What's new

Mamata should become PM of Bangladesh if she wants support of their citizens: BJP MLA Surendra Singh

Their ancestors were from North India! Btw, what's with your unhealthy fascination with the Biharis? Talking about Bihari Muslims, those that went to your East Pakistan utopia were bundled in refugee camps by the Bangladeshi ethno-fascists. Some of them made their way to live in Pakistan while lakhs of them fleed back to Assam(and India) to avoid persecution. The rest remain in your country in abject poverty like the Chakma tribals.
Actually there were no historical evidence to suggest any large scale migration of Punjabis to Assam in last 700 years after Ahom people arrived. Unless your elders mothers used a semen bank of Punjabis.. they were most likely impregnated by biharis or hindu miyas.. :lol:
 
Sikh religion started in 15th century.. and I am not talking about sikhs living in assam but your Assamese ancestry.
Are you suggesting these Sikh males impregnate your women for money?

This is the Assamese Sikh History. Only around 4000 of them are there. They are likely the dependents of the Sikh Soldiers who had sex or married local woman.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikh_art_and_culture

Assamese SikhsEdit
Although the ancestors of the Sikhs of Assam were from Punjab, the Assamese Sikhs have been living in Assam[9] for over 200 years. The community traces its origins to the times of Maharaja Ranjit Singh who took his army to Assam. According to the 2001 census, there were 22,519 Sikhs in Assam,[10] out of which 4,000 are Assamese Sikhs.[11]

Assamese Sikhs follow the Sikh religion and celebrate Sikh festivals. However, they also celebrate local festivals such as Magh Bihu and wear traditional Assamese dress. Their language is the Assamese language.[11][12]
 
This is the Assamese Sikh History. Only around 4000 of them are there. They are likely the dependents of the Sikh Soldiers who had sex or married local woman.
Ohh those 4000 sikh soldiers... thats where they found their ancestry. I got it now... those dirty biharis and miyas were just door bearer...
 
View attachment 579726

Yeah, the results are there for all to see, all hail the Bangladeshi miya warriors and intellectuals! @TopCat

Okay look, I have no issues with you posting junks from the internet but don't quote me and waste my time. That atlas published by Harvard University should have cleared all doubts but your repeated grasping at the straw only goes on to show how insecure and inferiority complex-ridden you people are. Do you really think your primitive ill-educated Assamese historians have more credibility than Harvard scholars?

I was not asking about those Indian communities living there but the people who germinated you. And Aurangzeb sending 50000 troops...? These areas usually ruled from Dhaka or মুর্শিদাবাদ. @Species

I'm done educating that axomiya dude about history, there is nothing of historical value in his posts. He has simply no idea about the history of the region yet posting whatever junks he finds from the internet. I mean there is no shame in belonging to a primitive tribe with no historical heritage but desperately trying to falsify well-documented history just proves how ashamed he is deep inside about his own roots and in doing that he's disgracing the entire Assamese community.

Bakhtiyar Khalji did suffer a defeat in his expedition to Tibet, under the banner of Delhi Sultanate. However, it was the Tibetan chieftains (most likely backed by Chinese imperial army) who defeated Bakhtiyar Khalji but that ahom dude is trying portray it as Assamese victory. lol. Heck Bakhtiyar and his troops even reached Tibet without any resistance on the way.

Two simple facts prove how Assam has always been a primitive hinterland under the authority of Bengal.

Bengal Sultanate was one of the largest trading partner of Ming China and the trade route, commonly known as the Southwest Silk Road connecting Bangladesh with Yunnan and Tibet, used to pass through the area what is now known as Assam. A basic level of logical sense would help one understand that this trade route wouldn't have existed if Assam was really a hostile territory to Bengal.

Assamese people trace their origins to the primitive Austro-asiatic tribes from Burma, yet they speak an Indo-Aryan language. Now you can guess whom they borrowed the language from. The Ahoms did have a distinct language with its own script but not surprisingly couldn't survive the dominance of Bengali cultural influence, another evidence of the political subjugation of Assam under Bengal.
 
