What's new

Maryam Nawaz lashes out at Supreme Court judges

it was your lawyer fault didnt prepare well and fought well @muhammadhafeezmalik did your lawyer mention this 63A clause in the court that time? sasta lawyer nahi kara karo na
 
.
Yes, Justice Faez Isa's corruption reference. It never reached Supreme Judicial Council for trial. Instead SC kept issuing orders on legality of presidential reference. So corrupt justice Faez Isa got off on technical grounds
I was asking about other countries.. Pakistan main tou aisi kafi misalain mojud hain.
 
.
Rana Sanaullah says full court na bana to we will boycott the proceedings...but PTI is the one pushing us towards anarchy.

PTI has never taken up this line that we will boycott court ya hum nhn mantay, they criticize the decision and disagree with it, magr phir manna parta hai.

You can't throw the baby out of the pram like this.
 
.
It was clearly mentioned in constitution that Parliamentary Party head is party head but supreme court in its various decisions stated that in-fact Party Head, whether elected or nor is real head of party.

View attachment 865108
View attachment 865107

View attachment 865109

PTI stance in Nawaz Sharif as Party Head Case, which was accepted by SC.

View attachment 865110

Even today Ch. Shujaat removed Q-league's Parliamentary Party Leader. Who to vote in Punjab Assembly by PTI would be a decision of Imran Khan not Sabtain Khan the Parliamentary Party Leader of PTI.
Yes, party head can decide who to expel from the party, but be cannot decide parliamentary affairs as it comes under the domain of parliamentary party, Patwari slave
 
.
party head didnt even bother to tell his party or show the letter.


Let all the counting etc procedure done and then deputy farar speaker came out with lettrr saying i just receive a letter mazak horaha
 
.
FYFhxlvX0AMue8k.jpeg
FYFl2N5WQAIHdc8.jpeg
 
. .
Rana Sanaullah says full court na bana to we will boycott the proceedings...but PTI is the one pushing us towards anarchy.

PTI has never taken up this line that we will boycott court ya hum nhn mantay, they criticize the decision and disagree with it, magr phir manna parta hai.

You can't throw the baby out of the pram like this.
The bench is definitely under pressure..

Anyone can insult the court now without any repercussions.
 
.
Mehmood Ur Rashid is the parliamentary head, but I believe the actual term is parliamentary party, not even head. There is wisdom behind using party instead of head, but I am sure you aren't interested in that.
Democracy never gives authority to decide where to vote to only 1 person
That's why it's neither party head no parliamentary head
It's parliamentary party

The only purpose parliamentary head serves is chairing the meeting of parliamentary party and then giving the written decision of parliamentary party to all members.
He just act as messenger
He have no authority
 
.

Bull-fckng-sh!t.

Talat Hussain is just propagating the Maryam camp view now, trying to make this seem as if Nawaz Sharif was duped aur ganjay kay sath dhoka ho gaya.

Nawaz Sharif was the one who was doing the negotiations directly, he consented to each and everything aur sab kuch is ki marzi say hua tha.

Ab sab ulta par gaya hai to they are trying to salvage something and trying to make a narrative of good cop bad cop, Nawaz Sharif kay sath bhai nay hath kar dia, this was all Shehbaz.

Topi drama. Bas karo awam ko chuttu banana.
 
.
If those decision were wrong than reinstate those de-seated 25 MPAs and count count their votes. Reinstate Nawaz Sharif as Party Head of PMLN as it is a toothless post. If those decisions are give party symbol to all senators which were elected by PMLN votes without party ticket.
Your Mian Mafroor criminal mafia boss was disqualified from parliament on the orders of SC. How could he still stay as party head? Party head must be a person who at least can be eligible to become member of parliament
 
.
The bench is definitely under pressure..

Anyone can insult the court now without any repercussions.

Exactly, if this happens, then this sets a bad precedent.

These parties have 170 something seats combined.

Aglay din agr aik single party agayi with 155 seats and they do a press conference too to get a bench of their choice, then what?

Ab is tarah bench banain gay?
 
. .
Even today Ch. Shujaat removed Q-league's Parliamentary Party Leader.
Ch shujaat have no authority to remove parliamentary leader

Ch shujaat is not part of assembly

All matters of Parliamentary party are solved inside assembly

Only 51% members of parliamentarian party can change its parliamentary leader
 
.
The bench is definitely under pressure..

Anyone can insult the court now without any repercussions.
So what's stopping PTI from not putting the bench in counter pressure? Mafia comes and do whatever it likes while those that are wronged are kept waiting in search for justice
 
.
Back
Top Bottom