What's new

Mapping America's Intractable Homelessness Problem

onebyone

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
7,550
Reaction score
-6
Country
Thailand
Location
Thailand
A new data project aims to help people understand one of the country’s most complex and enduring challenges.


America has an enduring homelessness problem, with incredible human and economic costs. When they’re acknowledged, homeless people are routinely shunned and criminalized, and often considered less than human. But even folks who want to help often find it hard to wrap their heads around the complex issue.

That’s where Gretchen Keillor’s new data project comes in. Keillor, an urban planner at the design firm Sasaki, wants to break the issue of homelessness down into simple, digestible parts through snazzy data visualizations. “As a planner, I think we should be taking a stronger responsibility in responding to this problem and integrating [homeless people] into the fabric of the city,” she says.

The first section of Keillor’s project presents the fundamentals of the issue. It gives a brief historical snapshot of homelessness in America, and contains answers to basic questions (who qualifies as a homeless person?) as well as more complex ones (what causes someone to become homeless?). By laying out this information in short lists and catchy infographics, Keillor hopes that concerned citizens, planners, and policymakers can dispel some common myths. “Homeless people aren’t this other demographic—they’re just people,” Keillor says. Contrary to what some may think, for example, it’s not laziness and lack of motivation that puts these people on the street, but usually a combination of systemic issues and bad luck. In fact, one of the biggest factors behind the phenomenon is the lack of affordable housing.

If the Trump administration’s proposed budget cuts were to become a reality, homelessness in the U.S. would likely rise to levels not seen in nearly 30 years. That’s concerning, given how stubbornly persistent this problem already is in many parts of the country, a fact that the second part of Keillor’s project supports. Among other visualizations, it includes an interactive dot-map of the U.S. homeless population by region, state, and county based on government data. One dot represents five people:

Places with more people also have more homeless people, which is one reason some of those coastal cities have such dense pockets in the map above. But the project also lets viewers add in other layers economic, sociological, geographic, and demographic data. So, we can see the distribution of the homeless, color-coded by density (number of homeless per 100,000 people), for example. The bright red area around Las Vegas isn’t surprising—the city has the largest affordable housing deficit in the country.

To make that correlation between lack of affordable housing and homelessness even more stark, here’s the dot-map overlaid with the average rent for a two-bedroom apartment. Check out the glaring hotspot in San Francisco:

Keillor’s map makes it amply clear that even in booming cities with large safety nets, the continued lack of cheap and decent housing makes homelessness unresolvable. That’s not to say safety nets haven’t helped—some Obama administration programs have significantly reduced homelessness rates nationwide—but they haven’t helped enough. The onus also lies with city governments, many of which have taken cruel and counterproductiveapproaches.

That’s where the third and final part of Keillor’s project comes in. The “strategies” section lays out successful solutions for designers, policymakers, and service providers. “Homelessness is a really weighty, overwhelming issue,” Keillor says. “Someone can go to this website… and find something they could start with.”
 
. .
Yes, homelessness exists only in America.
 
. . .
Yes, homelessness exists only in America.
No, but America is currently the richest and most powerful country in the world. If there's one place it shouldn't exist, it's America.

America is also the only country in the world that spends $600 Billion on its military.
It's incredible how the media discovers US has a homelessness problem soon as a Republican occupies the White House.
Yeah, its a well-known phenomenon, US Democrats and Liberals often go to sleep when a Democrat is in office, even though all the problems are still there.
 
.
It's incredible how the media discovers US has a homelessness problem soon as a Republican occupies the White House.

Hey remember it's all his fault too! All the programs he cut..or is thinking of cutting...or was thinking of cutting...oh well it must be his fault somehow. Yeah!
 
.
No, but America is currently the richest and most powerful country in the world. If there's one place it shouldn't exist, it's America.

America is also the only country in the world that spends $600 Billion on its military.

Yeah, its a well-known phenomenon, US Democrats and Liberals often go to sleep when a Democrat is in office, even though all the problems are still there.