That atlas published by Harvard University should have cleared all doubts but your repeated grasping at the straw
You are the clueless one cherry picking bits of history to suit your whims, the Harvard map you shared was from the time when the Kamata kingdom was at its weakest, Husain Shah took advantage and tried to expand his rule towards lower Assam.

What you conveniently ignore is the the borders were quickly redrawn soon after when the Baro-Bhuiyan chieftains of middle Assam attacked your Sultanate and killed Danial(Husain's son and the incumbent regent) to push your lungis back.

All this led to the rise of the powerful Koch kindgom which would go on to annex parts of North Bengal and Sylhet in the coming years(the map which i already shared in a previous post).
Bangladesh with Yunnan and Tibet
That road passed through present day Sikkim and Nathu la, if you consider that to be a part of Assam then one would be inclined to question your dubious knowledge of geography and history.
Bakhtiyar Khalji did suffer a defeat in his expedition to Tibet, under the banner of Delhi Sultanate. However, it was the Tibetan chieftains
Clueless as usual, ONCE AGAIN!! There was a tacit understanding between the Kamarupa and Tibet rulers to let Bakhtiyar cross the Teesta onwards his journey to Tibet where he was deceitfully waylaid (got the taste of his bitter medicine) by the Tibetans.

Kamarupa kingdom attacked him during his RETURN journey as he attempted to cross into the Brahmaputra valley. The attack was so vicious that only a hundred of his troops remained and they were forced to eat their own horses to stay alive. We took mercy on some of the remaining soldiers and they form a part of our Assamese muslim community now(Gorias).
Assamese people trace their origins to the primitive Austro-asiatic tribes from Burma,
Incomplete and half-baked knowledge is dangerous, becomes worse when someone vomits the spurious contents on an open forum. Here is a picture showing migration of different tribes to present day Assam.
614px-Assam_Assimilation.png
 
:lol::lol::lol:

As I said dude, don't post stories written by your so called Assamese historians with no historical value, they are never recognized or cited by the academia.

Now take a look at the map of early 15th century East/South Asia below, published by Harvard University Press, and spot your forest land Assam. Ahoms were nothing more than a primitive tribal kingdom, vying for control over a small peace of hilly area in Upper Assam against their rivals Chutiyas. While, almost the entire Assam, including Kamarup remains under the Bengal Sultanate.

800px-Map_of_Ming_Chinese_empire_1415_%28cropped%29.jpg

Source: Historical and Commercial Atlas of China, Harvard University Press 1935

Assam has always been a primitive hinterland of Bengal, be it the Palas, Bengal Sultanate or the Mughals. The Mughals were mostly concerned with the Portuguese in the south to establish Mughal naval dominance over Bay of Bengal which is why they remained content with only their proxies in Assam.

Note that unlike Assam, Bangladesh and West Bengal are not forest or hilly areas. Hence, history of Bengal has been written based on archeological evidence and not on folklore or mythologies like what you see among Assamese people.

At first I thought you were trolling, then I realized the only folks Ahoms ever fought were literally,

The Chutiyas!!

It says that right there on the map.

Chutiyas!! :rofl:
 
The fruit has fallen far from the tree it seem for you. While you dissociate yourselves from your Chota Nagpur tribal ancestors we have no qualms in saying that a major chunk of my state also comprise of Indo-Aryans other than the Tibeto-Burmans or the Tai groups.

Here are a couple of Assamese Bamuns for you!
View attachment 579737 View attachment 579738

Assamese Sikhs(notice the difference from those from Punjab)
View attachment 579739

These are more like it....your bhojpuri hijra ancestry...

iu


iu
 
Yeah, the results are there for all to see, all hail the Bangladeshi miya warriors and intellectuals!
Because of these wars in the past during the historical period spanning five centuries, the Miyas have established themselves in western Assam. The final result of these invasions is the division of Assam into Bengali-speaking cultured Assam and tree-living tribal people like you.
 
Back
Top Bottom