Mani Shankar Aiyar justifies Paris terror attacks!

[Span]

Now where the hell is he justifying the act? He's rather commenting on what, according to him, called for such an act.

Indian media never fails to put up fancy headlines and people just jumping on the bandwagon here.

 

[mujhaidind]

what he said is correct

 

[Guynextdoor2]

The 'Secular Fundamentalist' Returns. This guy epitomizes Indian 'secularism'.

Confessions Of A Secular Fundamentalist by Mani Shankar Aiyer — Reviews, Discussion, Bookclubs, Lists

The good thing about the right wing is that it's very intelligent and sensible
Sakshi Maharaj stirs controversy, says Hindu women should give birth to four kids | The Indian Express

 

[Gandhi follower]

EXCLUSIVE PIC - Mani Shankar Aiyar speaking in defense of terrorists.

 

[Guynextdoor2]

Now where the hell is he justifying the act? He's rather commenting on what, according to him, called for such an act.

Indian media never fails to put up fancy headlines and people just jumping on the bandwagon here.

Such arguments are wasted on right wingers intent on an orgasm. In any case I might point out that IBN will definitely twist headlines since it's owned by Ambani now who has cash to make from Modi.

 

[AshishDelhi]

so many visits to fundamentalist countries has rot his mind BTW his Ramon catholic Queen Sonia might not be happy hearing these remarks.

Yup...this wasn't Hindu Muslim conflict where he could have shown his secularism freely. This is something even queen has condemned.

 

[Krate M]

Where is the don't go full retard meme pic that belongs to this thread?

 

[psynic]

The 'Secular Fundamentalist' Returns. This guy epitomizes Indian 'secularism'.

Confessions Of A Secular Fundamentalist by Mani Shankar Aiyer — Reviews, Discussion, Bookclubs, Lists

He wrote an actual book on that?? Hilarious!

 

[halaku]

Yup...this wasn't Hindu Muslim conflict where he could have shown his secularism freely. This is something even queen has condemned.

I hope E.U should bar this roman slave.

 

[gslv]

Hi,

It is called FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

Still he is alive and a sitting MP so no muzzlling of free speech. At the most we consider him terrorist sympathizer.

 

[halaku]

what he said is correct

So when are you going to blow Amir khan and Salman khan bcz as a Muslim they consume pork , wine and participate in kafir festivals.Oh sorry you a PDF jehadi

 

[MilSpec]

View attachment 182348

I welcome this comment. Mani Shankar Aiyer is a congress political think tank... people like him will help completely decimating congress from India. We need more Rahul Gandhi's and Mani Shankars in congress.

 

[Tshering22]

Hi,

It is called FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

It is called promoting terrorism, an act of treason.

Under the Indian Penal Code for Sedition is Section 124A, this is a punishable offense and an act of war against our country.

Mani Shankar Aiyar is guilty and should be arrested as per the law.

Freedom of expression and speech was what those dead cartoonists did.

Whats wrong with indian politicians? One announcing reward and the other one justifying the attack?

Whats going on in india?

Gifts of following secularism...

 

[RescueRanger]

View attachment 182348

Wrong... You have gone to their country, you abide by their rules... Not the other way around:

I remember when the Queen of England came to Pakistan and wanted to visit the Faisal Mosque, she complied with the required to cover her head and take off her shoes:

Just so people understand the gravity of this symbolic gesture, the queen had never been seen barefoot "in socks" before this visit as it is not allowed for the queen to show her hands and feet in public whilst on public duty.

----
So if their queen can come to our country and comply with our customs, why should we force our customs on them... JUST WHO THE HELL DO WE THINK WE ARE?

 

[Tshering22]

Wrong... You have gone to their country, you abide by their rules... Not the other way around:

I remember when the Queen of England came to Pakistan and wanted to visit the Faisal Mosque, she complied with the required to cover her head and take off her shoes:

Just so people understand the gravity of this symbolic gesture, the queen had never been seen barefoot "in socks" before this visit as it is not allowed for the queen to show her hands and feet in public whilst on public duty.

----
So if their queen can come to our country and comply with our customs, why should we force our customs on them... JUST WHO THE HELL DO WE THINK WE ARE?

You are one of the few sensible voices here, buddy.

Respect is a mutual thing and naturally and when it comes to living in other cultures one has to respect the norms.

Thanks for this introspecting post.

I think it should be applicable to all of us living in different parts of the world.