Homelessness is not solely a economical problem, most research agrees that Homelessness is a socio-economical problem where Social as well as Economic have played equally important role along this problem.

Each country have their own homelessness problem, for developed country, such problem stem from multi-dimension factors, such as domestic violence, mental health or economical status. Such reason ranging from partners cannot established permanent housing to avoid abusing partner, to mentally challenged individual, social outcast to people who simply cannot afford permanent housing.

In developed social welfare state, homelessness still exist due to social problems between society and individual. In total welfare state such as Sweden, theoretically, homeless should not have existed, when the government have to provide housing solution on county, municipality and city level, however, as social value different between Swedish, not all of them are allotted housing as a result, especially in city or municipality that lack of housing.

In developing country, the majority of issue related to homelessness is economical reason, simply because the rest of the population cannot keep up with the whole population growth, hence the people that perform less get left behind.

To completely eradicate homelessness is quite hard, it's easy to deal with money problem, however, the social problem country faced cannot be solve in short term and cannot be solved only with injecting money.
 
.
There's a famous story of a lady in China who lived in an underground well in Beijing for 20 years.
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2013-12/07/content_17158759.htm
The problem with democratic countries with a free press is that the media digs under every stone looking for news maggots.

In countries with government controlled media, such stories rarely come out and are snuffed out as soon as they do.

Therefore according to PDFers America has a HUGE homelessness problem, china has none or very minimal. Chinese ghost towns are a figment of imagination made up by haters. India is hugely intolerant while Saudi minorities are rarely troubled etc etc.
 
.
Homelessness is not solely a economical problem, most research agrees that Homelessness is a socio-economical problem where Social as well as Economic have played equally important role along this problem.

Each country have their own homelessness problem, for developed country, such problem stem from multi-dimension factors, such as domestic violence, mental health or economical status. Such reason ranging from partners cannot established permanent housing to avoid abusing partner, to mentally challenged individual, social outcast to people who simply cannot afford permanent housing.

In developed social welfare state, homelessness still exist due to social problems between society and individual. In total welfare state such as Sweden, theoretically, homeless should not have existed, when the government have to provide housing solution on county, municipality and city level, however, as social value different between Swedish, not all of them are allotted housing as a result, especially in city or municipality that lack of housing.

In developing country, the majority of issue related to homelessness is economical reason, simply because the rest of the population cannot keep up with the whole population growth, hence the people that perform less get left behind.

To completely eradicate homelessness is quite hard, it's easy to deal with money problem, however, the social problem country faced cannot be solve in short term and cannot be solved only with injecting money.
Sure, it's not easy to solve homelessness. But it wasn't easy to develop nukes or send a man to space either, yet it was done.

Reducing economic inequality is important and ultimately beneficial in the long-run. That is generally the advice given to developing countries, but it applies equally to developed countries. Reducing homelessness in the US, for example, will definitely reduce the crime and drug problem much better than the current approach of militarising the police force.

You can not deny that even though countries like Sweden haven't been able to completely eliminate homelessness, they have the situation under much better control than the US.

Inequality and homelessness are a byproduct of the capitalist system - if you're going to stick to this system, you'll have to address these flaws.
 
.
Sure, it's not easy to solve homelessness. But it wasn't easy to develop nukes or send a man to space either, yet it was done.
This is a bad argument. You are basically putting US under an impossible standard. Human beings are rebellious in nature. Whereas the components to make a nuclear bomb do not fight back. As long as I obey the laws of physics, eventually I will create a nuclear bomb.

The causes of homelessness is not a lack of land, or jobs, or sympathy, or resources to make houses. Rather, the cause of homelessness is MOSTLY humans and in that, we have little controls over human nature.

Reducing economic inequality is important and ultimately beneficial in the long-run.
How ? Give US details.

Anybody can say 'Reducing inequality'. But how ? I cannot force someone to work as hard as I am and in this, there is an immediate inequality as I work more and harder, I will become more wealthy than he.
 
