

Liberals do not discriminate on the basis of ethnicity; hence Bacha Khan did not conform to the principals of liberalism.
 
.
this is insane

C9nM7vGVwAAnxt-.jpg:large
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom