ek_indian
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2009
- Messages
- 1,514
- Reaction score
- 0
I agree with this point of yours, albeit to some extent. The problem with Dr Singh is that he is not a grassroots level leader. He actually doesnt have a mass following like say Vajpayee or PVN had. Their clout in politics came from this mass support and hence they had that much control over matters of the state and various ministries when they occupied the PMO.
But then, one cannot micromanage the affairs of the state. PVN, even though he had such vast experience and political clout, literally gave Dr Singh a free hand to implement economic reforms. Good governance comes from proper delegation of authority and responsibilities and ensure that those delegated responsibilities are carried out efficiently. Thats what CEO's do, thats what Head of Govt.'s do.
But yes, his lack of grassroots level mass support does diminish his political clout in the government and that to some extent affects his interactions with other leaders. But then, doesnt Sonia have his back against any political backlash from within the party or in the politics? Stooge or no stooge, Dr. Singh does have excellent academic credentials and very good chemistry with other world leaders. A very important point to consider when India is on a path to become a major world power. Or would you like to have the likes or Mayawati or Mamta Banerjee or even Lallu hobnobbing with world leaders at various forums?
I really never wanted to get into this debate. But I will try to say some points:
No one is saying MMS should look after everthing. Micromanaging is even not possible considering quantity of ministries. Do you really think that ABV or PVN used to interfere in everyone's domain. However they should when situation demands so. You yourself said PVN gave a free hand to MMS regarding financial reforms. This is where I see MMS lacking. Sitting idle or adopting silence is just another form of head-buried-in-sand syndrome.
I recall one recent example of spat beteen home ministry and foreign ministry. Entire nation was expecting to know what is the position of govt on this issue, from highest authority. But we did not hear anything concrete. This is where I say, MMS's credibility is low. He should have come forward which did not happen. Another such incident is confusion over naxal issue.
One more thing, I do not believe in the theory MMS can be pressurised given his clean record, experience, expertise etc. Ofcourse some political considerations are there. But when one do not see actions from PM, one tend to believe stooge thesis.
Lastly, I never advocated for Lalu/Mayawati or alike. They are worthless to talk about. But there are better candidate for job (with political clout). I myself consider Pranav da, best suited for current scenario. IMO, finance minister and prime minister should swap their profiles.