.
Sure, it's not easy to solve homelessness. But it wasn't easy to develop nukes or send a man to space either, yet it was done.

Reducing economic inequality is important and ultimately beneficial in the long-run. That is generally the advice given to developing countries, but it applies equally to developed countries. Reducing homelessness in the US, for example, will definitely reduce the crime and drug problem much better than the current approach of militarising the police force.

You can not deny that even though countries like Sweden haven't been able to completely eliminate homelessness, they have the situation under much better control than the US.

Inequality and homelessness are a byproduct of the capitalist system - if you're going to stick to this system, you'll have to address these flaws.

Actually, sending people to moon is easy, finding a way to end all inequality (economical, social, cultural) is not.

The problem, as I explain before, is socio-economical, the two basically goes hand in hand with each other, as I said before, it's not just a economical matter in the decision.

A Mexican friend once told me "There are no psychological illness in Mexico", well, both you and I know there are no way there aren't any psychological problem in Mexico or anywhere, what he actually mean is, people are poor, mental problem is basically being ignore, simply because you don't even have enough resource to get to your daily need, where would you find resource to combat mental problem?

While I agree, militarizing police force is never a solution to combat socio-economical problem, the problem is, so does eliminating economical inequality, the basic problem is this, there are always people who are hardworking, people who are lazy, people who think for themselves and people who think for other, people who think their next door neighbour is stupid, and people who love their next door neighbour. Social Equality is not something any country can make just by pouring money and trying to reach wealth parity, in fact, if history taught us well, it will go the opposite way. And in case of a big country like the United States, it will just like my friend said, mental illness is only for the rich people. In this case, putting people in economical equality would actually be much worst.
 
.
This is a bad argument. You are basically putting US under an impossible standard. Human beings are rebellious in nature. Whereas the components to make a nuclear bomb do not fight back. As long as I obey the laws of physics, eventually I will create a nuclear bomb.

The causes of homelessness is not a lack of land, or jobs, or sympathy, or resources to make houses. Rather, the cause of homelessness is MOSTLY humans and in that, we have little controls over human nature.
The human nature excuse is a bad argument. Your system works that way, not human nature.

You've just admitted solving homelessness is mostly an issue of distribution rather than a lack of resources. If you're willing to manipulate the laws of physics, doing the same with the laws of economics shouldn't be that big of an issue.
How ? Give US details.
Stop deregulating banks and giving corporations tax breaks, stand up to big pharma and set up single-payer healthcare, redirect some of the funds from the military to giving everyone proper education.
Anybody can say 'Reducing inequality'. But how ? I cannot force someone to work as hard as I am and in this, there is an immediate inequality as I work more and harder, I will become more wealthy than he.
Do you really believe that inequality in the US is an issue of people not working hard enough? Well, it's not. A lot of the homeless work much harder than your average millionaire. Productivity has generally been increasing - if it was only about hard work, inequality would be decreasing.

The idea that they're poor because they're lazy is very inaccurate.

And here's a funny thing; most employers prefer not to hire someone who is homeless. So how are the homeless supposed to work their way out of homelessness? Not to mention that homes are so expensive these days that more and more well-educated people with jobs are having to live with their parents, the homeless don't stand a chance.

The people who are rich aren't rich because they work a million times harder than the average person. They are rich because they can profit off the work of others. That is one of the inherent 'features' of Capitalism. That's why you're supposed to have things like regulations, taxes and social security.

the basic problem is this, there are always people who are hardworking, people who are lazy, people who think for themselves and people who think for other, people who think their next door neighbour is stupid, and people who love their next door neighbour.
See my response to gambit as far as lazy and hardworking is concerned.
Social Equality is not something any country can make just by pouring money and trying to reach wealth parity,
Sure - I'm not saying anything about 'wealth parity' or giving out free money. Proper, carefully planned and executed economic policy is needed, policy that is not influenced by special interests but rather by national interest and the people's interests.
 
. . .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom