What's new

Malegaon case: Col Purohit likely to be sacked by Army

EjazR

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 3, 2009
Messages
5,148
Reaction score
1
Malegaon case: Col Purohit likely to be sacked by Army - India - The Times of India

NEW DELHI: Lt-Colonel Shrikant Prasad Purohit, arrested in November 2008 by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) in connection with the Malegaon blasts, is likely to be sacked by the Army soon.

Though Purohit (38) is facing proceedings in a civilian court for the Malegaon blasts, apart from being questioned in some other cases, the Army's own court of inquiry (CoI) held under the Lucknow-based Central Command is learned to have recommended that his services be terminated with immediate effect.

"The CoI report is being considered by the Army HQ at present. It will then be forwarded to the defence ministry for final approval,'' admitted an official on Thursday.

The episode represents a dark blot on the largely apolitical and secular credentials of the 1.13-million strong Army. It was the first time that one of its officers was arrested for being involved in a terror attack, and that too in a case where Hindu radical elements targeted Muslims through the Malegaon blasts on September 29, 2008.

The only other such incident in recent years was in 2006 when three jawans of the Jammu and Kashmir Light Infantry had come under the scanner for being in touch with Lashkar-e-Taiba militants.

The arrest of Purohit, a military intelligence officer who was commissioned in 1994 after passing out of the Officers' Training Academy at Chennai, had forced the Army to conduct internal checks to ensure there was no radical right-wing penetration in its ranks. Defence minister A K Antony had then held that no infiltration of Hindutva elements into the Army had been established in the investigation.

Purohit was arrested after being moved from Pachmarhi (Madhya Pradesh), where he was doing a Arabic language course at the Army Educational Corps Training College and Centre, to Mumbai to facilitate his questioning by the ATS.

The ATS had also arrested Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, Dayananad Pandey and a retired major, Ramesh Upadhyaya, among others, for the blasts, which were allegedly planned by radical right-wing Hindu outfit Abhinav Bharat as a retaliation against the series of bomb blasts engineered by jehadi terrorists in different cities.
 
Col Purohit is not proved guilty by any court as matter is still sub judise. How can one be held guilty without giving fair trial??????

The law says one is innocent till he proved guilty beyond reasonable doubts.

Why is army acting on mere suspicion and rumors?????

Also, no amount of justice or walking extra mile will prove our true secular characters in the eyes of people who just wanna blame India.
 
There was a full inquiry commission setup by the Army, its not sacking him on mere suspicion. And this has not to do just with the secular character of army. Someone in the army broke the law, he is being punished. The CoI would not have recommended his sacking without proof.

-----------------

When the court of inquiry was ordered in March last year, a senior army officer said its brief was to probe:

A possible collusion in the stockpiling and/or procurement of weapons/explosives and/or procurement of arms licences in violation of the Arms Act

The possible involvement of other officers/soldiers knowingly or unknowingly in a conspiracy; this is being examined to see if provisions of the army act have been violated

What connections have been established that stain the character and military reputation of the military person(s) involved (under the Army Act)

How could the conspiracy (if established) be kept confidential from superior officers in the chain of command (under the Army Act).

Source
 
Its a gud decision. If sm1 found in such activities, he must be punishd irrespective of the religioun. .just recently bjp precident Nitin gadkari said terrorist hv no religion ie. Hindu,muslim and christian
 
Why are members from Pakistan so far silent on this bit of news, the very source of infinite consternation, the Samjhauta/Godhra axis of argument. For India thats one down, and yet many more anomalies to set right, but it does deprive some robinhoods here of one more arrow to shoot at India in the hope of buttressing their own cranky arguments.

Why not come out in open and acknowledge that India does not need self anointed monitors from across borders to punish perverts that acted against a minority?

Without wanting to flame what is the update on Gojra?
 
Back
Top Bottom