Is there anything wrong with this? Have you misunderstood the spirit of the contract and the bottom line of the law?Well yeah, you may not be aware about your shenanigans for the the lowly thieves that you are
Here's one example of legal bottomline and spirit of contracts.
China goes on an intellectual property offensive
Enhanced IP legislation means foreign companies need to be ready for lawsuitsasia.nikkei.com
Here's a smol blast from the past
Apple loses trademark fight over 'iPhone' name in China
A Chinese company is free to use the name "IPHONE" on its handbags and leather goods after Apple loses a trademark court ruling in China.www.bbc.com
Apple lost the lawsuit for not registering the corresponding class of trademarks in China, which was its own fault. The trademark of China's well-known home appliance company Hisense has also been squatted in Europe. This is not a problem that only occurs in China. The emphasis on intellectual property rights shows that the Chinese market is becoming more and more transparent, and any legally owned intellectual property rights can be protected. This is also the reason why many multinational companies need to fully deploy intellectual property rights. Everyone has to pay for their own mistakes. Apple is no exception.
The activities of various multinational companies in India, in addition to dealing with various security issues, also need to face the huge challenge of local protectionism by inefficient government and local industry associations. A very simple example, how does India "protect" the intellectual property rights of various original drugs? Perhaps the more than 800,000 victims who died in the poison gas accident in Bhopal have the most say. They exchanged their lives for the outrageous attitude that India now treats the patent of the original drug as the poor monitor lizard.
At least, the monitor lizards, hens, pigs, and sheep here don't have to worry about being raped.Wow coming from the biggest IP thieves in the world